Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is a lot of pro-gun info in the article. Nice job on the interview!

Unsurprisingly the article is pretty biased overall. 

You would think domestic-violence groups would be more balanced on their stance. I would imagine the victims of DV would benefit more from legal ownership/carry than the perpetrators. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, ChrisJM981 said:

I tried to contact the author for clarification on where the part about getting a gun in PA came from, but I didn't see any contact information. Am I being unreasonable expecting reporters to research their facts before printing an article? At least someone called out that fictional scenario in the comments section. 

If they work for Gannett you can bet there will be gross incompetence. Gannett only keeps the low hanging fruit.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They fellow Brett from the nanny group mixed acquiring a pistol with acquiring a permit to carry.  Additionally, one cannot go to another state to acquire that pistol unless they have residence.   They should have fact checked that and either deleted it or said the guy doesn’t know what he’s talking about. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The domestic violence issue was among the many Amanda (the APP reporter) & I spoke about.  She was completely BLOWN AWAY by the info I gave her:

1. about how every gun in a DV household is TAKEN AWAY by the Cops, even the victim's, which leaves the abuser free to do as he/she pleases!  

2.  about the poor bastard in Morris Co. beat-up by his wife, bloodied & sitting on his stoop, watching his entire 200 gun collection being dumped into 5-gal paint pails to be hauled-away & stored in a damp evidence locker.

3.  about how a mere verbal argument between a divorcing couple can lead to a false accusation of abuse & then trigger the confiscation of firearms & subsequent loss of rights.  Also covered the fact that if you don't apply to retrieve your confiscated firearms that translates into losing your 2A rights FOREVER because it triggers a law / ruling on the books.

4.  about how Carol Bowne would be arrested & tried for shooting / killing her abuser that actually killed her in her own driveway since the gun she didn't yet have would only have done her good IF IT WAS ALREADY LOADED & IN HER SUV WITH HER which requires a CARRY PERMIT (the Unicorn in the haystack) instead of merely a "permission slip to purchase"....  So she went to check on her P2P on day #41 after applying and was stabbed to death on day #43.  And then the biggie:  If she lived across the Delaware in PA, she'd have had the gun for 43 days since PA is SHALL ISSUE and would have practiced with it & possibly had a self defense course learning how to defend her life with a firearm!

I gave her the above & a few more examples of how "feel-good" laws can kill people.  Since the story wasn't just about Carol, a lot never made it into the story, but at least I tried!  I have a feeling I'll get called in the future as more gun control stories are written, at which time I'll keep pounding away at the Anti's.

Thanks again for all of your encouragement & support.  I hope I did our side well.

Rosey

http://www.cnjfo.com/join-us 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Similar Content

    • By NJGF
      You can very easily use the NRA ILA link to contact your NJ Assembly Representatives to show your opposition to ACR117/ACR205 which will reject Christie's changes to justifiable need:
       
      https://act.nraila.org/composeletters.aspx?AlertID=1410
       
      The vote is scheduled for today Monday December 19, 2016 at 13:00
    • By Michael1776
      Michael J. Cino is the Chairman of the Constitutional Carry Coalition - we believe that "justifiable need" should be trashed - Please CALL TEN PEOPLE you know in the 5th Congressional District and ASK THEM TO VOTE FOR MICHAEL J. CINO IN THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY JUNE 7 AgainstTheEstablishment.com
      Then ask them to CALL TEN PEOPLE THEMSELVES

      and then ask those TEN to call TEN PEOPLE to Vote for Michael J. Cino in the 5th Congressional District on June 7 - it's the only way we are going to get rid of "justifiable need" and change the gun laws in New Jersey AgainstTheEstablishment.com
    • By mattio41
      Greetings,
       
      I wanted to bring to your attention to a letter writing campaign. The "Justifiable Need" Project has kicked off a a campaign to write to your legislators asking them to support the Citizens Protection Act. Assembly Bill A3931 and Senate bill 1287. Everything is already filled out for you, all you have to do is, find your district, download the letters, sign and physically "Snail Mail" them. 
       
      The goal is to pressure our elected legislators to support our right to self defense, or to put it in writing, why they will not. Once that data is collected, it will be used in future campaigns.
       
      "You may ask, why not just send an email?
       
      That is actually a good question. The answer is that even though email is monitored, it is usually monitored by an intern who, after a few emails with the same subject, may not open or log them but just go ahead and bulk archive them for storage…unread. How likely is it that they will be seen by your Assemblyman or Senator?
       
      “Snail Mail” (USPS), on the other hand, has to be opened, stamped as received, categorized, and logged in. It must then be physically placed into someone’s inbox to be processed".
       
      The page can be found at www.justifiableneed.com/action. 
       
      Thank you for your consideration.
       
      Matthew Andras
      President
      Coalition of New Jersey Firearm Owners
      www.justifiableneed.com
      www.facebook.com/cnjfo
       

    • By Ramup422
      Daniel Spafford is a Rutgers law school 3L and is slated to become a lawyer in the Spring of 2015. You can read his article in its entirety at www.justifiableneed.com under the "opinions" tab.
       
      It talks about the Shaneen Allen case, the Brian Aitken case and the fight of Albert Almeida that is fighting for carry rights of all in NJ.
       
       
    • By Ramup422
      We are now entering phase 2 of this #2A campaign for NJ permits to carry gun “rights”. My case is scheduled for the 19th of this month to be heard at Sussex Co. Superior Court. Although I have hired the law firm of @Evannappen, I am confident that Richard Gilbert will present a very good argument on my behalf. Of course there is a 50/50 chance of us prevailing, but I am a realist and I place my odds more at 95/5. The low odds are not because of my case and arguments, but because that is just how NJ rolls on this issue.
       
      We have 2 other good cases pending on this issue in NJ, one is in NJ, and the other one waiting may be heard by SCOTUS. Even though these two other pending cases are strong, they do not have a police reported, documented death threat like it does for my case. For this is the reason why this case must continue to move forward. We must prove that in NJ, regardless if you have a profession that involves large amounts of cash and you fear of becoming a victim to an armed robber, if you are a good, law abiding citizen in NJ that wants a handgun for everyday defense of your life or a loved one, or if you are a person like me that has a documented credible death and robbery threat against you, in NJ you are not afforded your 2A right to defend yourself with a handgun outside of your home.
       
      We must continue litigation against the unjust “Justifiable Need” Admin code in NJ, regardless of how many cases are pending and of the outcome of my case on the 19th, this campaign must continue fighting for us all in NJ and that is my plan.
      Without your support, this may not be possible to continue moving forward and we will allow NJ’s unjust laws to prevail. Please help me fund this litigation so that we all have a chance of winning here.
       
      Even though I am a NRA Life Endowment member and a member of many more gun rights groups like SAF, GOA, NAGR, I have not received any financial support from these groups for this case, this can also be said for other NJ 2nd amendment rights groups in NJ that have not stepped forward and endorsed or supported this campaign for our gun rights.
       
      I have received financial donations and or verbal support from great Americans like you and other professional establishments like @GunforHire @Anthony colandro, I am completely independent in this campaign for now and I am relying on your support in helping this campaign move to the next phase 3
       
      If you donate $100.00 or more, I will send you a free one day guest pass to Woodland Park at gun for hire shooting range.
      RISE UP AND FIGHT WITH ME, or get out of my way because we are growing stronger each day!
      Thank you all that have and will continue to support this battle, Albert Almeida battling for NJ CCW 2A Rights and Liberties
      Please visit me at: http://www.gofundme.com/Fighting-for-NJ-CCW
  • Posts

×
×
  • Create New...