Jump to content
Sniper

Still Think The Supreme Court is Going to Save You? Supreme Court won't take up gun silencer restrictions

Recommended Posts

I agree with Gorsuch. The wording that was found to be vague sounds like it was written by NJ state legislators.

Make the law say exactly what it means by including the words robbery, rape, assault and murder. Then it will pass constitutional muster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PeteF said:

Well now in the category of "Are you fucking kidding"

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gorsuch-sides-with-liberals-in-shooting-down-tougher-sentences-for-gun-crimes

Its unconstitutional to increase penalties for using a gun in a crime,  but its perfectly alright to increase penalties for NOT commiting a crime.

It’s unconstitutional to prosecute using overly vague laws. I don’t see how that’s a bad thing.. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, brucin said:

I agree with Gorsuch. The wording that was found to be vague sounds like it was written by NJ state legislators.

Make the law say exactly what it means by including the words robbery, rape, assault and murder. Then it will pass constitutional muster.

I agree with your agreement.  It sounds like he had issues with the vagueness of the proposed law.  Not with the concept of increasing penalties.

At least I hope so. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...