Jump to content
Nucrunner

KEL-TEC Gen2 SUB2000

Recommended Posts

I would appreciate any comments as far as whether the KEL-TEC Gen2 SUB2000 is good to go “as is” in NJ? 

Is it a rifle or a Pistol? (Permit other than FID required?)

I understand are some adjustments with the stock, will it be required to be pinned? 

Giving thought to purchase, would appreciate any pros or cons to owning one in NJ.

No specific use, just another option at the range.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jerk alert!

If you want a reliable, well made, dependable 9mm rifle that takes Glock pattern magazines then get the Ruger PCC.  Kel-Tec has yet to to a product that has those three qualities.  

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Ray Ray said:

Jerk alert!

If you want a reliable, well made, dependable 9mm rifle that takes Glock pattern magazines then get the Ruger PCC.  Kel-Tec has yet to to a product that has those three qualities.  

Except the one @GRIZ has the site fell off. True story 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a Sub2000 gen 2 in .40 S&W. It was not a pleasant gun to shoot in that caliber.

It is considered a rifle as the gun cannot fire in the folded position. 

I do like the folding concept. I will probably get one someday, in 9mm, if I find a used one for the right price. I think new it is overpriced.

As for compliance work, the Gen 2 has a threaded barrel, so you either need to weld the provided thread protector on (which is what most FFLs do to it) or have a muzzle brake welded on. The Gen 1 rifles do not have a threaded barrel, but you want Gen 2 for the improved design and sights. I would only buy a Gen 1 if it was a screaming deal.

The adjustable stock has been cleared by the State Police firearms unit as being OK in NJ, as it is needed to take the gun down for cleaning. If you want, I can try to find my copy of the letter.

All that said.... I own the Ruger PCC 9 and agree that it is a superior rifle in just about all aspects. It is heavier and less compact than the Sub2k, but it feels like a real gun and it has really fantastic ghost ring sights. It takes Glock magazines from the 26/19/17. I have the original version, but the new aluminum handguard version really looks nice.

Let us know how you make out.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Nucrunner said:

I would appreciate any comments as far as whether the KEL-TEC Gen2 SUB2000 is good to go “as is” in NJ? YES

Is it a rifle or a Pistol? (Permit other than FID required?) RIFLE

I understand are some adjustments with the stock, will it be required to be pinned? DO NOT PIN

Giving thought to purchase, would appreciate any pros or cons to owning one in NJ. GOOD FOR BACKPACK CARRY

No specific use, just another option at the range. GO FOR IT.

Thanks!

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the .40 that takes M&P magazines... being I have two M&P40s.

Stock, they are borderline functional. Will it work... very likely yes. However, somewhere between airsoft and BB gun is a good comparison. Having a few other pistol caliber carbines, the SUB-2000 is nice for the folding feature, but it is as economic as you can make a functioning firearm.

With that being said, if you like the design... look up MCARBO. They do A LOT of modifications for the SUB-2000. I personally have all of their internal modifications in mine... and remember how I said it felt like an airsoft/BB gun? The MCARBO equipped gun feels like a gun.

I got on their pre-release sale, and got their new optics mount for about $100. Very nice design, and beats the other options... and still allows for folding. It will mount the SIG red-dot I have at home whenever I get situated up in ME.

Comparing the Ruger, I can't really talk much... as I always preferred the CX4 to the KelTec. However, the Ruger is encroaching 7 pounds (CX4 is under 6). The SUB-2000... 4.25 pounds. Plus, if you want flexibility with magazine compatibility... the KelTec does do a lot more than just Glock and Ruger.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a sub 2k gen 2 that takes Glock mags.  It has run flawlessly and is fun to shoot.

major negative: the sights. God awful, I couldn’t even use them. I removed the crappy back flip up sight, and have a romeo 5 on it.

The red dot makes it very fun to shoot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Ray Ray said:

As of now, yes.  But 1 Ruger can potentially take many more 9mm magwells.

Even if you get a Glock SUB-2000... you can order the two halves (not the actual firearm... the bolt tube is), and a universal magazine release. You now have the multi version. Halves and magazine release come out to either $57 or $82... depending on which you buy.

CZ-75, Beretta 9x, TP9, P320, M&P, P226, S&W 3rd Generation... then the Glock full-size or compact. And KelTec has been doing new magazine adapters as new guns have become popular.

Still don’t see Ruger doing anything with other magazines... even though I’d want to see it. And still want a .45 version for a suppressor host. But money will go elsewhere until that happens.

I am likely getting a 9mm Glock magazine carbine in the near future... at least when CBP fully switches over to Glock (figuring by October 2020, but likely sooner, since the northern border should be getting them first). I’d consider another KelTec... but an AR pistol also is sort of calling me. Definitely not a Ruger, completely due to weight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Screwball said:

Definitely not a Ruger, completely due to weight.

There is no way my hard earned money will go to a sub standard product.   Kel-Tec is most definitely sub standard. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Ray Ray said:

There is no way my hard earned money will go to a sub standard product.   Kel-Tec is most definitely sub standard. 

Spend your money however you want. I’d put my MCARBOed SUB-2000 up against most other pistol caliber carbines... and would feel confident with it.

Even the stock SUB-2000s have enough rounds through them to prove they are fine. You can call it what you want, but I do not see any other 16” carbines coming in that weight, much less be able to fold in half. Some of KelTec’s firearms have teething issues, but most get squared away. But the thinking outside the box is what a lot of buyers are drawn to.

That all being said, think I narrowed down on the firearm I mentioned earlier...

https://www.cmmginc.com/product/pistol-banshee-200-mkgs-9mm/

Still getting that PTR 9CT... but I like what I’ve been hearing about with the Banshee. And since 9mm Glock magazines will be abundant in the next year or so, it will be a good buy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/8/2019 at 7:31 PM, Gunnz said:

I have a sub 2k gen 2 that takes Glock mags.  It has run flawlessly and is fun to shoot.

major negative: the sights. God awful, I couldn’t even use them. I removed the crappy back flip up sight, and have a romeo 5 on it.

The red dot makes it very fun to shoot.

 

Same here.

I have a few thousand rounds through my 9mm Sub 2000 and it runs great.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On June 8, 2019 at 6:13 PM, Screwball said:

I have the .40 that takes M&P magazines... being I have two M&P40s.

Stock, they are borderline functional. Will it work... very likely yes. However, somewhere between airsoft and BB gun is a good comparison. Having a few other pistol caliber carbines, the SUB-2000 is nice for the folding feature, but it is as economic as you can make a functioning firearm.

With that being said, if you like the design... look up MCARBO. They do A LOT of modifications for the SUB-2000. I personally have all of their internal modifications in mine... and remember how I said it felt like an airsoft/BB gun? The MCARBO equipped gun feels like a gun.

I got on their pre-release sale, and got their new optics mount for about $100. Very nice design, and beats the other options... and still allows for folding. It will mount the SIG red-dot I have at home whenever I get situated up in ME.

Comparing the Ruger, I can't really talk much... as I always preferred the CX4 to the KelTec. However, the Ruger is encroaching 7 pounds (CX4 is under 6). The SUB-2000... 4.25 pounds. Plus, if you want flexibility with magazine compatibility... the KelTec does do a lot more than just Glock and Ruger.

 

Second the MCARBO mods.  I have the 9mm version that takes Glock 17 mags.  I tried the Midwest mount for my RDS.  It's a clever design that swivels out of the way to permit the gun to fold, but the retaining bolt kept loosening up, and the gun would maddeningly not hold zero.  I currently have a QD mount on there (whose name escapes me), which can be removed and replaced while holding zero.  I'm going to check the MCARBO mount that you mention.

 

On June 8, 2019 at 7:31 PM, Gunnz said:

I have a sub 2k gen 2 that takes Glock mags.  It has run flawlessly and is fun to shoot.

major negative: the sights. God awful, I couldn’t even use them. I removed the crappy back flip up sight, and have a romeo 5 on it.

The red dot makes it very fun to shoot.

I found it virtually impossible to get my head low enough to use the iron sights.  When I was able to get my cheek against the stock, I ended up with an ugly bruise.  The red dot makes a huge difference.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Old Glock guy said:

Second the MCARBO mods.  I have the 9mm version that takes Glock 17 mags.  I tried the Midwest mount for my RDS.  It's a clever design that swivels out of the way to permit the gun to fold, but the retaining bolt kept loosening up, and the gun would maddeningly not hold zero.  I currently have a QD mount on there (whose name escapes me), which can be removed and replaced while holding zero.  I'm going to check the MCARBO mount that you mention.

 

I found it virtually impossible to get my head low enough to use the iron sights.  When I was able to get my cheek against the stock, I ended up with an ugly bruise.  The red dot makes a huge difference.  

They had it for $99 for a few days surrounding D-Day... big pro-military and L/E company. It is somewhat higher, but they are still working on getting orders out. They were sure there was going to be demand, but think they slightly underestimated it. But from the people that tried out the prototypes, it far surpasses the Midwest Industries one.

They also do a slightly higher rear sight that helps with the cheek weld. Think the mount goes for cowitness, and then you can raise it if your red dot has spacers.

I looked at it via the website and YouTube... but will be heading to NJ whenever mine ships. Only gun things I had sent to FLETC was my P30 magazine/spacer for my duty gun... and ankle holster that I had modified for my 642-1 and weapon light.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/9/2019 at 10:30 PM, Screwball said:

Spend your money however you want. I’d put my MCARBOed SUB-2000 up against most other pistol caliber carbines... and would feel confident with it.

Even the stock SUB-2000s have enough rounds through them to prove they are fine. You can call it what you want, but I do not see any other 16” carbines coming in that weight, much less be able to fold in half. Some of KelTec’s firearms have teething issues, but most get squared away. But the thinking outside the box is what a lot of buyers are drawn to.

That all being said, think I narrowed down on the firearm I mentioned earlier...

https://www.cmmginc.com/product/pistol-banshee-200-mkgs-9mm/

Still getting that PTR 9CT... but I like what I’ve been hearing about with the Banshee. And since 9mm Glock magazines will be abundant in the next year or so, it will be a good buy.

Interesting. That Banshee is 24.4" inches "with the brace collapsed".  With the right type of flashider welded on and a VFG it would seem to qualify as a NJ legal non NFA firearm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • A person exercising their rights, breaking no law should not have a gun pointed at him. Care to explain how that is a strawman? The IRS is different?  How so?  A man following the law (the deputy) oh I can't be here with my gear?  okay i'll leave.  Rentacop procedes to point gun at a non threat.  And you think this is completely different?  Technically the rentacop was fired, arrested and charged.  Technically the deputy wasn't. So in your opinion anyone perceiving a threat is justified in taking lethal action against the perceived threat.   So when I see a bunch of guys in vests and black BDUs and cattying sidearms, i would be justified in pointing a gun at them?  Every Tuesday at lunch.  Funny how i am able to resist.  Man i dont even call the cops. Champion? No.  Support a person exercising their constituional protected rights absolutely. So your stance is  "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it. Unless I disagree or it might cause someone distress" My stance stops at the period.  
    • Strawman, again, really? Cant simplify it any further for you. I think you get the points made but it breaks your argument so here we go, strawman again.    You brought up the IRS guy. How about an actual response to my comments. Here they are again: But if you are referencing the guy that drew down on the local deputy at the IRS, guess what, he was actually correct that local LE does not have the authority to be armed on federal property. As I understand it that is the actual law. So now what? His judgement was poor but technically correct? Following your logic I would expect you to actually be siding with the security guard because the LAW says the deputy cannot be armed on the premises and the guard was following the law. BUT reasonable judgement would dictate no real threat existed. This is the exact flip side of wallmart. The deputy technically broke the law but was clearly not a threat. The "auditor" was within the law but one could easily articulate he looked like a threat given the totality of the circumstances and the timing of the Texas Wallmart shooting.  
    • Well isn't that great as long as you agree with the point of view all is wonderful.  If you don't agree its okay to shoot them.  
×
×
  • Create New...