Rob0115 1,105 Posted August 7, 2017 On 8/4/2017 at 8:24 PM, 67gtonut said: http://www.tactical-life.com/news/sig-sauer-p320-dallas-pd/#sig-p320-2 No issues with P320 +1 mine runs like a top. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
raz-0 1,259 Posted August 7, 2017 OK, so more news. OMaha outdoors is pulling sales of the 320 becuase they drop tested 4 and found 3 would fire when dropped. http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/08/daniel-zimmerman/breaking-omaha-outdoors-halts-sales-of-sig-sauer-p320-pistols-following-drop-testing/ Oh wait. 3 of the 4 were torture tested. Yeah.. the 3 that would go off when dropped in a very specific manner. Also the one that didn't go off had a different trigger shoe that's lighter. Also nobody addressed the fact that there are 3 different factory triggers yet. "standard" which is no longer sold, "adverse conditions" which used to be optional, but now ships on all of them, and the flat trigger. Also of note, they all passed the saami and CA DOJ tests. The failed test combines the height of the ANSI/SAAMI test and the hard surface of the CA DOJ test and changes the angle form both. IT looks like the truth about guns is ordering their own and plans to try to actually do some testing right. At this point, absolute worst case is sig has to put some speed holes in the fat trigger bars. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matroskin 29 Posted August 7, 2017 What I'm surprised is that commercial/military tests do not include vertical drop tests performed in the video. Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
raz-0 1,259 Posted August 7, 2017 1 hour ago, Matroskin said: What I'm surprised is that commercial/military tests do not include vertical drop tests performed in the video. Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk The military tests might. It wouldn't likely cause an issue with SIGs offering for the military contract as that mandataes a thumb safety. Which, unless implemented really oddly, would negate this issue as it would physically impede the motion of at least one item involved in this. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Ray 3,566 Posted August 8, 2017 Man, people really hate this gun. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeke 5,504 Posted August 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, Ray Ray said: Man, people really hate this gun. I know, it's lonely at the top. I think @bhunted has a valid point with fake news. But I also know how gubment works.... and @Vicious experience is distasteful Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Ray 3,566 Posted August 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Zeke said: I know, it's lonely at the top. I think @bhunted has a valid point with fake news. But I also know how gubment works.... I think Glock and S&W are behind this. Jealousy is a motha effa. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeke 5,504 Posted August 8, 2017 8 minutes ago, Ray Ray said: I think Glock and S&W are behind this. Jealousy is a motha effa. Beretta has the most probable... but you're a b fan Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Ray 3,566 Posted August 8, 2017 1 minute ago, Zeke said: Beretta has the most probable... but you're a b fan True, but everyone assumed it was going to be S&W or Glock. But here comes the latest polymer wonder 9 and ruined their wet dream. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeke 5,504 Posted August 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, Ray Ray said: True, but everyone assumed it was going to be S&W or Glock. But here comes the latest polymer wonder 9 and ruined their wet dream. Apx is modular also... 4 minutes ago, Ray Ray said: True, but everyone assumed it was going to be S&W or Glock. But here comes the latest polymer wonder 9 and ruined their wet dream. Apx is modular also Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Persona non grata 113 Posted August 8, 2017 I wonder if anyone has done the same test on other striker 9's? I would love to see competitors tested in the same way. Maybe Sig will be releasing tabbed safety triggers? They apparently designed them, but doesn't seem they put them on many guns. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krdshrk 3,877 Posted August 8, 2017 4 hours ago, mattm754 said: I wonder if anyone has done the same test on other striker 9's? I would love to see competitors tested in the same way. Maybe Sig will be releasing tabbed safety triggers? They apparently designed them, but doesn't seem they put them on many guns. Glocks and M&P's definitely don't do that. The trigger safeties help prevent that as well as firing pin blocks, etc. Hammer fired guns can fire like that if the hammer is hit properly... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Parker 213 Posted August 8, 2017 So when dropped, the weight of the trigger overcomes the trigger bar spring, the safety lever spring and the striker safety spring? Wild stuff! 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
raz-0 1,259 Posted August 8, 2017 1 hour ago, Parker said: So when dropped, the weight of the trigger overcomes the trigger bar spring, the safety lever spring and the striker safety spring? Wild stuff! No I doubt that. I suspect the weight of the trigger and trigger bar imparts enough inertia to overcome the drop safety and the inertia on the -pre-loaded striker pulls it off of the sear. The latter wouldn't be a problem if the drop safety remained in place. We'll see what the replacement looks like. It may not even be a new trigger part, it may just be heavier springs in some place, which will make the trigger pull worse. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Screwball 483 Posted August 8, 2017 Hammer fired guns can fire like that if the hammer is hit properly...Very few hammer fired handguns don't utilize a firing pin block... so for most modern hammer fired guns, that is not accurate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krdshrk 3,877 Posted August 8, 2017 37 minutes ago, Screwball said: Very few hammer fired handguns don't utilize a firing pin block... so for most modern hammer fired guns, that is not accurate. True - forgot about that Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Persona non grata 113 Posted August 8, 2017 https://www.sigsauer.com/press-releases/sig-sauer-issues-voluntary-upgrade-p320-pistol/ That didn't take long. Tabbed safety triggers for all? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GRIZ 3,369 Posted August 8, 2017 I find it interesting there are so many people who believe Sig couldn't screw something up. Anyone can screw something up. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeke 5,504 Posted August 8, 2017 12 minutes ago, GRIZ said: I find it interesting there are so many people who believe Sig couldn't screw something up. Anyone can screw something up. Meh, I'm getting a shield now anyway Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krdshrk 3,877 Posted August 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, Zeke said: Meh, I'm getting a shield now anyway I got one recently - I like it. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krdshrk 3,877 Posted August 8, 2017 Too soon for jokes? 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vlad G 345 Posted August 8, 2017 19 hours ago, Ray Ray said: I think Glock and S&W are behind this. Jealousy is a motha effa. So Gaston and Miculek creeped inside the Sig buildings and change the design notes in the middle of the night or are you going to now withdraw your slander? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Ray 3,566 Posted August 8, 2017 55 minutes ago, Vlad G said: So Gaston and Miculek creeped inside the Sig buildings and change the design notes in the middle of the night or are you going to now withdraw your slander? I will NOT! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blksheep 466 Posted August 9, 2017 They tried to deflect... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
High Exposure 5,662 Posted August 9, 2017 7 hours ago, GRIZ said: I find it interesting there are so many people who believe Sig couldn't screw something up. Anyone can screw something up. Especially Cohen. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Screwball 483 Posted August 9, 2017 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2017/08/08/p320-failed-without-even-dropping-no-plans-test/This was nice...I do hope that this is fixed in the military pistols, as even though it is an unlikely chance of it occurring, if tax payer money is going to SIG... I want our military to have the best pistol possible. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Persona non grata 113 Posted August 9, 2017 1 hour ago, Screwball said: http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2017/08/08/p320-failed-without-even-dropping-no-plans-test/ This was nice... I do hope that this is fixed in the military pistols, as even though it is an unlikely chance of it occurring, if tax payer money is going to SIG... I want our military to have the best pistol possible. WTF? Maybe I'll leave the P320 at home the next time I go to the range. Hopefully my VP9 is better than that. Now I'm starting to get angry with Sig. How exactly did this gun pass the drop tests if you can make it go off with a gunsmith's hammer? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krdshrk 3,877 Posted August 9, 2017 Jebus - that hammer test is bad... I kinda wanna test this with other guns too... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites