Jump to content
Ray Ray

Beretta 92X

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, remixer said:

Beretta will do well with these new 92 series pistols... The series itself is Loved and deserves it... Love them.

At some point they might want to play with other calibers as well... maybe a 45acp..

 

 

To me it seems that this gun is geared towards gun games. Yes there is a huge fanbase, but again its years too late for gun games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, ronhonda said:

To me it seems that this gun is geared towards gun games. Yes there is a huge fanbase, but again its years too late for gun games.

I agree.

Though the sliderelease/thumb resty thing could be an advantage... Maybe they get Ben back as a shooter? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Maksim said:

45 ACP?  why?  You well know that this would be wasted money... it's all about the wunder-9 today... can't give away a 40 s&W, aka the Beretta 96.  Plus with the stresses on that open slide.

A 9x in .45 likely would be in the Desert Eagle size range. Might get under crew served weapon... but definitely larger.

9 hours ago, remixer said:

BTW a friend pointed out that beretta did play with polymer the 90 two.

But it really was just a grip sleeve... frame itself was alloy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just kidding.  I like it though.  It is pretty sweet.  I wonder how much thinner the grip is to a standard Beretta 92.  The Brigadier Slide is pretty nice.   This might be a good gun for my wife.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Screwball said:

A 9x in .45 likely would be in the Desert Eagle size range. Might get under crew served weapon... but definitely larger.

But it really was just a grip sleeve... frame itself was alloy.

True but it was a failed attempt to work some poly into the gun... WTF was with the rail cover LOL
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Ray Ray said:

And no optics mount, because everyone is running 3000 dollar guns nowadays.

Well, for gun games, which is where it is aimed at, it should have it...

BUT for the threaded barrel, if the M9A3 has it... for more money this should have it too. =)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Maksim said:

Well, for gun games, which is where it is aimed at, it should have it...

BUT for the threaded barrel, if the M9A3 has it... for more money this should have it too. =)

This wouldn't be geared towards a suppressor host.  

But

Without an optics mount it isn't geared towards gun games either.

 

So?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Ray Ray said:

This wouldn't be geared towards a suppressor host.  

But

Without an optics mount it isn't geared towards gun games either.

 

So?

For gun games I can see someone throwing on a compensator and running it in major/open. Hence... threaded barrel.  Aren't they the same from M9A3?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Maksim said:

For gun games I can see someone throwing on a compensator and running it in major/open. Hence... threaded barrel.  Aren't they the same from M9A3?  

Are what the same?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I only use the 4.9” barrel with the SGS compensator...

I run the one I had shortened by a BerettaForum member to 4.7”, and then had an exaggerated crown done. Prefer it.

25F7F58B-065A-4442-8018-6C4612D0FD44.thumb.jpeg.886030ad073ece83bd3c2ca3e369a2b5.jpeg

It’s a barrel... if you run a suppressor, toss it on. If you aren’t, put the stock one back. Isn’t like you are putting cuts into the slide or something similar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a good thread of opinions, but it is missing a very important one... mine!

Beretta and the 92 are a brand of lineage. This 92X looks like a tremendous gun but also gives off a “twice the sex but half the foreplay” vibe that will turn off some of the Beretta traditionalists. My definition of tricking out a Beretta is below, where I got rid of all the black plastic bits and then hand fitted 92SB-C grips onto this 92FS “A1” compact for a complete stainless gun.

 

tumblr_pojbkbgwxa1wz9o8k_1280.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, PK90 said:

 

92X%20Performance_wholetop.png

Wow wow wow... that’s a 9x21 barrel! If Beretta is being honest with itself, they have TECHNICALLY assembled a “98X” with “92” scribbed on the slide for marketing and brand recognition purposes. Whoopsie!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Ray Ray said:

And no optics mount, because everyone is running 3000 dollar guns nowadays.

That would have been nice.. the Threaded barrel addition is Meh for most people.

11 hours ago, Krdshrk said:

True

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • NJGF members in chat (2)



  • 53 How important is it for you to have your next pistol be "Optics Ready?"

    1. 1. How important is it for you to have your next pistol be "Optics Ready?"


      • Very, (Do not want to pay for slide cutting, Looks cool, etc.)
      • Neutral (don't have a preference either way)
      • Not at all (not a feature I am looking for).
    2. 2. How much are you willing to pay for "Optics ready"? (i.e. gun is cut for an optic)


      • Up to $50
      • $50 to $100
      • $100 to $200
      • $250 or more
      • None. If it is not standard part of the gun, not willing to pay more for a model with it.
    3. 3. Why are you looking for Optics Ready?


      • Planning on adding optic.
      • Want to have the option just in case
      • n/a
    4. 4. Why do you want to add an optic?


      • Looks cool/tactical or someone told me I should
      • Need it for deteriorating eyesight.
      • To compete in certain gun games (USPSA Carry Optics)
      • Other Reasons

  •  

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure if this was mentioned, but it is now impossible to have a reference that does not use email. The form cannot be completed without an email address. Not sure what they do if the email is invalid or they don't answer back. Will they call? Mail? In either case, seems if the email gets lost in the spam you are going to have major delays in getting a permit. They also call your workplace. Talk about breach of privacy! Better hope your boss isn't a vengeful liberal that retaliates against you for owning a gun. Basically, I think the system is technically faster now, but only if you're on top of your references. Get them to check their email same day/next day and answer the questions ASAP. Also means no: non-English speaking references, old folks who don't use email, etc...
    • So when are they going to pass and enforce felony anti-bully laws that make it a felony to bully someone? Bullying, you know, that thing that actually caused some of these shootings, rather than allowed them to happen?
    • Here's the ANJRPC alert, they don't know which ones will actual take a vote: https://www.anjrpc.org/page/ThursFullLegToVoteOnGunOwnerAttacks ....."Thursday’s bill list will be in flux until the very last minute, and one or more of the other bills heard in Assembly committee last week could still be scheduled for a vote in both houses on Thursday.   Accordingly, please immediately contact all member of the Legislature by clicking here. Tell them: (1) Vote NO on “smart guns” (A1016 / S101) – the attempt to swap one mandate for another will doom the technology to failure by pushing gun owners away instead of allowing interest in the technology to develop normally; and (2) Vote NO or to amend on the following bills (if they are scheduled), which either affect only law-abiding citizens (who do not perpetrate crimes and represent a threat to no one), or fail to protect honest citizens from wrongful prosecution under careless wording: A3696 / S2240; A5452 / S3876; A5453 / S3879; A5454 / S3897; and A5455 / S3898.  
    • Funny how the State Legislature's site is down the night before these 12 bills (6 pairs of identical anti 2A bills) come up for a vote??
    • They're fighting tooth and nail to make NJ unattractive to anyone except violent criminals, hood rats, welfare queens, and other democrat supporters. Technically a good long-term strategy to ensure you keep winning: get rid of opposition supporters.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information