Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Moto102

I have underestimated the beretta cx4

Recommended Posts

So I picked up a almost new cx4. Not really my type of rifle but I figured The price is right and maybe the wife will like it. I bought a vortex red dot for it because the factory sites are useless in my opinion. It only took a few clicks to sight it in. I sent the target out to 65 feet shot 4 (lower group). Went up one click and fired 5 from a supported standing position (upper group) Picture speaks for itself. I'm very impressed with this little carbine.

post-4931-0-72524000-1472576401_thumb.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are great guns.

 

I bought mine to go with my 92 Brigadier Inox, but when I got a 9mm PX4, I picked up the conversion parts (magazine insert and release) for the PX4.

 

I build a D/I .45 AR, which is very light and fun. Just got a Ruger .44 carbine (not the magazine one, but the tube fed rifle), which is my only other pistol caliber carbine.

 

Give me a rifle that takes .40 M&P magazines, and I'll buy. [emoji41]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, not a fan of the Sub2000...

Why not? It's ugly but from all accounts I've seen the gen 2 is a really nice gun(for what it is). I've been searching for a 9mm S&W mag one to match my M&P

 

this signature exceeds the 15 character capacity count

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Give me a rifle that takes .40 M&P magazines, and I'll buy. [emoji41]

 

Just Right carbine.  There's a model that takes M&P Mags in 9mm and .40 S&W.

https://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/cPath/2084_36_1817/products_id/719007696/JRC+GEN+3+40+MP+17TB+TD+BLK+15

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not? It's ugly but from all accounts I've seen the gen 2 is a really nice gun(for what it is). I've been searching for a 9mm S&W mag one to match my M&P

 

this signature exceeds the 15 character capacity count

KelTec usually has teething problems with new designs, and the Gen 2 was no exception.

 

Not a fan of how they feel, either. I'm sure they are capable firearms, but I don't like ones that feel cheap. I'd probably put it along the lines of when the M16 first was fielded, but if I don't feel confident with it, I don't trust it.

 

I got to take a look at that...

 

My other desire would be for it to take Compact magazines, as well. [emoji106]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got to take a look at that...

 

My other desire would be for it to take Compact magazines, as well. [emoji106]

 

I think it would work.  The Glock models work with glock 17 and 19 mags.... so i don't see why the M&P models wouldn't work with fullsize and compact mags - they're not that much different in size

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • This mindset baffles me. Shooting is a depreciating skill. If you don't practice, you will become worse at it. If you value your life enough to want to defend it, why would you rely on a skill that you don't practice? If the best I can do on a good day is scrape a pass on CCARE, I would be determined to get better at shooting - and yes I did see that you scored 98% - but your attitude appears to be that you shouldn't have to practice first. Trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, perhaps you mean that the government should not mandate that you have to meet any kind of standard before you can carry. I agree. There should not be any mandated quals. However, only a fool would be carrying a gun he can't use effectively. It does little to protect himself and creates a danger to everyone else because the misses will go on to hit something or someone after they miss the intended target.
    • OK let me explain. If you use your 9MM to qualify you will probably need to practice before you qualify so you go through 125 rds of ammo. Using expensive 9mm ammunition that's probably close to $0.40 around is costly. If you used your .22 LR pistol the price drops to less than 10 cents a round. I easily qualified with my Glock 226  ( 1 miss out of 50) but burned up  a lot of ammo practicing. We should not be required to qualify to exercise a constitutional right and it should not cost a few hundred dollars to do so.
    • Up for sale a Nikon Monarch 1.5-4.5X20 Riflescope. Scope formerly sat on top of my old Mini 14, so it is used. It also has some aftermarket lens covers on them (Buffalo Creek I believe). I'm asking $100 for the scope. Willing to drive within an hour of Woodbridge or meet half way. Buyer pays any shipping costs. First to post "I'll take it" wins the scope.
    • In 50 years of living in NJ I've never experienced any attempt to inspect the interior of the home, and only one definite inspection of the exterior for an announced reassessment of all properties and that was a drive by. About 9 years of that was living in an apartment, but still, uncommon. Every place I lived had either a finished attic, basement, or both. But they were also included in the habitable square footage on the taxes when we got there. 
×
×
  • Create New...