Jump to content
capt14k

Prices of Black Rifles

Recommended Posts

Just now, capt14k said:

 


True but the turnout numbers weren't way off. 200k. Last 6 elections have fluctuated between 220k-360k and it's not just Presidential Election years where turnout is higher. I would have to spend some more time researching the demographics of the district. The losses by the Progressive Left Wing candidates was the bigger story last night, along with the solid showings in WA especially WA8.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Yes turnout was high... Very high in Dem areas.  Its more who turned out..   Angry people tend to vote more.... People who are sorta happy and do not.  Trump saved OH12 but helping turn out.
   in regards to the Progressives they lost big time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also on OH12 Trump shouldn't take credit for it. Wasn't a great win and I think Kasich deserves the credit being it was his former district.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

you've got a lovely bunch of coconuts


No that's not how it's done. You are supposed to post things like

I eat bugs, bugs taste good.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, capt14k said:

Also on OH12 Trump shouldn't take credit for it. Wasn't a great win and I think Kasich deserves the credit being it was his former district.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Kasich no doubt helped....  He was a bit late in his endorsement. But do not discount trumps help as well.  

The left runs people who are moderates but proclaim socialism..

Stupid thing about this is 3 more months we will have this election all over again.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes turnout was high... Very high in Dem areas.  Its more who turned out..   Angry people tend to vote more.... People who are sorta happy and do not.  Trump saved OH12 but helping turn out.

   in regards to the Progressives they lost big time.

 

Thats the thing turnout was only lower by 20k votes compared to some previous midterms.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, capt14k said:

 


Thats the thing turnout was only lower by 20k votes in some previous midterms.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

It comes down to where the turn out was.. Sadly CNN seems to have the best coverage when it comes to breaking down areas...  Seems it not partisan just math.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It comes down to where the turn out was.. Sadly CNN seems to have the best coverage when it comes to breaking down areas...  Seems it not partisan just math.
 


I noticed that as well. Fox News sucked as far as breaking down the vote. They did say the richest County turnout was on pace and that's what put GOP over the top. However CNN was also trying to spin WA vote by saying if you add up all the Democrat vote getters the top GOP candidate only won by a couple points.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, capt14k said:

 


I noticed that as well. Fox News sucked as far as breaking down the vote. They did say the richest County turnout was on pace and that's what put GOP over the top. However CNN was also trying to spin WA vote by saying if you add up all the Democrat vote getters the top GOP candidate only won by a couple points.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Cnn seems to always do a batter job and breaking down live.... But the bias in the coverage is astonishing.  But math is math

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, capt14k said:

So testing is a waste of money. Can't call yourself conservative if you are willing to accept pissing away money on anything which includes the military.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 

NOT a waste of money...If you're gonna stay on-top, you gotta keep up with what is going on out-there in small-arms land.

 

3 hours ago, GRIZ said:

 

3 hours ago, remixer said:

I still think based on financials of changing over we will stick with 5.56 in most cases.

 

I agree.

I agree as well.  Between M16's and M4's, the US military has a HUGE investment in small arms, and an even bigger pile of 5.56 ammo for 'em.  While it's nice to keep up with what's going on in small-arms land, what's out there has to be a WHOLE LOT better than the M4/M16/5.56 platform before they're gonna move off of it.

  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, what about this heat?
Are the Rothschild's still controlling the climate?
Nah climate is cyclical. They control the banking system which leads to a lot of other control.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As to staying on top military spending needs to be cut dollar for dollar with entitlements. We can start with unnecessary research, assuming there are no issues with 5.56. Don't see why we need to look at any other ammo. We have 7.62NATO and .50BMG. If it isn't broke why fix it?

 

 

Also we need to cut foreign aid to everyone. The best place to start would be countries in violation of US law in regrets to nuclear weapons. That means Israel. The Russian boogeyman influence will step in is as ridiculous as Russia fixed our elections

 

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...