njJoniGuy 2,129 Posted March 4, 2019 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1263/text?fbclid=IwAR0SM2SChI7F_4ySSRJcS524sk4VNTlWXLp_fDBzK7xuoSXDygKCLrwW0rQ Text of bill: SEC. 2. SEMIAUTOMATIC RIFLE WITH CAPACITY TO ACCEPT DETACHABLE MAGAZINE TREATED AS FIREARM UNDER NATIONAL FIREARMS ACT. (a) In General.—Section 5845(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1) by striking “; and (8) a destructive device.” and inserting “; (8) a destructive device; and (9) a semiautomatic rifle or shotgun that has the capacity to accept a detachable ammunition feeding device.”, and (2) by adding at the end the following: “The term ‘detachable ammunition feeding device’ means an ammunition feeding device that can be removed from a firearm without disassembly of the firearm action. The term ‘ammunition feeding device’ means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device, but does not include an attached tubular device which is only capable of operating with .22 caliber rimfire ammunition. The term ‘semiautomatic rifle or shotgun’ means any repeating rifle or shotgun which utilizes a portion of the energy of a firing cartridge to extract the fired cartridge case and chamber the next round, and which requires a separate pull of the trigger to fire each cartridge.” (b) Applicability.—Any person who, on the date of the enactment of this Act, lawfully owns or possesses a semiautomatic rifle or shotgun (as defined in section 5845(a) of such Code, as amended by this Act) that has the capacity to accept a detachable ammunition feeding device (as defined in such section) shall, not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, register the semiautomatic rifle or shotgun in accordance with section 5841 of such Code. Such registration shall become a part of the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record required to be maintained by such section. The prohibition on possession of an unregistered firearm under section 5861 of such Code shall not apply to possession of such a semiautomatic rifle or shotgun that has the capacity to accept such a detachable ammunition feeding device on any date that is 120 days or less after the enactment of this Act. Talk about an act of war on the American people by its government! MOLON LABE, a$$holes!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeke 5,504 Posted March 4, 2019 They keep talking about a dem President declaring gun violence as a national emergency as a threat, but look what they are doing anyway... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1LtCAP 4,259 Posted March 4, 2019 IS this part of that shit that passed the house? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
njJoniGuy 2,129 Posted March 4, 2019 Not yet. This bill (H.R.1263) has not gotten past the submission stage. And as someone on the National Match forum has said, "Well then, WHY NOT go full auto??" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
124gr9mm 857 Posted March 4, 2019 That's a scary one... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
voyager9 3,417 Posted March 4, 2019 Only if you define “The Fed Govt” as some asshole democrats in the House 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scorpio64 5,120 Posted March 4, 2019 1 hour ago, njJoniGuy said: feeding device’ means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device, Looks like this would effect even M1 Garands. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Regular Guy 264 Posted March 4, 2019 The Great Gopher seems to always want to out-do everyone else when it comes to signing laws that violate 2A. While this may not pass the Senate, our state gov is full of dim-ocrats that would love to pick this up and run it through to become a law. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
voyager9 3,417 Posted March 4, 2019 9 minutes ago, Regular Guy said: The Great Gopher seems to always want to out-do everyone else when it comes to signing laws that violate 2A. While this may not pass the Senate, our state gov is full of dim-ocrats that would love to pick this up and run it through to become a law. The 1-feature bill has been reintroduced every year for a while. NJ doesn’t even bother with NFA-like registration. They just ban them outright. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
njJoniGuy 2,129 Posted March 16, 2019 On 3/4/2019 at 6:56 PM, voyager9 said: The 1-feature bill has been reintroduced every year for a while. NJ doesn’t even bother with NFA-like registration. They just ban them outright. Like Uzis, M1 carbines and FALs thanks to the Florio ban Motherhumpers... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin125 4,772 Posted March 18, 2019 I’d love to see that idiot’s plan to collect those semi auto weapons. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gleninjersey 2,134 Posted March 18, 2019 On 3/4/2019 at 4:54 PM, Zeke said: They keep talking about a dem President declaring gun violence as a national emergency as a threat, but look what they are doing anyway... Was listening to Mark Levine the other day. He explained it well. I'll paraphrase best I can. What Trump is doing is Constitutional. He's using the Emergency Powers Act to enact and support current laws. If the Dems tried to use the Emergency Power Act to ban semi-auto it would be unconstitutional. It would violate current laws. End of paraphrase. Screw more gun laws. You can quote me on that. No need to paraphrase. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites