It's on the calendar: NJ magazine ban injunction! ORAL ARGUMENT REQUIRED for the 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Motion set for 7/12/2018 2:30 PM in Trenton

[gunforhire 826]

http://www.thekaplanblog.com/cases-of-interest/nj-magazine-ban-lawsuit/

[njJoniGuy 2,131]

Sheridan, Peter G.

Born 1950 in Cambridge, MA

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
Nominated by George W. Bush on February 14, 2005, to a seat vacated by Stephen M. Orlofsky. Confirmed by the Senate on June 8, 2006, and received commission on June 12, 2006. Assumed senior status on June 14, 2018.

Education:
St. Peter`s College, B.S., 1972
Seton Hall University School of Law, J.D., 1977

Professional Career:

Law clerk, Hon. James J. Petrella, Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County, 1977-1978
Attorney, Office of the New Jersey Solicitor, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 1978-1981
Private practice, New Jersey, 1981-1984, 1990-2006
Vice president and general counsel, Atlantic City Casino Association, 1984-1987
Director of authorities unit, Office of Gov. Thomas Kean, New Jersey, 1987-1990
Executive director, New Jersey Republican State Committee, 1993-1994

Other Nominations/Recess Appointments:

Nominated to U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, November 5, 2003; no Senate vote

[DirtyDigz 1,812]

If you want to attend:

7/16/18 11:00 AM Trenton Courtroom 4E

Clarkson S. Fisher Bldg & U.S. Courthouse

402 East State Street

Trenton, NJ 08608

”GPS Address”:

24 Merchant St

Trenton, NJ 08608

 

 

 

[JHZR2 56]

Is there any benefit to going?  If so I'm interested in making plans. 

[Zeke 5,504]

17 minutes ago, JHZR2 said:

Is there any benefit to going?  If so I'm interested in making plans. 

You’ll get to see if the state feels you’re a subject or a citizen 

[Krdshrk 3,877]

12 minutes ago, Zeke said:

You’ll get to see if the state feels you’re a subject or a citizen 

I can tell you right now which one it is.

[Zeke 5,504]

10 minutes ago, Krdshrk said:

I can tell you right now which one it is.

Why are you giving it away.

[gunforhire 826]

DATE AND TIME CHANGE - 7/12/2018 2:30 PM in Trenton - Courtroom 4E before Judge Peter G. Sheridan.

 

And yes they treat us less than dirt!.

 

Ant

[JHZR2 56]

10 minutes ago, Zeke said:

You’ll get to see if the state feels you’re a subject or a citizen 

We will see this judge's interpretation related to that. 

Not sure having people in the stands is supposed to influence that.  

Depending whom else is present though...

[Zeke 5,504]

7 minutes ago, JHZR2 said:

We will see this judge's interpretation related to that. 

Not sure having people in the stands is supposed to influence that.  

Depending whom else is present though...

You won’t influence anything.. this is but the first step. Could be recessed or outright dismissed. But if you do attend, carry yourself in the audience civily, professionally. Everytown, MDA, and LMSM will be there . No question 

[ChrisJM981 924]

2 hours ago, Zeke said:

You’ll get to see if the state feels you’re a subject or a citizen 

He's a Republican appointee. Does this go the en banc route if the state loses, or is his decision binding?

[Zeke 5,504]

20 minutes ago, ChrisJM981 said:

He's a Republican appointee. Does this go the en banc route if the state loses, or is his decision binding?

It’s an injunction.. in layman’s “ pause for further litigation “

hope that helps

[Zeke 5,504]

Hearing..

[voyager9 3,434]

4 hours ago, Krdshrk said:

I can tell you right now which one it is.

Cmon man. Spoiler tag. 

Why is the injunction in front of a state judge if the lawsuit is federal?

edit: never mind. He’s a federal judge. 

[Zeke 5,504]

49 minutes ago, voyager9 said:

Cmon man. Spoiler tag. 

Why is the injunction in front of a state judge if the lawsuit is federal?

edit: never mind. He’s a federal judge. 

Dis like this post

reason: v9 is smerter 

[1LtCAP 4,263]

2 hours ago, Zeke said:

It’s an injunction.. in layman’s “ pause for further litigation “

hope that helps

but if an injunction's granted, that means that we can still use our evil 15 rounders?

[Zeke 5,504]

3 minutes ago, 1LtCAP said:

but if an injunction's granted, that means that we can still use our evil 15 rounders?

Guy I’m still using mine till October. And have been. Cmon bud.. you know this. Stop feeding the paranoia 

[voyager9 3,434]

18 minutes ago, Zeke said:

Guy I’m still using mine till October. And have been. Cmon bud.. you know this. Stop feeding the paranoia 

I’ve been using mine as much after the law was signed as before. Which unfortunately is zero. Doesn’t mean I want to be a test case though.  

Paranoia isn’t necessarily bad, especially knowing this state.  Whether it changes your behavior is really up to you. 

[Zeke 5,504]

2 minutes ago, voyager9 said:

I’ve been using mine as much after the law was signed as before. Which unfortunately is zero. Doesn’t mean I want to be a test case though.  

Paranoia isn’t necessarily bad, especially knowing this state.  Whether it changes your behavior is really up to you. 

Ya.. we all know you never shoot.

did you guys even read what was signed?

and please... nobody call the AG or Bob’s range ffs.

[voyager9 3,434]

So back on the topic of the injunction. If granted would allow the possession/use. Maybe with only 10-rounds loaded. Also asking to defer the compliance period while the injunction is in place. 

Quote

The Court should grant Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, and it should preliminarily en- join the 10-round magazine limit in its entirety. In the alternative, and at a minimum, Plaintiffs request that the Court enter an injunction that would allow individuals to lawfully retain magazines already in their possession without having to alter them, so long as they load them with at most 10 rounds of ammunition.

Finally, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court rule on their motion well in advance of end of the 180-day compliance period and, to the extent the Court grants an injunction, that it also toll the running of the compliance period while the injunction is in place. This is necessary to ensure adequate time for Plaintiffs both to pursue this litigation without sacrificing their rights and to avail themselves of the disposal options provided by the statute if necessary.