Jump to content
45Doll

10mm Glock

Recommended Posts

Well, I picked up a Glock 40 on Friday and shot it Sunday. I bought the 40 because of the 6" barrel, MOS ready, price point, and 15 round capacity. (When at my undisclosed PA location.)

I was shooting 'average' factory rounds, both RN and JHP, not 'full house' Underwood or equivalent.

From what I read 10mm was supposed to be what? Hard to control? Follow up shot issues? FBI agents had a problem? Take your pick. I found the Glock not only comfortable to shoot but also very accurate. (I did better than with other Glocks.) Of course the 6" barrel and sight radius helped I'm sure, but the first 15 rounds were in the X ring at 21'. I'm no he-man, and for me that's pretty accurate. It certainly wasn't a cannon.

So now I'm going to order some Underwood and see how that flies. By the specs might be a 20% or so uptick. 10mm was the first new caliber for me in eight years and just a lark. But so far I'm like'n it. I remember Ted Nugent rambling about how much he liked to shoot 10mm. Maybe I see his point.

If anyone else is into 10mm, I'm listening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, 45Doll said:

Well, I picked up a Glock 40 on Friday and shot it Sunday. I bought the 40 because of the 6" barrel, MOS ready, price point, and 15 round capacity. (When at my undisclosed PA location.)

I was shooting 'average' factory rounds, both RN and JHP, not 'full house' Underwood or equivalent.

From what I read 10mm was supposed to be what? Hard to control? Follow up shot issues? FBI agents had a problem? Take your pick. I found the Glock not only comfortable to shoot but also very accurate. (I did better than with other Glocks.) Of course the 6" barrel and sight radius helped I'm sure, but the first 15 rounds were in the X ring at 21'. I'm no he-man, and for me that's pretty accurate. It certainly wasn't a cannon.

So now I'm going to order some Underwood and see how that flies. By the specs might be a 20% or so uptick. 10mm was the first new caliber for me in eight years and just a lark. But so far I'm like'n it. I remember Ted Nugent rambling about how much he liked to shoot 10mm. Maybe I see his point.

If anyone else is into 10mm, I'm listening.

I think @fishnut loves da ten.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Biggest problem with my 10 (S&W 1026) is that it ejects the brass so far that they go out the back window opening on the 25yd range at SJSC and I have to chase them down in the grass behind the shoot house!

I'm considering a HiPoint 10mm carbine (to go with its .380, .40 and .45acp brothers) if I can find one at a great price. You can't beat the lifetime warranty (ask me how I know) and the excellent price point of the HiPoint carbines.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Zeke said:

Sooo @45Doll and @fishnut why 10 mm?

Because its 1mm better than 9mm! 

I can hunt with a 10mm pistol here in NH, More penetration than 9mm, More rounds than .357mag or .44mag.

The main reason I want a 10mm is it's a proven round for effectively stopping large attacking animals such as moose. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/19/2019 at 6:24 PM, fishnut said:

Because its 1mm better than 9mm! 

I can hunt with a 10mm pistol here in NH, More penetration than 9mm, More rounds than .357mag or .44mag.

The main reason I want a 10mm is it's a proven round for effectively stopping large attacking animals such as moose. 

What is the ballistic difference between 10mm and 357 Magnum?  Would a 6 inch 357 be better suited than a 5 inch 10mm?  Curious 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/18/2019 at 7:43 PM, 45Doll said:

Well, I picked up a Glock 40 on Friday and shot it Sunday. I bought the 40 because of the 6" barrel, MOS ready, price point, and 15 round capacity. (When at my undisclosed PA location.)

I was shooting 'average' factory rounds, both RN and JHP, not 'full house' Underwood or equivalent.

From what I read 10mm was supposed to be what? Hard to control? Follow up shot issues? FBI agents had a problem? Take your pick. I found the Glock not only comfortable to shoot but also very accurate. (I did better than with other Glocks.) Of course the 6" barrel and sight radius helped I'm sure, but the first 15 rounds were in the X ring at 21'. I'm no he-man, and for me that's pretty accurate. It certainly wasn't a cannon.

So now I'm going to order some Underwood and see how that flies. By the specs might be a 20% or so uptick. 10mm was the first new caliber for me in eight years and just a lark. But so far I'm like'n it. I remember Ted Nugent rambling about how much he liked to shoot 10mm. Maybe I see his point.

If anyone else is into 10mm, I'm listening.

I have had a Glock 20 for years.  Standard 10mm from the major manufacturers is a joke, it is loaded to 40S&W specs. I only buy Underwood and DoubleTap.  Both are much more powerful that any other 10mm that I have tried.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Ray Ray said:

What is the ballistic difference between 10mm and 357 Magnum?  Would a 6 inch 357 be better suited than a 5 inch 10mm?  Curious 

 yeah a 6"357mag should be hotter. However 10mm is a larger bullet and it's almost the same velocity with more rounds in the mag. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, fishnut said:

 yeah a 6"357mag should be hotter. However 10mm is a larger and it's almost the same velocity and more rounds in the mag. 

 

50 minutes ago, JC_68Westy said:

I have had a Glock 20 for years.  Standard 10mm from the major manufacturers is a joke, it is loaded to 40S&W specs. I only buy Underwood and DoubleTap.  Both are much more powerful that any other 10mm that I have tried.  

That 6" barrel is the reason I bought the 40, to make maximum use of whatever round I'm shooting. I'll have to look at the Remington .357 125 gr HP specs and see how they compare to the Underwood I bought.

Curiously, on the Double Tap site, the section for 'Range' ammo is empty. I didn't go through the whole product catalog, but defensive 10mm rounds were all over $1 each. The Underwood 'range' ammo is around .50.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 45Doll said:

 

That 6" barrel is the reason I bought the 40, to make maximum use of whatever round I'm shooting. I'll have to look at the Remington .357 125 gr HP specs and see how they compare to the Underwood I bought.

Curiously, on the Double Tap site, the section for 'Range' ammo is empty. I didn't go through the whole product catalog, but defensive 10mm rounds were all over $1 each. The Underwood 'range' ammo is around .50.

My 10mm is used for handgun hunting. It has a Storm Lake 6" barrel on it.  I do buy the Underwood range ammo.  It shoots great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't speak to the 10mm cartridge,  but I have found that the thicker slide that glock uses for their 10mm and .45 cal. models lowers the recoil significantly.  At least that's my opinion on the glock 30.  The recoil on the 30 was much less that I though it would be, given the size of the gun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, father-of-three said:

I can't speak to the 10mm cartridge,  but I have found that the thicker slide that glock uses for their 10mm and .45 cal. models lowers the recoil significantly.  At least that's my opinion on the glock 30.  The recoil on the 30 was much less that I though it would be, given the size of the gun.

I think it is a combination of the slide and the flex in the frame. 10mm out of a 1911 is way more intense than through a Glock.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remington .357 and Underwood 10mm:

Remington    RTP357M1    125gr   SJHP  Muzzle: 1,450 fps   583 f-lbs

Underwood   231                 135gr   JHP    Muzzle: 1,600 fps   767 f-lbs

Between these two 10mm is about 10% faster with 30% more energy. At least that's what's on paper.

"Your results may vary." :D

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, 45Doll said:

Remington .357 and Underwood 10mm:

Remington    RTP357M1    125gr   SJHP  Muzzle: 1,450 fps   583 f-lbs

Underwood   231                 135gr   JHP    Muzzle: 1,600 fps   767 f-lbs

Between these two 10mm is about 10% faster with 30% more energy. At least that's what's on paper.

"Your results may vary." :D

Not to be a jerk, but Remington ammo isn't that hot.  I used a S&W Model 13 loaded with 357 Buffalo Bore game ammo and it was hot.  Hot enough that the ejector rod had to be slammed to get the casings out.  So, that would be an apples to apples comparison. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Ray Ray said:

Not to be a jerk, but Remington ammo isn't that hot.  I used a S&W Model 13 loaded with 357 Buffalo Bore game ammo and it was hot.  Hot enough that the ejector rod had to be slammed to get the casings out.  So, that would be an apples to apples comparison. 

No jerk involvement here. I used the Remington round because historically I've seen it quoted as the most effective .357 round for self defense, by the likes of Ayoob and others.

Perhaps they don't quote hotter rounds like Buffalo Bore because they might lock up your revolver and stop you dead in your tracks in an SD scenario, as you described. That would not be good.

But if heat is your game, by all means bring it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/22/2019 at 12:25 PM, 45Doll said:

Remington .357 and Underwood 10mm:

Remington    RTP357M1    125gr   SJHP  Muzzle: 1,450 fps   583 f-lbs

Underwood   231                 135gr   JHP    Muzzle: 1,600 fps   767 f-lbs

Between these two 10mm is about 10% faster with 30% more energy. At least that's what's on paper.

"Your results may vary." :D

https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_detail&p=541

Beats the 10mm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a 10 fan boy. The original loads done by Norma were supposedly a bit rough this the comment by FBI agents.  I roll my own and it isn't expensive at all. Starline has reasonably priced brass. I have the 40 with the Trijicon optic on it and enjoy it. I have 6 pistols in 10mm. 610, sig 220 legion, tangfolio, delta elite, 2 glocks (20,40)  I also have a 20 in 9x25 Dillon which is a 10 necked down to 9mm much like 357 sig is 40 necked down to 9 (kind of).  Probably gonna a score another 1911 style 10mm when I head to Jax tomorrow. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I shot the Underwood rounds at the range Wednesday. Yes, it's a bigger bang. In fact one guy out of the three at the other end of the lanes came over to see what all the noise was and reported back to his friends 'he's shooting 10mm'.

The Underwood Range Supply 297 is a definite step up from the Magtech rounds I shot previously. They felt 'comfortable' out of the Glock 40, and my wife shot them too. I could shoot them for a while.

The 246 ammo felt slightly hotter but OK to shoot. The 231 was definitely a step-up! I wouldn't want to shoot them all day at 1600 fps. Here's where I suspect the ergonomics of a particular pistol might come into play.

But we did get a kick out of the boom and muzzle flash! 

@Rob0115: in your opinion what's the most 'ergonomic' of the 10mm's you shoot?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a steel frame EAA Witness in .45acp that takes conversion slides.

I picked up a .22lr slide when my daughter got interested in shooting, and a 9mm slide when she wanted to shoot centerfire matches.

All this 10mm talk makes me think I should get a 10mm slide for me:

eaa-witness-steel-10mm-b.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/20/2019 at 8:55 PM, 45Doll said:

So I shot the Underwood rounds at the range Wednesday. Yes, it's a bigger bang. In fact one guy out of the three at the other end of the lanes came over to see what all the noise was and reported back to his friends 'he's shooting 10mm'.

The Underwood Range Supply 297 is a definite step up from the Magtech rounds I shot previously. They felt 'comfortable' out of the Glock 40, and my wife shot them too. I could shoot them for a while.

The 246 ammo felt slightly hotter but OK to shoot. The 231 was definitely a step-up! I wouldn't want to shoot them all day at 1600 fps. Here's where I suspect the ergonomics of a particular pistol might come into play.

But we did get a kick out of the boom and muzzle flash! 

@Rob0115: in your opinion what's the most 'ergonomic' of the 10mm's you shoot?

Discounting the wheel gun I’d say the 220 legion.  It’s jut silky smooth, heavy enough to handle the hotter stuff and great trigger.  After that I’d say the EAA Match Witness. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • Sorry, both are SPF.  Being picked up this week. Win M22  22 LR SPF to Ringwoodfrank.
    • Yup I see. Looks like right now you can only purchase the 2023-2024 permit still. I assume won't be able to purchase 24-25 season permit until July.
    • Just a heads-up for anyone who might also be in this situation. I joined USLS mid-April of 2022. Some time after renewing for 2023, I changed email providers, and dutifully reflected my new address on my account page. So, I have been anticipating renewal alerts at my new address, but those never arrived. I logged in to my account the other day, and was surprised to see that my subscription expired that same day. I went to my account main information page, confimed that my email address was correct, then went to the billing page, which showed my previous two payments, but which did not give me any apparent way to pay up for the new year. I requested support using the Customer Service form on the web site, but received no reply. Today I called their support number. Apparently changing the email address from my view of my account page did nothing to change the address that they use internally for billing purposes, including expiration notifications. Maybe they also use that address for replies to the support form, even if a different email address is entered there. Also, my account was set up to auto-renew and charge my credit card without my intervention, but that setting did not show on my account page in any obvious way. So, if you have USLS and have changed your email address since you last renewed, you might want to give them a call to ensure that they send renewal information to your correct address. The prospect of having legal coverage lapse while carrying in NJ was, for me, a less that confidence inspiring experience. I will note that the telephone-based customer service was excellent.
    • F*n imbeciles. They know damned well (or should) that, even if passed by the Colorado Senate and signed into law, virtually that entire load of crap is certain to fail Bruen/Heller scrutiny, and probably sooner, rather than later (SCOTUS). What a monumental waste of time (of course, how much can a dip$h*t's time be worth, anyway?) and energy. I passed through Colorado a few times in the 70s, and visited some clients there in the 80's & 90's, and, even by the end of that period, I had the impression that it was politically fairly conservative (with a few exceptions such as Aspen). WTF happened?
×
×
  • Create New...