-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items
-
Supporting Vendors
-
-
Latest Topics
-
-
-
Similar Content
-
-
By kc10dave
WTB factory Beretta CX4 Storm 9mm 10-Round Mags at reasonable price. Please PM with any proposals. I'm In the 08016 Burlington Area. TY
-
By taylorham
This ad is for 500 rounds of new production CCI Blazer Brass 9mm Luger 115 gr FMJ in bulk that has been split off from a larger case.
Asking $320.
Located in 07924 and willing to deliver within a 15 mile radius. Buyer will need to show current NJ DL with matching FID.
The first to post "I'll take it" wins the sale. Please follow with PM. Thanks for looking.
-
By this_is_nascar
Looking to sell the 9mm ammo, pictured below. I have the following available.
American Eagle = 8, 50rd boxes.
Federal = 10, 50rd boxes.
Buyer must have a DL and FID with matching name, address, etc. I'm willing to meet within 10-15 miles or so from Gloucester City, zipcode 08030.
I'm asking $32 per box or $240 for all the American Eagle.
I'm asking $32 per box or $300 for all the Federal.
Take it all for $525.
The 1st "I'll take it", with clarification of which they want, will get the sale(s).
This is my 1st FS post here, so I hope I've covered everything. Thanks for looking.
-
By StanMan01
Looking to sell a sealed case (1,000 rounds) of Brass Blazer 115 grain 9mm ammo. Don't shoot much in the winter so letting this go.
Price: $SPF
Rounds: 1,000
Must have matching Drivers License and FID
Pick up in Essex County Friday, Monmouth County this weekend
The first to post "I'll take it" wins the sale
Cash is preferred.
-
-
Posts
-
Does this only apply to legal, law abiding CCW holders or people that are caught with an illegally carried firearms as well? I have a feeling for the later it will be status quo... no action taken -
Does this apply to existing NJ FID holders? Or does one still need to renew our current FID card 4 years from today? -
When did this start? I know its been on the books for years, but they've also circumvented it for years via a camden judge ruling public safety supersedes it (if investigation not complete in that 60 days), and using that as precedent. Is it now being enforce?
-
Thanks I followed up with resolution to the immediate problem, which doesn't seem to reflect well on Identogo. I have my ORI (Woodbine SP). Regarding the CCN (I'm not to that point yet) should I try calling NJSP Firearms DIv, since my local NJSP contact refused to give me any information about id numbers for SP 642? -
I'll be DAMNED (or perhaps NJ and/or Identogo should be). After failing at electronic enrollment, I went to the "PRINT-N-GO" enrollment section, which I had previously used for fingerprint cards for out-of state CHP applications. I received the same "Multiple matches" error. I started playing around with my personal information fields, and discovered that the apparent culprit is my phone number! I supplied my mobile phone number, since I plan to use that on my SP 642 (and since my land-line number may be going away soon). My mobile service is through Ting, which is a pay-as-you-go T-Mobile reseller. When I changed the PRINT-N-GO form to use my land line number, I was allowed to proceed! So, I went back to the electronic fingerprinting enrollment form, entered the land-line number, and it look slike all is good to go (I am up to the point where I am prompted to enter my ORI - I will update if I encounter more obstacles). But how effed up is that restriction? I must assume that sometime in the distant past (I have had the number for 4 - 5 years) my number was assigned to someone else who created an Identogo record. Um, in spite of the option to keep a number when changing providers, mobile numers get reassigned ALL THE TIME. Unless my assumptions are incorrect and there is some alternative explanation, this would seem to be biting a significant number of people in the a$$; not just applicants for concealed carry, but people applying for government jobs, etc. If I did not have my other phone number, I would be stuck with no recourse except possibly to try to contact someone at Identigo who could conprehend and rectify the matter, and I suspect that would be an extremely long and frustrating process, if even proved to be possible. If you intend to enroll for fingerprinting by Identogo as part of your SP642 applications, you should be aware of this potential glitch. SHEESH!!!!
-
-
