Jump to content
kc17

Good call from Appeals Court

Recommended Posts

I did a search for the Defendants name assuming the case had been discussed here, but nothing came up.

"In her appeal, Vertetis argued that Superior Court Judge Stephen Taylor was mistaken when telling jurors that she had a duty to retreat if she was in danger and that this could derail her self-defense claim.

In fact, her attorney argued that she had no obligation to retreat under the “castle” doctrine, which says that deadly force is justified when defending yourself in your own home.

The appellate court agreed with that point.

“The (jury) charge not only omitted the ‘castle’ exception but expressly told the jurors — in no uncertain terms — that self-defense is not available to defendant if she could have safely retreated or was the initial aggressor. That mistake easily could have permeated the jury’s consideration of self-defense, not only with respect to the murder count but also the lesser-included homicide offenses," the appeals court wrote in its decision released Wednesday.

The appeals court vacated the murder conviction and ordered a new trial."

https://www.nj.com/morris/2020/03/teacher-sentenced-to-30-years-for-killing-boyfriend-a-retired-cop-wins-new-trial.html

  • Informative 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That kind of clears up something that I've wondered about. I know NJ law says duty to retreat and have read that NJ is a castle doctrine state and it always sounded like a contradiction. So is this the first time this has come up? And is it now precedent  castle doctrine supersedes duty to retreat in your home? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way I am reading it, that was the issue. In the Judge's instructions to the Jury he said she had a duty to retreat, which is not correct.

2C:3-4 Use of force in self-protection. (i)The actor is not obliged to retreat from his dwelling, unless he was the initial aggressor; and

https://law.justia.com/codes/new-jersey/2013/title-2c/section-2c-3-4/

I believe there needs to be consequences against the Judge in the original case.

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, kc17 said:

The way I am reading it, that was the issue. In the Judge's instructions to the Jury he said she had a duty to retreat, which is not correct.

2C:3-4 Use of force in self-protection. (i)The actor is not obliged to retreat from his dwelling, unless he was the initial aggressor; and

https://law.justia.com/codes/new-jersey/2013/title-2c/section-2c-3-4/

I believe there needs to be consequences against the Judge in the original case.

Agree.

Judge needs censure of some kind.

Glad the appellate judge got it right.

I'll retreat to my home.  Beyond that there is no retreat...

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, kc17 said:

The way I am reading it, that was the issue. In the Judge's instructions to the Jury he said she had a duty to retreat, which is not correct.

2C:3-4 Use of force in self-protection. (i)The actor is not obliged to retreat from his dwelling, unless he was the initial aggressor; and

https://law.justia.com/codes/new-jersey/2013/title-2c/section-2c-3-4/

I believe there needs to be consequences against the Judge in the original case.

He should be fined and suspended from the bench for such a gross disregard of the law.. 

 

Everything he said is clearly contradicted by written law. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not easy to remove or even censure a judge in NJ.  Click on link and scroll down to NJ,

http://www.judicialselection.com/judicial_selection/methods/removal_of_judges.cfm?state

Judges are among those who have a certain type of immunity.  You can't sue a judge for an incorrect ruling or omission.  If you could who would want to take a job as a judge?

She can get twice the amount she was earning the year before her conviction for each year she was in prison or $50,000 a year, whichever is greater.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DirtyDigz said:

Judge Stephen Taylor is up for re-appointment this year:

https://ballotpedia.org/Stephen_J._Taylor

Who appoints superior court judges?  The governor?

 

1 hour ago, WP22 said:

The governor.

 

27 minutes ago, njJoniGuy said:

And confirmed by the State Senate

 

1 hour ago, WP22 said:

The governor.

 

 

15 minutes ago, njJoniGuy said:

And confirmed by the State Senate

 

Which is like a Rubber Stamp!

image.png.2f38e3b25346f55fd4e992c060891b5a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, GRIZ said:

 

Judges are among those who have a certain type of immunity.  You can't sue a judge for an incorrect ruling or omission.  If you could who would want to take a job as a judge?

 

He should at the very least have to explain his rational to their ethics board. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When questioned by the D-led Senate Judiciary Committee, he'll say "I thought that's the way you guys wanted the law interpreted? Am I right??"

They'll pin a medal on him, confirm his appointment for another term, and send him happily on his way to continue to abuse the Second Amendment of the US Constitution, which none of them believe in anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, JackDaWack said:

He should at the very least have to explain his rational to their ethics board. 

Only if the governor or majority of the legislature ask for it and the review  board asks for a hearing.  Don't think that's going to happen.

I agree this was not a simple error or omission.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • This mindset baffles me. Shooting is a depreciating skill. If you don't practice, you will become worse at it. If you value your life enough to want to defend it, why would you rely on a skill that you don't practice? If the best I can do on a good day is scrape a pass on CCARE, I would be determined to get better at shooting - and yes I did see that you scored 98% - but your attitude appears to be that you shouldn't have to practice first. Trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, perhaps you mean that the government should not mandate that you have to meet any kind of standard before you can carry. I agree. There should not be any mandated quals. However, only a fool would be carrying a gun he can't use effectively. It does little to protect himself and creates a danger to everyone else because the misses will go on to hit something or someone after they miss the intended target.
    • OK let me explain. If you use your 9MM to qualify you will probably need to practice before you qualify so you go through 125 rds of ammo. Using expensive 9mm ammunition that's probably close to $0.40 around is costly. If you used your .22 LR pistol the price drops to less than 10 cents a round. I easily qualified with my Glock 226  ( 1 miss out of 50) but burned up  a lot of ammo practicing. We should not be required to qualify to exercise a constitutional right and it should not cost a few hundred dollars to do so.
    • Up for sale a Nikon Monarch 1.5-4.5X20 Riflescope. Scope formerly sat on top of my old Mini 14, so it is used. It also has some aftermarket lens covers on them (Buffalo Creek I believe). I'm asking $100 for the scope. Willing to drive within an hour of Woodbridge or meet half way. Buyer pays any shipping costs. First to post "I'll take it" wins the scope.
    • In 50 years of living in NJ I've never experienced any attempt to inspect the interior of the home, and only one definite inspection of the exterior for an announced reassessment of all properties and that was a drive by. About 9 years of that was living in an apartment, but still, uncommon. Every place I lived had either a finished attic, basement, or both. But they were also included in the habitable square footage on the taxes when we got there. 
×
×
  • Create New...