Jump to content
ajpaul59

Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017 Hudson, NC

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, demonicdave said:

A qualified individual must: (1) be eligible to possess, transport, or receive a firearm under federal law; (2) carry a valid photo identification document; and (3) carry a valid concealed carry permit issued by, or be eligible to carry a concealed firearm in, his or her state of residence.

 

2 hours ago, Zeke said:

You’ll do yourself a favor if you link your source..

 

1 hour ago, voyager9 said:

There were two versions of the bill, House and Senate. One had “any stste”, the other had “state of residence”. I forget which was which 

:::::::::::::::::::::::::;Ҥ 926D. Reciprocity for the carrying of certain concealed firearms

“(a) Notwithstanding any provision of the law of any State or political subdivision thereof (except as provided in subsection (b)) and subject only to the requirements of this section, a person who is not prohibited by Federal law from possessing, transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm, who is carrying a valid identification document containing a photograph of the person, and who is carrying a valid license or permit which is issued pursuant to the law of a State and which permits the person to carry a concealed firearm or is entitled to carry a concealed firearm in the State in which the person resides, may possess or carry a concealed handgun (other than a machinegun or destructive device) that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, in any State that—:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;

 

i added the emphasis.

 

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/38/text?q={"search"%3A["concealed+carry+reciprocity+act"]}

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, 1LtCAP said:

 

 

:::::::::::::::::::::::::;Ҥ 926D. Reciprocity for the carrying of certain concealed firearms

“(a) Notwithstanding any provision of the law of any State or political subdivision thereof (except as provided in subsection (b)) and subject only to the requirements of this section, a person who is not prohibited by Federal law from possessing, transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm, who is carrying a valid identification document containing a photograph of the person, and who is carrying a valid license or permit which is issued pursuant to the law of a State and which permits the person to carry a concealed firearm or is entitled to carry a concealed firearm in the State in which the person resides, may possess or carry a concealed handgun (other than a machinegun or destructive device) that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, in any State that—:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;

 

i added the emphasis.

 

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/38/text?q={"search"%3A["concealed+carry+reciprocity+act"]}

@demonicdave

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I’m really shocked NJ wasn’t one of the opposing 17 :huh:

Ohhhhhh, Grinch Mouth Murphy will oppose it along with signing 21 anti gun bills plus what Christie vetoed. He’ll bring them in too. He wants to raise taxes and make NJ a sanctuary state. He said he wants to be the east coast version of CA. Notice I said, what he wants. Now you know why I want out of here asap! [emoji35]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎11‎/‎26‎/‎2017 at 6:27 AM, bhunted said:


Ohhhhhh, Grinch Mouth Murphy will oppose it along with signing 21 anti gun bills plus what Christie vetoed. He’ll bring them in too. He wants to raise taxes and make NJ a sanctuary state. He said he wants to be the east coast version of CA. Notice I said, what he wants. Now you know why I want out of here asap! emoji35.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am out in February, Pennsylvania bound

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, carl_g said:

Just dont bring your "NJ-ness" to PA. Kindly leave that at the border. Thanks.

Unfortunately I’m hearing up on 78 penslytucky side is all ready changing. It’s not just conservatives that are fleeing this state 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Zeke said:

Unfortunately I’m hearing up on 78 penslytucky side is all ready changing. It’s not just conservatives that are fleeing this state 

Of course not. These caret baggers, screw up an area, then when it becomes too oppressive and expensive they flee the very damage they helped cause, then set up camp and do the same thing in other areas. There was a time in the not too distant past that folks were fleeing NY for NJ to get away from the high taxes and corruption.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Zeke said:

Unfortunately I’m hearing up on 78 penslytucky side is all ready changing. It’s not just conservatives that are fleeing this state 

like i keep trying to tell everyone.......it is a virus. and the virus will spread.

5 minutes ago, bzer1 said:

Of course not. These caret baggers, screw up an area, then when it becomes too oppressive and expensive they flee the very damage they helped cause, then set up camp and do the same thing in other areas. There was a time in the not too distant past that folks were fleeing NY for NJ to get away from the high taxes and corruption.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Zeke said:

Pretty sure that was ANJRPC....

Nope. Stungun case is NJ2AS. They put the money where mouth is. Walking the Talk.

----------

Consistent with that prior advice, please be advised that, as of October 22, in accordance with a Consent Order entered in the United States District Court in New Jersey Second Amendment Society v. Porrino, No.

--------

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jackandjill said:

Nope. Stungun case is NJ2AS.

----------

Consistent with that prior advice, please be advised that, as of October 22, in accordance with a Consent Order entered in the United States District Court in New Jersey Second Amendment Society v. Porrino, No.

--------

My bad was thinking NH carry. I got corn fused 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...