Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
NJGF

Smith and Wesson Model 629 Revolver Barrel Length

Recommended Posts

I am interested in getting the opinion of people you have shot the Smith and Wesson Model 629 revolver in different barrel lengths. I have shot the 6" barrel and it was doable. S&W has it available now in 2 5/8", 4", 5", 6", and 6 1/2" barrels. The longer barrels are heavier guns so that probably makes them easier to shoot.. Are the shorter barrels difficult to shoot (feel, recoil, etc)? I am interested in hearing about shooting .44 Magnum cartridge.(I know that the .44 special cartridge is a different animal and easier to shoot).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started shooting 44mag a year ago. The cartridge i moved up from was 41 Magnum. 

 

I bought the 629 4inch and also shot the 6inch one. I didn't notice much difference in recoil. I was shooting Freedom Ammo FMJ 44mag which is not a full 44 load.

 

The 4inch is more maneuverable and i find it pretty good to handle and shoot.  I ve shot full power loads with it and 44 mag with full recoil is hard. 

 

I m sure others will chime in with more experience......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am interested in getting the opinion of people you have shot the Smith and Wesson Model 629 revolver in different barrel lengths. I have shot the 6" barrel and it was doable. S&W has it available now in 2 5/8", 4", 5", 6", and 6 1/2" barrels. The longer barrels are heavier guns so that probably makes them easier to shoot.. Are the shorter barrels difficult to shoot (feel, recoil, etc)? I am interested in hearing about shooting .44 Magnum cartridge.(I know that the .44 special cartridge is a different animal and easier to shoot).

I'm an expert on the .44 Magnum Smith and Wesson.  I bought my Model #29 over 36 years ago.  I've shot every barrel length they ever made and own a 8 3/8" w/o the underlug.  I can answer ANY question you can come up with, but I need a little more info from YOU:  What EXACTLY is the gun going to be used FOR?  Alaskan Bear protection while fishing?  Long range target shooting (with or w/o a scope?)?  Expensive plinking?  Hog Hunting in PA?  Executive protection a-la Secret Service from the last century?  Holster or no holster (is conceal-ability a factor?)?  What can you now hit with a good hand gun at 50 and 100 yards?  Once I know WHAT the intended purpose IS, then I can make suggestions as to barrel length, porting jobs, holsters, ammo, etc.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point my use would be plinking. OWB holster (not concealable). The ability to stop a predator (bear or human) if the need ever arises. I have a permit and it looks like a nice gun to own. My concern is that the smaller barrels will be not so much fun to shoot accurately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point my use would be plinking. OWB holster (not concealable). The ability to stop a predator (bear or human) if the need ever arises. I have a permit and it looks like a nice gun to own. My concern is that the smaller barrels will be not so much fun to shoot accurately.

OK, so since you've already admitted that you're "recoil sensitive", I'd stay away from scandium frame w/ titanium cylinder since you're NOT going to carry this for a 12 hour shift and only shoot it to qualify with twice a year.  I'd go for the longest, heaviest model currently available (if buying NEW that would mean 629, 629 Classic, 629 Hunter).  I personally can carry my 8 3/8" model 29 all day w/o any fatigue, having recently done so on a Hog Hunting excursion last April on an island in the middle of the Susquehanna River near Harrisburg, PA.  In fact I've used that gun for USPSA w/ .44 Specials.

 

The trick to taming the recoil is getting rid of the fancy wooden grips (especially checkered ones---OUCH!) and finding some Pachmayr rubber grips to slap on it.  The difference is like Night and Day, and will enable you to develop confidence in your hand gun abilities so as to enable you to start to shoot as accurately as the hand gun is capable of :) .   My 36 year old ugly-ass Pachmayr's let me shoot full-house Magnum rounds weak-hand only (which should always be practiced should the need arise to use the hand gun in a defensive situation IF your strong hand is out of the fight).

 

If you're serious about buying a .44 Mag, I can guest you into Old Bridge so you can "take a ride" on the "Ol' Warhorse" (YOU supply the factory ammo).  I'll just have to let you LOOK at the Bianchi X-15 Cross-Draw rig I got for it (since NO Cross-Draw rigs are allowed at the Club).  By the time I'm done with ya, I'll have ya doin' B-27 silhouettes at 100 yards :) .

 

Lemme know,

Rosey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The longer barrel also allows the powder charge to burn inside the barrel, where it can do some good, and not out in front of the barrel, where it produces a spectacular but useless fireball.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love my 6" 629-1... but it really comes down to personal preference. To me, I connect a lot easier with it than the 4" 686 that I originally shot (wasn't a bad gun, I just feel the .357 is not that good of a job from .38, especially when you compare .44 Magnum to Special). My father bought the two revolvers, but cut himself on the 629. Wanted to sell it, but I started shooting it instead (around 12 or so).

 

When I got old enough to get pistol permits, he gave it to me. One of those guns that I will NEVER let go.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point my use would be plinking. OWB holster (not concealable). The ability to stop a predator (bear or human) if the need ever arises. I have a permit and it looks like a nice gun to own. My concern is that the smaller barrels will be not so much fun to shoot accurately.

GROUND CONTROL TO MAJOR TOM................................Is the OP out there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only ever shot it indoors.

Well then you probably saw the FLASH, lol!  I need to get you outside with that "Thingy" so we can see what it does do plastic milk jugs filled with water AFTER it goes thru some wood panels :) .  Before it gets too cold to play with water....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well then you probably saw the FLASH, lol! I need to get you outside with that "Thingy" so we can see what it does do plastic milk jugs filled with water AFTER it goes thru some wood panels :) . Before it gets too cold to play with water....

I'm down with that. It does make a hell of a fireball. The only downside is it costs about $70 to pull the trigger 20 times hahh..

 

The most fun part about this gun, isn't shooting it. It's handing it to a buddy that's never shot one before, and watching it be shot.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The M29 Classic with 5" bbl. is a nice handling, well balanced revolver, as is the original M29 with either 6 1/2" bbl. or 8 3/8" bbl.  I prefer the 8 3/8" and think it's a nice shooter. (Off-topic: I also think Ruger's Redhawk with 7 1/2" bbl. is a nice blend of weight and useful barrel length.) 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My 8 3/8" Model 29 is 36 years old.  I used it for USPSA practice matches years ago when .44 Spls. wear cheap.  Very soft-shooting gun that makes IPSC major power factor AND THEN SOME!  Back "in the day", from a surrender start, I was able to get 5 shots on a USPSA target (3-Alpha's, 2-Charlie's and a Delta) in 2.68 seconds, drawing that 8 3/8" barrel out of a codura nylon Uncle Mike's OWB strong-side holster.  So I don't consider a longer barrel a "limitation", just something that requires practice to be proficient on the draw :) .  Brought it with me to a Hog Hunt last April (I was running the Hunt, not harvesting that trip).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Similar Content

    • By Trader979
      Smith and Wesson 357 Magnum 686P (7 shot) 4” revolver. Excellent condition. Includes case and all paperwork.  $650 or best offer. Monmouth County.  Cross posted. First person to say I’ll take it. Sale will comply with all NJ and federal laws. 






    • By Ballard
      For sale never used cylinder for a rough rider single shot revolver in 22 magnum. I got a gun with two swappable cylinders but never got mag ammo and don't have the gun anymore, so it's brand new. As I understand you can swap it into any 22lr rough rider to make it a magnum, but confirm this yourself. Heritage sells them for $29.99 (plus tax & shipping I assume). Willing to ship but you pay.
      https://www.shopheritagemfg.com/cylinders/heritage-22wmr-cylinder-black-6-shot-331-0002-01
       
       


    • By My1stGlock
      Anyone knows of a reliable gun smith or armorer that can swap a barrel on a S&W 686+ revolver? If you used them even better. Any idea on the cost to do the work? Obviously someone local in NJ as the first choice. Thanks for any leads. 
    • By Maksim
      Finally had the chance to spend a good amount of time with the gun.  At this price point, there is no reason not to get one!
       
  • Posts

    • I very seriously doubt this has anything to do with terrorism.    1) Harbor pilots are VERY seriously vetted, and highly trained. Not to mention extremely well paid. My experience knowing a few of them, and knowing how they are recruited and screened tells me that there is a slim to highly unlikely chance that a harbor pilot would have participated in anything like that.    2) Maintenance of foreign flag ships is well known to be dubious. Especially these days. These were NOT US flag, Jones act sailors. It was (to my understanding) a largely Indian crew on that ship, with a Ukrainian Captain. Indian crews are not exactly known for being stellar.    3) The bunkers (fuel) these ships use is ‘Bunker C’, which is a heavy, dirty fuel oil that can, and usually is, pretty contaminated. This stuff ain’t your car grade gasoline or diesel fuel. It’s nasty.   It requires nearly constant filter changes and maintenance to the engine/generators. The ship took on fuel prior to departing port, which would stir up all kinds of shit in the fuel tanks, which would contribute to particulates in the fuel lines/filters.    4) I’d say the posting of the chief engineer for Maserek above was pretty spot on as far as chain of events.    This was a shitty accident, with horrible timing and outcome. Not a terror attack. 
    • I saw Lara's interview on Bannon's War Room, and that gave me pause for thought. Her conjecture depends primarily on the veracity of her sources. Regardless, if it's not applicable in any way to this ship disaster, the methods described seem valid to me. And worthy of consideration for the future. As I said before, IMO something is coming. Death by a thousand cuts? Lara Logan Provides Comprehensive Baltimore Update: Experts in Behavioral Analytics, Counter-Terrorism, and National Security Analyze Recent Incident | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
    • Another big windfall for governments'. The 'winner'? Not so much. Mega Millions $1.13 billion winner is facing mega tax bill. The amount is staggering. - nj.com
×
×
  • Create New...