JCastag 4 Posted May 14, 2020 Does anyone know for sure if this is NJ legal/complaint? https://grabagun.com/firearms/handguns/semi-automatic-handguns/ruger-pc-charger-state-compliant-9mm-6-5-barrel-10-rounds.html I am guessing no, but wanted to check. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krdshrk 3,872 Posted May 14, 2020 Nope. It's got 4 strikes against it since it's a Pistol. (1) An ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip; (2) A threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer; (3) A shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand without being burned; (4) Manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded Even if you got rid of the threaded barrel and shroud, the weight is still way over. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JCastag 4 Posted May 14, 2020 cant wait to move out of this state!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CMJeepster 2,766 Posted May 14, 2020 1 hour ago, Krdshrk said: Nope. It's got 4 strikes against it since it's a Pistol. (1) An ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip; (2) A threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer; (3) A shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand without being burned; (4) Manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded Even if you got rid of the threaded barrel and shroud, the weight is still way over. None of these restrictions makes any sense to me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
njJoniGuy 2,129 Posted May 14, 2020 1 hour ago, CMJeepster said: None of these restrictions makes any sense to me. None of the provisions of NJ's AWB (spread between 2C:39 and 2C:58) make any sense. They don't stop criminals (or potential criminals) from doing ANYTHING. They only affect the law-abiding. It's so much easier to control the behavior of the law-abiding than the criminals. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CMJeepster 2,766 Posted May 14, 2020 12 minutes ago, njJoniGuy said: None of the provisions of NJ's AWB (spread between 2C:39 and 2C:58) make any sense. They don't stop criminals (or potential criminals) from doing ANYTHING. They only affect the law-abiding. It's so much easier to control the behavior of the law-abiding than the criminals. I agree with all of what you are saying. My statement goes back to the idea that if any or all of those things were legal, it wouldn't cause an uptick in crimes where a firearm is used. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maintenanceguy 509 Posted May 14, 2020 None of it makes sense because...The state passed a law that banned 60 firearms by name and then said that any firearm that was "substantially identical" was also banned. Somebody went to court and argued that "substantially identical" can't be defined. Who knows if a firearm is "substantially identical" to another firearm. The court agreed and let the AG write a better definition of "substantially identical". This is what the AG came up with and the Judge allowed it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites