Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
tagonagy

NY Times op-ed on background checks 2/12/18

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mrs. Peel said:

Well, take a scan of the comments and you'll see. They're "outraged" - as usual.

Interesting and I guess not surprising. I guess these people will be again shocked and in tears in 2020 :lol:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NJGF said:

Interesting and I guess not surprising. I guess these people will be again shocked and in tears in 2020 :lol:

I don't share your boundless optimism about 2020. Unless our POTUS learns to calm the hell down, stay off his Twitter account, and focus on "managing" his staff (and reducing chaos and turnover), I think the Dems would have to really screw up "big time" to not win in 2020!  (I'm projecting that, not wishing it).

I don't think the administration's current level of chaos will play well with all but his most loyal fans if it's sustained for 3 more years. It's simply too discordant, distracting and unappealing for most voters.But, that's why I pray for more game-changing SCOTUS app'ts in the next 3 years (even better if it's before mid-terms). Presidents come and go every 4-8 years - but damn, those Supremes stay for a LONG time! In some ways, the Supremes have more impact on Americans' daily lives than POTUS. So, I hope he's able to appoint a few more this term, just in case he's not around for the second... and get some gun business done as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Mrs. Peel said:

I don't share your boundless optimism about 2020. Unless our POTUS learns to calm the hell down, stay off his Twitter account, and focus on "managing" his staff (and reducing chaos and turnover), I think the Dems would have to really screw up "big time" to not win in 2020!  (I'm projecting that, not wishing it).

I don't think the administration's current level of chaos will play well with all but his most loyal fans if it's sustained for 3 more years. It's simply too discordant, distracting and unappealing for most voters.But, that's why I pray for more game-changing SCOTUS app'ts in the next 3 years (even better if it's before mid-terms). Presidents come and go every 4-8 years - but damn, those Supremes stay for a LONG time! In some ways, the Supremes have more impact on Americans' daily lives than POTUS. So, I hope he's able to appoint a few more this term, just in case he's not around for the second... and get some gun business done as well. 

While I agree on the Twitter nonsense (tho I really think Trump uses it to kite ideas directly out to the masses).....the turnover is nothing new.  Its just been 8 years (9, now: actually) since we got to watch a new administration at work.  There is always a lot of jostling at the top; as the people who worked well for a presidential campaign do not necessarily have the same skill sets that are needed once the election is run and the new administration commences their efforts. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, W2MC said:

While I agree on the Twitter nonsense (tho I really think Trump uses it to kite ideas directly out to the masses).....the turnover is nothing new.  Its just been 8 years (9, now: actually) since we got to watch a new administration at work.  There is always a lot of jostling at the top; as the people who worked well for a presidential campaign do not necessarily have the same skill sets that are needed once the election is run and the new administration commences their efforts. 

I disagree! The turnover is unusually high. https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2017-12-28/trumps-white-house-has-highest-turnover-rate-in-40-years

And that data came out of the Brookings Institution - a fairly well-respected think tank in DC that's quoted as much by Conservatives as Liberals. Does the media harp on all of this more than they should? Yes, of course it does. That doesn't erase the fact that it was a VERY bumpy ride for this administration. They really need to smooth that out... if for no other reason than perception is reality (at the polls anyway).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting....wonder how much of this is the 'new administration' turnover, and how much can be called lack of experience, or a lack of Republican Party support? 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why ? Simple, to "look" fair and balanced. Second reason is to tout the "As everyone knows, large percentage of US Population support universal background checks", with fine print pointing to comments from this type of articles. 

 

------------------------

John R. Lott Jr. is the president of the Crime Prevention Research Center and the author, most recently, of “The War on Guns.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...