Jump to content
Malice4you

Just two guns for the rest of your life

Recommended Posts

If you're limited to two guns and there are no gun laws I'd still pick a M4A1 and a 4" 357 (686 or GP100).

The M4A1 takes care of a lot of needs.  Easily engages SD targets out to 200 meters.  If they are at 200 meters I stand a good chance of just getting away rather than engaging them.

The 5.56 will easily take game up to deer size.  Eskimos, Native Aklaskans, or whatever they want to be called use 5.56 for polar bear and walrus so it'll work for that.

357? Low capacity yes!  But that is a backup to the M4 with 30 or 40 Rd capacity. Remember the criteria "no gun laws".  I'll just open carry my M4.  Inconvenient?  I don't think so I did it with a M16 almost every day for a year. African carry is very quick with a long gun.  I was doing it 50 years ago but didn't know there was a name for it.   If I'm going into a fight I want a long gun. I agree with @High Exposure uses for full auto are very limited. I have the option if I need it though.

The 357.  Really a backup to the M4.  I can shoot small game with 38 wad cutters without blowing them to pieces.  I can use 357s with no issue for SD.  I can use std 38s, +p, +p+, as intermediate power levels.  You don't have that option with semiautos. Although there are no gun laws, the 4" 357 is not too big to conceal but big enough to hit well.

9s, 40s, 45s, don't have the flexibility of the 357.  Peter Capstick Hathaway (I'm showing my age!) used a 357 to kill a cape buffalo.

Reloads with a 357?  Using speed loaders they're very quick.  Most would be surprised at what a skilled revolver shooter will do from loops or a 2x2 pouch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, GRIZ said:

 

The 357.  Really a backup to the M4.  I can shoot small game with 38 wad cutters without blowing them to pieces.  I can use 357s with no issue for SD.  I can use std 38s, +p, +p+, as intermediate power levels.  You don't have that option with semiautos. 

You need a reloading setup...

Maybe not the same names are used, but I have loaded .223 from screaming hot to subsonic.  The option is definitely there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Bully said:

You need a reloading setup...

Maybe not the same names are used, but I have loaded .223 from screaming hot to subsonic.  The option is definitely there.

 

I'm referring to off the shelf ammo there.

I've been reloading for about 45 years.  Try reloading a 125 gr 9mm bullet down to 600 fps that will reliably work the action.  I can load a 125 gr 357 from 600 to 1500 fps in the 357.  I've never been a fan of "screaming hot" loads.  I've seen too many guns come apart in such quests.  No desire to turn a 5.56 into a 22-250 or a 9mm into a 357 magnum.  I've always felt if you need more power just get more gun.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, GRIZ said:

 

I'm referring to off the shelf ammo there.

I've been reloading for about 45 years.  Try reloading a 125 gr 9mm bullet down to 600 fps that will reliably work the action.  I can load a 125 gr 357 from 600 to 1500 fps in the 357.  I've never been a fan of "screaming hot" loads.  I've seen too many guns come apart in such quests.  No desire to turn a 5.56 into a 22-250 or a 9mm into a 357 magnum.  I've always felt if you need more power just get more gun.

Do you have any salt? My foot is rather bland. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going with Mossberg 500 in 12ga. 24" barrel. Can shoot birdshot, buckshot and slugs. 

Handgun would be Glock 19. 

Parts are readily available and everyone sells 12ga and 9mm ammo. 

 

If we can go one platform with multiple barrels/uppers

I'd go with a sig with 9mm and 22 upper. And  for long gun a T/C Encore with multiple barrels....22, 12ga, .223, .300 win mag. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • I very seriously doubt this has anything to do with terrorism.    1) Harbor pilots are VERY seriously vetted, and highly trained. Not to mention extremely well paid. My experience knowing a few of them, and knowing how they are recruited and screened tells me that there is a slim to highly unlikely chance that a harbor pilot would have participated in anything like that.    2) Maintenance of foreign flag ships is well known to be dubious. Especially these days. These were NOT US flag, Jones act sailors. It was (to my understanding) a largely Indian crew on that ship, with a Ukrainian Captain. Indian crews are not exactly known for being stellar.    3) The bunkers (fuel) these ships use is ‘Bunker C’, which is a heavy, dirty fuel oil that can, and usually is, pretty contaminated. This stuff ain’t your car grade gasoline or diesel fuel. It’s nasty.   It requires nearly constant filter changes and maintenance to the engine/generators. The ship took on fuel prior to departing port, which would stir up all kinds of shit in the fuel tanks, which would contribute to particulates in the fuel lines/filters.    4) I’d say the posting of the chief engineer for Maserek above was pretty spot on as far as chain of events.    This was a shitty accident, with horrible timing and outcome. Not a terror attack. 
    • I saw Lara's interview on Bannon's War Room, and that gave me pause for thought. Her conjecture depends primarily on the veracity of her sources. Regardless, if it's not applicable in any way to this ship disaster, the methods described seem valid to me. And worthy of consideration for the future. As I said before, IMO something is coming. Death by a thousand cuts? Lara Logan Provides Comprehensive Baltimore Update: Experts in Behavioral Analytics, Counter-Terrorism, and National Security Analyze Recent Incident | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
    • Another big windfall for governments'. The 'winner'? Not so much. Mega Millions $1.13 billion winner is facing mega tax bill. The amount is staggering. - nj.com
×
×
  • Create New...