Redlines 202 Posted September 21, 2017 http://www.guns.com/2017/09/19/silencerco-unleashes-their-50-state-legal-direct-ship-muzzleloader-suppressor-photos/ Is it possible a legal silencer in NJ. Says it has to be shipped to a ffl. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jackandjill 683 Posted September 21, 2017 Question is, how does the company claims to fall outside the following definition ? ------------------------------ NJ 2C:39-1 g.”Firearm silencer” means any instrument, attachment, weapon or appliance for causing the firing of any gun, revolver, pistol or other firearm to be silent, or intended to lessen or muffle the noise of the firing of any gun, revolver, pistol or other firearm. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DeletePLS 178 Posted September 21, 2017 needs to be renamed Maxim 49 lol Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jackandjill 683 Posted September 21, 2017 And change company name to "World Peace and Pink Ponies". Everyone knows name, model & color is what matters in NJ more than actual function or lack there of. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krdshrk 3,872 Posted September 21, 2017 Actually - Maxim 47. NJ/MA/CA already have legislators firing back saying "nope" 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redlines 202 Posted September 22, 2017 http://www.guns.com/2017/09/22/silencerco-puts-maxim-50-sales-in-california-massachusetts-and-new-jersey-on-hold/ NJ strikes again stepping on federal law. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
High Exposure 5,635 Posted September 22, 2017 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JackDaWack 2,894 Posted September 22, 2017 2 hours ago, Redlines said: http://www.guns.com/2017/09/22/silencerco-puts-maxim-50-sales-in-california-massachusetts-and-new-jersey-on-hold/ NJ strikes again stepping on federal law. Stepping on federal law? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redlines 202 Posted September 22, 2017 1 hour ago, JackDaWack said: Stepping on federal law? Federal law does not recognize black powder and air guns as firearms. Where as in NJ a SW 500 mag or a daisy bb pistol is the same thing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JackDaWack 2,894 Posted September 23, 2017 22 hours ago, Redlines said: Federal law does not recognize black powder and air guns as firearms. Where as in NJ a SW 500 mag or a daisy bb pistol is the same thing. That's not stepping on federal law, its simply expanding it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redlines 202 Posted September 23, 2017 1 hour ago, JackDaWack said: That's not stepping on federal law, its simply expanding it. Should have said stepping on the constitution, there that better. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
njJoniGuy 2,129 Posted September 23, 2017 6 hours ago, Redlines said: Should have said stepping on the constitution, there that better. The legislators in Trenton go one step further - They wipe their collective asses with the Constitution I hope the SAPPA suit sets them straight 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites