Jump to content
ChrisJM981

Thomas R. Rogers and ANJRPC v. Gurbir S. Grewal, et al

Recommended Posts

Just for perspective the NY case was distributed for conference 3 times between the 3rd week of Nov.2018 until 01/14/2019.  The petition for certiorari was finally granted 01/22/2019. It won't be Christmas for a little while yet. And that just means the case will be heard, no guarantee of outcome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My take on what is probable. 

1) they see the case as legally very similar to the NY case and combine the cases into one. If this is the case, I expect it to happen today as I don't believe the schedule allows for much else.

2) they see the only similarity as being the 2nd and the level of scrutiny. In which case it gets relisted until the NY case is done and whatever precedent is set. At that point it gets sent back saying your conclusion is shit, redo this one.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
d5ebd999-f176-494d-9d38-8783f013a91a.jpg
 
U.S. SUPREME COURT DEFERS
ACTION ON ANJRPC CARRY CASE
 
May 28, 2019. Today, the United States Supreme Court took no action on ANJRPC’s challenge to New Jersey’s carry law in the Rogers v. Grewal case. 
 
That means one of two things: either the U.S. Supreme Court will relist the case for consideration at its next conference on May 30, or the Supreme Court will defer its decision on whether to take the appeal pending the outcome of another case. The Supreme Court’s intended course of action will become clearer as the matter unfolds.
 
Please watch for additional ANJRPC alerts as the situation develops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very few decisions are made on petitions at first conference.  Most petitions are relisted several times.  As an example, the Indiana abortion case was relisted 15 times before today's per curiam decision.  The most likely result is it will be relisted for conference next week. 

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Zeke said:

No action. Which most are saying is a good sign. Possibly being put on hold for the ruling on the N.Y. case.

SCOTUS rules on NY case, setting ground rules to use strict scrutiny when ruling on 2A cases. Kicks NJ carry, NJ mag ban, and MA AWB cases back down to circuit courts. Leftists' heads start exploding from the surge of 2A freedom. 

 

One can dream. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, ChrisJM981 said:

SCOTUS rules on NY case, setting ground rules to use strict scrutiny when ruling on 2A cases. Kicks NJ carry, NJ mag ban, and MA AWB cases back down to circuit courts. Leftists' heads start exploding from the surge of 2A freedom. 

 

One can dream. 

Like microwave popcorn!

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Similar Content

    • By SMOKIE901
      Can anyone who has a FLORIDA Non-Resident Concealed Carry Permit explain the details on how it is done to obtain?
    • By Smokin .50
      BREAKING!!
      CNJFO FILES AMICUS BRIEF FOR CHEESEMAN CASE!!
      by Black Wire Media Thursday July 18, 2019 www.cnjfo.com/join-us
      TOGETHER WE MAKE HISTORY! For the second time this year, and with the help & support of our members, sponsors, friends and those who contributed to our Lawsuit Fund, the Coalition of New Jersey Firearm Owners is proud to announce that on behalf of all legal firearm owners in NJ, we've officially filed a "friend-of-the-Court" brief explaining to SCOTUS why NJ GUN LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL! This brief strongly supports Mark Cheeseman's case highlighting the abuse of the NJ gun owner by subjecting him/her to the patently ILLEGAL "Justifiable Need" Rule that prevents carrying self defense weapons outside of your home or business using a "case-by-case basis" as was made ILLEGAL via the Dick Heller decision 11 years ago!
      We're proud of everyone that helped bring this amicus brief to fruition, especially our well-known 2nd Amendment Patriots, Attorneys Alan Beck and Stephen Stamboulieh. Their tireless efforts and keen insight combined with historical documentation discovered by our own member Jay Factor, resulted in this historical PLEA FOR RELIEF OF PERSECUTION!
      Please consider helping us in any way you possibly can: Join or RENEW today, make a donation or planned monthly gift, or buy an apparel item. Every dollar counts! Thanks EVERYONE for helping to make this happen! ON TO VICTORY!  
      THE ENTIRE BRIEF IS READABLE THRU THIS HOT LINK:
      https://www.scribd.com/document/418500310/CNJFO-Amicus-Brief-Filed-in-Mark-Cheeseman-carry-petition?fbclid=IwAR0k-SPnAzGR3kKbRGm8_0x1wWQNrmbso8JE1BcNtqqBZFFMcNzSYmxx_Og 


      CROSS-POSTED FROM OUR CNJFO NEWSWIRE THREAD!  ENJOY & HELP US PLEASE!
      ---Rosey
       
       
    • By NJGF
      Judge Kavanaugh and the Second Amendment
      http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/07/judge-kavanaugh-and-the-second-amendment/
      "....Kennedy sided with his more conservative colleagues in finding a Second Amendment right to have a handgun in the home, and there is no reason to believe that Judge Brett Kavanaugh, if confirmed, is likely to disagree"
      "....We know from his recorded dissents from the denial of review that Thomas would vote to review and overturn some existing gun laws, and we know that Gorsuch – at least to some extent – agrees with him. But it takes four votes to grant review in a case, and we do not know whether Roberts and Alito also agree with Thomas but have opted not to say so publicly, or whether they instead are content to leave the court’s gun-rights jurisprudence as it is."
      ".... just this week, the 9th Circuit struck down Hawaii’s ban on carrying weapons openly outside of the home; even if the case goes to the full 9th Circuit, the losing party is almost certain to ask the Supreme Court to weigh in."
    • By stuckinNJ
      https://www.nraila.org/articles/20171201/us-house-of-representatives-to-vote-on-hr-38-the-concealed-carry-reciprocity-act-next-week
       
      please take 60 seconds to call your reps, BOTH Republicans and Dems, urging their support. It seriously takes seconds. 
      No excuses
    • By fslater
      Hi Everyone
      I just Read the article in the Political report in Shooting Illustrated about The July ruling By the US Court Of Appeals that found DC's "good reason" to be granted a CCW unconstitutional. Wouldn't the conflicting rulings between the DC Federal Court and the Jersey District Federal court force the SCOUS to a hearing to resolve the conflict? This is old news from back in July I'm just hearing about now. If its already been discussed  please direct me to the thread.
      Thanks
  • Posts

×
×
  • Create New...