Jump to content
ChrisJM981

Thomas R. Rogers and ANJRPC v. Gurbir S. Grewal, et al

Recommended Posts

 So when do we find out if scotus will take it.      the communists and fifth columnists throughout NJ and the US are countering every suit fairly successfully by either not appealing or by issuing a permit.      I don't see much in this one that wasn't in any of the others, are there any other "good" ones going up to SC.    NYC seemed to figure out how to keep theirs from going to scotus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, revenger said:

 So when do we find out if scotus will take it.      the communists and fifth columnists throughout NJ and the US are countering every suit fairly successfully by either not appealing or by issuing a permit.      I don't see much in this one that wasn't in any of the others, are there any other "good" ones going up to SC.    NYC seemed to figure out how to keep theirs from going to scotus.

NY briefing has not been stayed yet.  In fact the petitioners have requested that the motion be denied.  Would be great if SCOTUS denied the motion and said nice try NY.

As for NJ the court will now schedule it for conference.  Should be soon.  I would think it will go to conference within next couple weeks.  Then it’s just a matter of how many conferences it takes for them to make a decision...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎4‎/‎19‎/‎2019 at 6:58 PM, Smokin .50 said:

Why not a bunch of denials?  Here's why:  Too many PUSSIES were afraid of a denial costing them the ability to apply for more P2P's!  OMG, what do I do if they ask me about a denial?

FACT:  No matter how many times Almeida was denied, he explained it all away and there was NO delay in processing P2P's.  Ever.

The Stockholm Syndrome is strong here...

I got my denial last year. It's too expensive to do again so soon. You have to do anothe Morphotrak background check ($$) and then qualify with the guns you want to carry at 50-60 rounds each (more $$). The staff at GFH blinked hard when I told them how many quals I wanted to run.

  • Informative 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using the wait and see argument with NY and MA is a specious one. I have tried to find out the number of CCW permits in NJ and was told that information is private.  So how we supposed to find out how limited we are.  Also Heller  was started  because WASH DC would not let you carry a handgun from room to room let alone outside. 

If the present conservative  court does not grant to hear our case with AG's weak argument, I don't know  if we ever will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, drjjpdc said:

Using the wait and see argument with NY and MA is a specious one. I have tried to find out the number of CCW permits in NJ and was told that information is private.  So how we supposed to find out how limited we are.  Also Heller  was started  because WASH DC would not let you carry a handgun from room to room let alone outside. 

f the present coservative  court does not rant to hear  our case with AG's weak argument, I don't know  if we ever will.

I hate this state. When I'm at my home in Florida I can carry everyday almost anywhere. When I'm back here in NJ I can't have a gun when I leave my store late at night and drive home.  The gun laws in this state are nuts.  They really do favor the criminals.  When you visit a gun store in a free state or a gun show you really realize how crazy NJ is. 

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, DirtyDigz said:

I feel it’s much better written than the scribble Turban Man submitted. Much more convincing. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a big smile on my face.  Even if cert isn't granted, I really feel like these guys did a great job.  In particular, I like the response to NJ's assertion that there is no evidence regarding the percentage of permits granted: it doesn't matter.  The law is unconstitutional on its face because it de facto differentiates between people with a special, "justifable need" and "ordinary citizens".  The footnote is a nice touch, pointing out that the percentages are likely irrelevant because most people are discouraged from ever applying and going through and onerous and expensive process because they know they will be denied.

I've been disappointed so many times, but I will venture to say that I am optimistic about this.  It seems that with Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch cert should be granted since you need 4 justices to grant-- I will actually be shocked if it isn't.  Roberts has unfortunately become rather scary, and I worry that if cert is granted he could flip, but hard to believe that a Justice who signed onto Heller and Mcdonald would let this flagrantly unconstitutional law to stand.  I could see him insisting on as narrow a holding as possible.  We will see. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, PDM said:

I have a big smile on my face.  Even if cert isn't granted, I really feel like these guys did a great job.  In particular, I like the response to NJ's assertion that there is no evidence regarding the percentage of permits granted: it doesn't matter.  The law is unconstitutional on its face because it de facto differentiates between people with a special, "justifable need" and "ordinary citizens".  The footnote is a nice touch, pointing out that the percentages are likely irrelevant because most people are discouraged from ever applying and going through and onerous and expensive process because they know they will be denied.

I've been disappointed so many times, but I will venture to say that I am optimistic about this.  It seems that with Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch cert should be granted since you need 4 justices to grant-- I will actually be shocked if it isn't.  Roberts has unfortunately become rather scary, and I worry that if cert is granted he could flip, but hard to believe that a Justice who signed onto Heller and Mcdonald would let this flagrantly unconstitutional law to stand.  I could see him insisting on as narrow a holding as possible.  We will see. 

I will read the response brief shortly, however, I agree with your assessment.  I'm very optimistic that the true rule of law will be interpreted appropriately.  My wish is for Justice Kavanaugh to write the opinion and stick it solely into the chest of one Cory Booker, who made a mockery of his confirmation hearing.  No way Kavanaugh forgets Booker and payback/karma will be rightfully bestowed.  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice job on the petitioner's reply by Dan Schmutter and colleagues.

I too would handicap SCOTUS like PDM.  The wild card is Roberts and I'm sure he is wrestling with the impact on the country, given its current state of political division, if the Court forces all the blue states to allow some form of carry outside the home.  Libturd heads would explode everywhere.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Princetonian58 said:

Nice job on the petitioner's reply by Dan Schmutter and colleagues.

I too would handicap SCOTUS like PDM.  The wild card is Roberts and I'm sure he is wrestling with the impact on the country, given its current state of political division, if the Court forces all the blue states to allow some form of carry outside the home.  Libturd heads would explode everywhere.

Agree.  However, Roberts needs to follow the Constitution.  And must do so with strict scrutiny in our case.  It is not supposed to be about wrestling with any personal views or outside noise.  The 2A is clear and States within the union that attempt to usurp it must be stopped.  

I get your sentiment and I too feel he is the wildcard, but being on the high court, Roberts need to put that stuff aside and rule based on law.  

Hopeful on my end here and for us all.

 

 

Edited by chic013
typo
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok. now.....please pardon if this is jumping the gun(yea, shitty pun intended, lol) and/or stupid. 

 

 so lets presume that this goes to the scotus. scotus strikes down nj's bs. what is the next step? can/will nj appeal? if they can't, can they then impose more stupidity to still make it nearly impossible or overly difficult for us?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, 1LtCAP said:

ok. now.....please pardon if this is jumping the gun(yea, shitty pun intended, lol) and/or stupid. 

 

 so lets presume that this goes to the scotus. scotus strikes down nj's bs. what is the next step? can/will nj appeal? if they can't, can they then impose more stupidity to still make it nearly impossible or overly difficult for us?

Nj probably gets a defined amount of time to rewrite their unconstitutional carry laws. IIRC that's what happened with DC. 

There is no appeal after SCOTUS. 

It depends if SCOTUS addresses the level of scrutiny with which legislation involving the Second Amendment must be examined with. If it's strict scrutiny a lot of their laws will fall. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, 1LtCAP said:

ok. now.....please pardon if this is jumping the gun(yea, shitty pun intended, lol) and/or stupid. 

 

 so lets presume that this goes to the scotus. scotus strikes down nj's bs. what is the next step? can/will nj appeal? if they can't, can they then impose more stupidity to still make it nearly impossible or overly difficult for us?

There's no soaking Scotus.

However, I would expect nj to engage in massive bullshit. Like making the permits incredibly expensive or making permitted carry unlawful in so many locations as to make it useless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, 1LtCAP said:

ok. now.....please pardon if this is jumping the gun(yea, shitty pun intended, lol) and/or stupid. 

 

 so lets presume that this goes to the scotus. scotus strikes down nj's bs. what is the next step? can/will nj appeal? if they can't, can they then impose more stupidity to still make it nearly impossible or overly difficult for us?

 

3 hours ago, raz-0 said:

There's no soaking Scotus.

However, I would expect nj to engage in massive bullshit. Like making the permits incredibly expensive or making permitted carry unlawful in so many locations as to make it useless.

Yes they could require certifications, classes, fees, etc., long waits. They aren’t going down easy. But there’s no appeal. Spartacus and/or the pervert could try to introduce something but not with and likely success. 

My fingers are crossed that this will loosen up the many other rediculous infringements so we can act like adults with our guns. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing to remember about Roberts. He may be less firm on the gun issue. But it is clear that we have a conflict in the Circuit  Courts and he is not one to tolerate having them thumb their nose at the SCOTUS. There is also a trend among the states not to be ignored (Tennessee just passed their own law). This can affect not only NJ, but NY, Mass, etc.

Not only what happened  in DC but IL, where the 7th Circuit gave them about a 100 days or they would re-write the IL law themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, ChrisJM981 said:

Nj probably gets a defined amount of time to rewrite their unconstitutional carry laws. IIRC that's what happened with DC. 

There is no appeal after SCOTUS. 

It depends if SCOTUS addresses the level of scrutiny with which legislation involving the Second Amendment must be examined with. If it's strict scrutiny a lot of their laws will fall. 

Theres always appeal after the SCOTUS.  Hopefully never needed but,

That is exactly what the 2nd was written for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They haven't listed an exact date yet, but they have all the documents from both sides now. Interesting that the NY case has been granted certiorari already, but that doesn't prevent them from hearing both cases and publishing oral arguments on both of them later.

Edited by drjjpdc
too much space

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Similar Content

    • By SMOKIE901
      Can anyone who has a FLORIDA Non-Resident Concealed Carry Permit explain the details on how it is done to obtain?
    • By Smokin .50
      BREAKING!!
      CNJFO FILES AMICUS BRIEF FOR CHEESEMAN CASE!!
      by Black Wire Media Thursday July 18, 2019 www.cnjfo.com/join-us
      TOGETHER WE MAKE HISTORY! For the second time this year, and with the help & support of our members, sponsors, friends and those who contributed to our Lawsuit Fund, the Coalition of New Jersey Firearm Owners is proud to announce that on behalf of all legal firearm owners in NJ, we've officially filed a "friend-of-the-Court" brief explaining to SCOTUS why NJ GUN LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL! This brief strongly supports Mark Cheeseman's case highlighting the abuse of the NJ gun owner by subjecting him/her to the patently ILLEGAL "Justifiable Need" Rule that prevents carrying self defense weapons outside of your home or business using a "case-by-case basis" as was made ILLEGAL via the Dick Heller decision 11 years ago!
      We're proud of everyone that helped bring this amicus brief to fruition, especially our well-known 2nd Amendment Patriots, Attorneys Alan Beck and Stephen Stamboulieh. Their tireless efforts and keen insight combined with historical documentation discovered by our own member Jay Factor, resulted in this historical PLEA FOR RELIEF OF PERSECUTION!
      Please consider helping us in any way you possibly can: Join or RENEW today, make a donation or planned monthly gift, or buy an apparel item. Every dollar counts! Thanks EVERYONE for helping to make this happen! ON TO VICTORY!  
      THE ENTIRE BRIEF IS READABLE THRU THIS HOT LINK:
      https://www.scribd.com/document/418500310/CNJFO-Amicus-Brief-Filed-in-Mark-Cheeseman-carry-petition?fbclid=IwAR0k-SPnAzGR3kKbRGm8_0x1wWQNrmbso8JE1BcNtqqBZFFMcNzSYmxx_Og 


      CROSS-POSTED FROM OUR CNJFO NEWSWIRE THREAD!  ENJOY & HELP US PLEASE!
      ---Rosey
       
       
    • By NJGF
      Judge Kavanaugh and the Second Amendment
      http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/07/judge-kavanaugh-and-the-second-amendment/
      "....Kennedy sided with his more conservative colleagues in finding a Second Amendment right to have a handgun in the home, and there is no reason to believe that Judge Brett Kavanaugh, if confirmed, is likely to disagree"
      "....We know from his recorded dissents from the denial of review that Thomas would vote to review and overturn some existing gun laws, and we know that Gorsuch – at least to some extent – agrees with him. But it takes four votes to grant review in a case, and we do not know whether Roberts and Alito also agree with Thomas but have opted not to say so publicly, or whether they instead are content to leave the court’s gun-rights jurisprudence as it is."
      ".... just this week, the 9th Circuit struck down Hawaii’s ban on carrying weapons openly outside of the home; even if the case goes to the full 9th Circuit, the losing party is almost certain to ask the Supreme Court to weigh in."
    • By stuckinNJ
      https://www.nraila.org/articles/20171201/us-house-of-representatives-to-vote-on-hr-38-the-concealed-carry-reciprocity-act-next-week
       
      please take 60 seconds to call your reps, BOTH Republicans and Dems, urging their support. It seriously takes seconds. 
      No excuses
    • By fslater
      Hi Everyone
      I just Read the article in the Political report in Shooting Illustrated about The July ruling By the US Court Of Appeals that found DC's "good reason" to be granted a CCW unconstitutional. Wouldn't the conflicting rulings between the DC Federal Court and the Jersey District Federal court force the SCOUS to a hearing to resolve the conflict? This is old news from back in July I'm just hearing about now. If its already been discussed  please direct me to the thread.
      Thanks
  • Posts

    • I saw Lara's interview on Bannon's War Room, and that gave me pause for thought. Her conjecture depends primarily on the veracity of her sources. Regardless, if it's not applicable in any way to this ship disaster, the methods described seem valid to me. And worthy of consideration for the future. As I said before, IMO something is coming. Death by a thousand cuts? Lara Logan Provides Comprehensive Baltimore Update: Experts in Behavioral Analytics, Counter-Terrorism, and National Security Analyze Recent Incident | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
    • Another big windfall for governments'. The 'winner'? Not so much. Mega Millions $1.13 billion winner is facing mega tax bill. The amount is staggering. - nj.com
    • Looking to buy some non-corrosive 7.62x39. I'm located in Bergen County.  Please let me know if you have some at a decent price. 
×
×
  • Create New...