Jump to content
SJG

Load AR through ejection port

Recommended Posts

While I think it is cool, not something I'll buy. Have multiple magazines for a reason, and have a few different loaders depending on ammo source (load one at a time, load a bunch from a tray, or load from stripper clips).

Loading through the ejection port just seems like an easy way to jam up the rifle... unless they came up with a fool proof way of making sure it is good to go. Not condemning the design, but something I'd look at if I were considering it. What happens when you have the loader a little bit away from receiver? What happens if you are at an odd angle (front is closer/further away from receiver than rear)?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see it being faster nor easier. You have to alter your gun and I can just see it now. You got to cram the rounds in and for some odd reason it jams and you either break your thumb or disjoint it.

Just as easy using multiple mags.

Pass....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If NJ in the future tightens the evil feature statute this may be away to solve the problem. This device was designed for Calif where they would run an AR-15 with a bullet button, to create a fixed mag. Now I think they have eliminated the bullet button work around and need to have a fixed AR-15 mag which means they had to remove the upper to load the mag in the lower. With this device that step is unnecessary. I am sure the device which is designed for 10 could probably be manufactured for 15 if the demand was present. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, SJG said:

If NJ in the future tightens the evil feature statute this may be away to solve the problem. This device was designed for Calif where they would run an AR-15 with a bullet button, to create a fixed mag. Now I think they have eliminated the bullet button work around and need to have a fixed AR-15 mag which means they had to remove the upper to load the mag in the lower. With this device that step is unnecessary. I am sure the device which is designed for 10 could probably be manufactured for 15 if the demand was present. 

If NJ tightens the evil feature statute they'll probably include this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...