Jump to content
FishNHard

Picking a bullet for reloading with ????

Recommended Posts

I used to buy all sorts of different brands for rifle.  After many years I decided to stick with Hornady.  I chose Hornady because I like their reloading book. It has lods for all of their bullets.  It has simplified my rifle reloading quite a bit.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're exclusively punching paper with your .308, start with a 168gr HPBT (Sierra or Hornady or Nosler would be my personal first choices) and see which your rifle likes best given the choice of powders (I like Varget, myself) you have.

If you're going to be taking animals out of circulation, I'll leave you to the hunters in this crowd to suggest the proper projectiles and powders to choose from.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, njJoniGuy said:

If you're exclusively punching paper with your .308, start with a 168gr HPBT (Sierra or Hornady or Nosler would be my personal first choices) and see which your rifle likes best given the choice of powders (I like Varget, myself) you have.

If you're going to be taking animals out of circulation, I'll leave you to the hunters in this crowd to suggest the proper projectiles and powders to choose from.

My rifle reloading is all for hunting and plinking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bullets are similar to vehicles in the regard that they all have an intended, and somewhat specialized, purpose.  The type of bullet (or ammo) you use depends on the task at hand.  If you are hunting, you need something that will expand and cause a lot of hydrostatic shock.  If you are shooting long range precision, you need a bullet with a high ballistic coefficient.  You will be less concerned with expansion and weight retention and more concerned with punching neat holes in tight groups.

There is no magic bullet that is good for everything.  You need to consider many factors when hand loading.  Bullet weight in relation to barrel twist rate.  Powder burn rate, seating depth that is specific to your rifle.

Do yourself a favor and buy a reloading manual.  It gives you more than basic recipes.  You will gain a lot of insight to the nuances to reloading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hornady and Sierra for accuracy in the 168 gr. HPBT. Big fan of the Speer 125 gr. TNT bullet. It's a sleeper. Accurate in every .30 caliber I've loaded it for. Varget, 4064 and H4895 are my go-to powders.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • I very seriously doubt this has anything to do with terrorism.    1) Harbor pilots are VERY seriously vetted, and highly trained. Not to mention extremely well paid. My experience knowing a few of them, and knowing how they are recruited and screened tells me that there is a slim to highly unlikely chance that a harbor pilot would have participated in anything like that.    2) Maintenance of foreign flag ships is well known to be dubious. Especially these days. These were NOT US flag, Jones act sailors. It was (to my understanding) a largely Indian crew on that ship, with a Ukrainian Captain. Indian crews are not exactly known for being stellar.    3) The bunkers (fuel) these ships use is ‘Bunker C’, which is a heavy, dirty fuel oil that can, and usually is, pretty contaminated. This stuff ain’t your car grade gasoline or diesel fuel. It’s nasty.   It requires nearly constant filter changes and maintenance to the engine/generators. The ship took on fuel prior to departing port, which would stir up all kinds of shit in the fuel tanks, which would contribute to particulates in the fuel lines/filters.    4) I’d say the posting of the chief engineer for Maserek above was pretty spot on as far as chain of events.    This was a shitty accident, with horrible timing and outcome. Not a terror attack. 
    • I saw Lara's interview on Bannon's War Room, and that gave me pause for thought. Her conjecture depends primarily on the veracity of her sources. Regardless, if it's not applicable in any way to this ship disaster, the methods described seem valid to me. And worthy of consideration for the future. As I said before, IMO something is coming. Death by a thousand cuts? Lara Logan Provides Comprehensive Baltimore Update: Experts in Behavioral Analytics, Counter-Terrorism, and National Security Analyze Recent Incident | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
    • Another big windfall for governments'. The 'winner'? Not so much. Mega Millions $1.13 billion winner is facing mega tax bill. The amount is staggering. - nj.com
×
×
  • Create New...