SCOTUSBlog: Judge Kavanaugh and the Second Amendment
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items
-
Supporting Vendors
-
-
Latest Topics
-
-
-
Similar Content
-
CNJFO files Amicus "Friend-of-the-Court" Brief to SCOTUS for Cheeseman "Justifiable Need Carry Case!By Smokin .50
BREAKING!!
CNJFO FILES AMICUS BRIEF FOR CHEESEMAN CASE!!
by Black Wire Media Thursday July 18, 2019 www.cnjfo.com/join-us
TOGETHER WE MAKE HISTORY! For the second time this year, and with the help & support of our members, sponsors, friends and those who contributed to our Lawsuit Fund, the Coalition of New Jersey Firearm Owners is proud to announce that on behalf of all legal firearm owners in NJ, we've officially filed a "friend-of-the-Court" brief explaining to SCOTUS why NJ GUN LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL! This brief strongly supports Mark Cheeseman's case highlighting the abuse of the NJ gun owner by subjecting him/her to the patently ILLEGAL "Justifiable Need" Rule that prevents carrying self defense weapons outside of your home or business using a "case-by-case basis" as was made ILLEGAL via the Dick Heller decision 11 years ago!
We're proud of everyone that helped bring this amicus brief to fruition, especially our well-known 2nd Amendment Patriots, Attorneys Alan Beck and Stephen Stamboulieh. Their tireless efforts and keen insight combined with historical documentation discovered by our own member Jay Factor, resulted in this historical PLEA FOR RELIEF OF PERSECUTION!
Please consider helping us in any way you possibly can: Join or RENEW today, make a donation or planned monthly gift, or buy an apparel item. Every dollar counts! Thanks EVERYONE for helping to make this happen! ON TO VICTORY!
THE ENTIRE BRIEF IS READABLE THRU THIS HOT LINK:
https://www.scribd.com/document/418500310/CNJFO-Amicus-Brief-Filed-in-Mark-Cheeseman-carry-petition?fbclid=IwAR0k-SPnAzGR3kKbRGm8_0x1wWQNrmbso8JE1BcNtqqBZFFMcNzSYmxx_Og
CROSS-POSTED FROM OUR CNJFO NEWSWIRE THREAD! ENJOY & HELP US PLEASE!
---Rosey
-
By ChrisJM981
Watch for progress on the Rogers & ANJRPC CCW case vs NJ AG, et al.
This was listed in another thread, but I thought it will need it's own space to avoid hijacking Rosey's CNJFO thread.
https://certpool.com/dockets/18-824?fbclid=IwAR2GBSTRnMnR15m914PMdkd7IYl3vrwjPPAXmw-Mt2Pgz1todMU5Gcc17cY
What are your thoughts? I think we're going to Washington!
-
By NJGF
Supreme Court Asked to Review California’s 10-Day Waiting Period for Gun Purchases
http://www.breitbart.com/california/2017/09/03/supreme-court-review-10-day-waiting-period-gun-purchases/?utm_campaign=coschedule&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=NSSF
In Silvester, et.al. v. California Attorney General Zavier the district initially found that a 10 day waiting period to purchase guns did absolutely nothing to deter a person that already owns a gun from committing an impulsive crime.
Of course the Court of Appeals for the 9th curcuit overturned the district court ruling.
SAF's Alan Gottlieb is now asking SCOTUS to hear the case:
"Remember what Senior Judge Anthony Ishii of the U.S. District Court said in his original order, that the state has tacit knowledge that a protected Second Amendment right is burdened by the waiting period law. His comparison of the waiting period to prior restraint is a point that should grab the attention of every journalist who has ever defended the First Amendment while disdaining the Second. A civil right is a right, and all rights are equal and deserve equal protection."
-
By NJGF
This Law Could Make or Break High-Capacity Magazine Bans
http://www.realclearpolicy.com/articles/2017/08/16/this_law_could_make_or_break_high-capacity_magazine_bans.html
'California’s Proposition 63 presents a rare opportunity for the Court to step in and make clear that if Americans have a right to any weapon “in common lawful use,” that includes the whole weapon — not just the parts that don’t frighten the California legislature.'
The article lays out clearly why magazine bans are unconstitutional under both the second amendment and the fifth amendment "Takings Clause".
This case could obviously directly help New Jersey.
-
By NJGF
Second Amendment challenge to New York state stun gun ban
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/12/07/second-amendment-challenge-to-new-york-state-stun-gun-ban/?utm_term=.8affecbeea72&wpisrc=nl_volokh&wpmm=1
A law suit was filed that challenges New York's stun gun ban based on second amendment issues.
The filing is here:
http://14544-presscdn-0-64.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/New-York-sued-in-federal-court-over-Taser-ban.pdf
The suit cites Heller, McDonald, and the more recent Caetano v. Massachusetts decision.
If NY falls then maybe NJ will be next.
-
-
Posts
-
-
