Jump to content
Dawgs

AR Fixed Mag

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, vladtepes said:

my point is what you described does not exist.. the qualifier is not the mags permanency.. the qualifier is that the firearm has the ability to accept a detachable magazine.. 

no mention of effort.. 
no mention of tools.. 

the simple ability to even accept a detachable magazine.. qualifies the gun.. 

I get it, really. It's just indicative of how bad the legislators here are that they keep pulling this B.S.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, PK90 said:

I think we're stretching the arm of the law here. If I invent a magazine for the M1 Garand or Marlin 60, does that restrict those firearms to one evil feature? I hope not. I believe that the statement "ability to accept a detachable magazine" is interpreted as to the current configuration. Although, one must wonder why "ability to accept" was used instead of "has". Hmmm.

Even the dweebs in gov't know that "ability to accept" is more all encompassing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, vladtepes said:

If you knew NOTHING about guns..

were told by a prosecutor the legal standing is “can the gun accept a detachable magazine” 

and you were then shown a detachable magazine going into the gun..

if you being a reasonable person knew nothing about guns.. were not interested in them.. etc..

would you not accept that you just saw something that fell under the scope of the law?

I would fervently hope that the lawyer at the other table would point out the simple absurdity of the whole "scary, dangerous" etc crap. Even uninformed people on the jury, if reasonable and reasonably intelligent, would see the folly in going along with such selective use of the phrases by the prosecutor.

I know, letter of the law and all that,,,,,Brings me back to the posting a bit back about the other "N" word. nullification. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PK90 said:

I think we're stretching the arm of the law here. If I invent a magazine for the M1 Garand or Marlin 60, does that restrict those firearms to one evil feature? I hope not. I believe that the statement "ability to accept a detachable magazine" is interpreted as to the current configuration. Although, one must wonder why "ability to accept" was used instead of "has". Hmmm.

BM 59

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the inexpensive nature of lowers and lower build kits, if you really needed to have stock adjustability, you could just build 6 completed lowers and call it a day.  For me and mine. we have 3 identical rifles, just with different LOP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, sota said:

Given the inexpensive nature of lowers and lower build kits, if you really needed to have stock adjustability, you could just build 6 completed lowers and call it a day. 

Think about that for just a second, and how absolutely screwed up the laws are in this state.

A adjustable stock is So Dangerous, that you need to build multiple lowers just so different people can comfortably shoot at the range..

It's beyond nuts!!!!!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sota said:

Given the inexpensive nature of lowers and lower build kits, if you really needed to have stock adjustability, you could just build 6 completed lowers and call it a day.  For me and mine. we have 3 identical rifles, just with different LOP.

crazy talk.. my trigger alone was like $200.. plus the rest of the parts.. stock.. etc.. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, vladtepes said:

crazy talk.. my trigger alone was like $200.. plus the rest of the parts.. stock.. etc.. 

I think his point was, you build what you want for yourself, then build a basic one that you can swap out the lower for when you bring family members or friends, if LOP is important. Would an occassional shooter care about a $200 trigger?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...