Ray Ray 3,566 Posted May 4, 2020 This is absolutely ridiculous. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gleninjersey 2,134 Posted May 4, 2020 Hopefully next week. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
revenger 472 Posted May 4, 2020 what did they punt, can't view that on the work computer. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WP22 1,558 Posted May 4, 2020 https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/breaking-supreme-court-relists-all-10-second-amendment-cases-considered-in-fridays-conference/ Supreme court just relisted all 10 2A cases under consideration. The theory was that they punted on the NY case last week to hear one of the 10 cases before the court. They may still do it but I still maintain the only way we'll get a favorable 2A decision is if a rep president appoints all 9 justices. We may get a 5-4 decision then. 1 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Greenday 323 Posted May 4, 2020 Does it really take 20 minutes to say they chose not to hear the arguments at this time but maybe in the future? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WP22 1,558 Posted May 4, 2020 27 minutes ago, Greenday said: Does it really take 20 minutes to say they chose not to hear the arguments at this time but maybe in the future? But them how do you expect to find out about the guy's back? And that's as far as I made it. This ain't a Dear Abby and I ain't got time for that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Ray 3,566 Posted May 4, 2020 1 hour ago, Greenday said: Does it really take 20 minutes to say they chose not to hear the arguments at this time but maybe in the future? I agree, the first few minutes of drama are unnecessary but the meat of the video is good. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJM981 924 Posted May 15, 2020 Any word? Conference was suppposed to be yesterday as per their schedule. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
njJoniGuy 2,129 Posted May 15, 2020 We should know on Monday. 1 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
voyager9 3,417 Posted May 15, 2020 Am I the only one that holds my breath when I see updates to this thread? 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
njJoniGuy 2,129 Posted May 15, 2020 2 minutes ago, voyager9 said: Am I the only one that holds my breath when I see updates to this thread? Well don't hold it for too long, or we'll have to put you on a ventilator. And you know how THAT ends. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
revenger 472 Posted May 18, 2020 what site to watch for update , anyone have a link Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WP22 1,558 Posted May 18, 2020 1 hour ago, revenger said: what site to watch for update , anyone have a link https://www.scotusblog.com https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/petitions-were-watching/ 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WP22 1,558 Posted May 18, 2020 No action on any of the ten 2A cases. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051820zor_5he6.pdf https://bearingarms.com/cam-e/2020/05/18/scotus-2a-holding-pattern/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marlintag 223 Posted May 18, 2020 I have donated to Mark Cheeseman's case and have followed the other cases as well. Sadly, I feel the only option for those seeking relief would be to move to one of the other 43 "Shall Issue" states. I have very little hope that the supreme court will take, review, and rule on a case that impacts "may issue/no issue" states. Relief may have to come from within or may it never come at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1LtCAP 4,259 Posted May 18, 2020 1 hour ago, WP22 said: No action on any of the ten 2A cases. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051820zor_5he6.pdf https://bearingarms.com/cam-e/2020/05/18/scotus-2a-holding-pattern/ i am shocked. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
45Doll 5,848 Posted May 18, 2020 The football whisked away again by our Chief Justice Lucy Van Pelt. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Ray 3,566 Posted May 18, 2020 Punts, like a bitch 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WP22 1,558 Posted May 18, 2020 10 minutes ago, 1LtCAP said: i am shocked. I don't know if you are serious or not. But, I'm not shocked. I was expecting it. When they let NYC bend them over like bitches, nothing they do surprises me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JackDaWack 2,894 Posted May 18, 2020 19 minutes ago, WP22 said: I don't know if you are serious or not. But, I'm not shocked. I was expecting it. When they let NYC bend them over like bitches, nothing they do surprises me. Yup, I expect nothing significant until Robert's is overruled with another conservative being placed on the courts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1LtCAP 4,259 Posted May 18, 2020 49 minutes ago, WP22 said: I don't know if you are serious or not. But, I'm not shocked. I was expecting it. When they let NYC bend them over like bitches, nothing they do surprises me. i am not. that was 1,000% sarcasm. i pretty much had a gut feeling they were gonna do this. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
b47356 21 Posted May 18, 2020 At least all but 1 still are alive. I don't know why Beers was mooted. Of interest is that they rejected Kelsay v. Ernst and Jessop v. City of Fresno, both qualified immunity cases. Kelsay reads as contempt of cop, with a predictable outcome for Kelsay - and the cop is, naturally, immune from lawsuit. In Jessop, police on a search warrant stole a rare coin collection. Not only is it acceptable that they did so, but they are immune from a lawsuit. It comes down to being able to point to a historical case in your circuit where the court held the public official was not protected. So in Jessop, the police were immune because there is no case that says police who steal are not immune. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WP22 1,558 Posted May 18, 2020 31 minutes ago, b47356 said: Of interest is that they rejected Kelsay v. Ernst and Jessop v. City of Fresno, both qualified immunity cases. There are a few cases before the court that deals with qualified immunity. Hopefully (there I go again) the court drives a stake thru the heart of that abomination that has no legal basis to exist. Qualified immunity is a fabrication of the judiciary and only exists because the branch that created it say so. But, hope springs eternal, they say. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drjjpdc 39 Posted May 18, 2020 Well at least they were not on the refused certiorari list. I am sure Alito is not happy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marlintag 223 Posted May 22, 2020 Scotus punts yet again.......new date for conference is 5/28/20. I can't really say I'm surprised, NJ will be last(if ever) to get "shall issue" conceal carry. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Ray 3,566 Posted May 22, 2020 52 minutes ago, marlintag said: Scotus punts yet again.......new date for conference is 5/28/20. I can't really say I'm surprised, NJ will be last(if ever) to get "shall issue" conceal carry. Link? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marlintag 223 Posted May 22, 2020 https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/18-824.html (Rogers) https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/19-27.html (Cheeseman) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites