Jump to content
Upfitter21

Defensive handgun ammo

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone, my father is getting his retired LEO CC qualification soon and will start carrying again.  Sadly NJ restricts even retired LEOs to not be able to carry JHP/HP.  For now I told him to just go with Federal 124gr FMJ to qualify and carry with to be safe with, but was wondering what some alternatives were that are also NJ legal and wouldn't cause any troubles.  Also its a G26 Gen 4 he's carrying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a memo to the NJSP from the AFTE that Critical Defense, Federal EFMJ and Corbin PowR Ball are not hollow points. The analysis based on the simple fact that there is no hollow cavity in the nose of the bullet.

That definition may have been thrown into doubt by the ruling in the Aitken case that any bullet that deforms on impact (paraphrase).is considered a dum-dum.

I'd say that the individual outcome of any case based on the hollow point/dum dum statute is dependent on the judge, the prosecutor and the quality of your defense attorney .

Adios,

Pizza Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Griz should chime in here, he's familiar with LEOSA, and I believe the Feds say retired LEO's can carry HP ammo, even in NJ, but wait to see what GRIZ says.

Adios,

Pizza Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Upfitter21 said:

Well in this case does Fed Law supersede NJ law?  Called NJSP Firearms and they stated that the law states that even Retired LEOs cannot carry HP ammo.

Federal law always supercedes state law.  State law can be more restrictive but not contrary to Federal law.  The Federal government itself is not subject to state or local jurisdiction.

LEOSA starts out saying "notwithstanding any state or local law" (paraphrasing).  That means the only state laws that count are the ones we say do.  The only state laws mentioned are those restrictions carry on property and in buildings owned by the state or local government or restrictions put on by private property owners.

LEOSA specifically addresses it's okay to carry hollow points under LEOSA as PK90 stated.  

Some time ago I saw a letter from the NJ AG outlining LEOSA. All seemed well until he said that LEOSA didnt apply to retired LEOs living in NJ and they must get a Retired Police Officer permit ($50 a year to the state).  NJ AG also said no one carrying under LEOSA can carry hollowpoints.  Now IANAL but that pretty much sounds pretty contradictory to me.

So the way I see it if one gets their NJ RPO Permit (the qualification is good for LEOSA, I carry a reduced copy of my qual form in my wallet) and wants to carry hollowpoints you're then carrying under LEOSA not your NJ RPO Permit. Carrying a copy of the qual for is required as LEOSA as you need proof of qualification in the past year of the type of handgun you're carrying.

LEOSA has been around like 15 years or so.  I've known of guys carrying under LEOSA that have been in shooting situations using hollowpoints and not prosecuted for anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Upfitter21 said:

So basically he would be allowed to carry HP/JHP?

Under LEOSA he is.  Under NJ State law he's not.

There are several considerations.  One example is if say he has a unintentional discharge carrying hollowpoints and the situation winds up with him being charged with some, even minor, crime. He can be charged with the hollow points then regardless what LEOSA says.  LEOSA doesn't immunize one from criminal law other than carrying.

He has to decide what he wants to abide by.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • Just a heads-up for anyone who might also be in this situation. I joined USLS mid-April of 2022. Some time after renewing for 2023, I changed email providers, and dutifully reflected my new address on my account page. So, I have been anticipating renewal alerts at my new address, but those never arrived. I logged in to my account the other day, and was surprised to see that my subscription expired that same day. I went to my account main information page, confimed that my email address was correct, then went to the billing page, which showed my previous two payments, but which did not give me any apparent way to pay up for the new year. I requested support using the Customer Service form on the web site, but received no reply. Today I called their support number. Apparently changing the email address from my view of my account page did nothing to change the address that they use internally for billing purposes, including expiration notifications. Maybe they also use that address for replies to the support form, even if a different email address is entered there. Also, my account was set up to auto-renew and charge my credit card without my intervention, but that setting did not show on my account page in any obvious way. So, if you have USLS and have changed your email address since you last renewed, you might want to give them a call to ensure that they send renewal information to your correct address. The prospect of having legal coverage lapse while carrying in NJ was, for me, a less that confidence inspiring experience. I will note that the telephone-based customer service was excellent.
    • F*n imbeciles. They know damned well (or should) that, even if passed by the Colorado Senate and signed into law, virtually that entire load of crap is certain to fail Bruen/Heller scrutiny, and probably sooner, rather than later (SCOTUS). What a monumental waste of time (of course, how much can a dip$h*t's time be worth, anyway?) and energy. I passed through Colorado a few times in the 70s, and visited some clients there in the 80's & 90's, and, even by the end of that period, I had the impression that it was politically fairly conservative (with a few exceptions such as Aspen). WTF happened?
    • The rifle permit is just an add-on to your hunting license. No separate course required.
    • Ahhh ... Chicken Wing ! It works when you practice it.  Nice unsupported offhand, sir.
×
×
  • Create New...