CA standard capacity magazine restriction

[Rob0115 1,105]

From what I just read on ARFCOM was the 9th circuit court has overturned that ban.  Which organizations around here have the capability of moving a lawsuit forward in NJ now that there is some precedent.  I am willing to donate to liberate my brothers and sisters here in NJ.  

How can this CA get this right and has NJ even tried?

Here's a link.

https://apnews.com/11a1e49886a3143f2db3fbf5b10c5069?utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_medium=AP

I should clearly state the obvious IANAL and I did not stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.  In fact I drank way too much, didn't sleep well and have a hangover.  And if you were wondering, yes I'm doing it again tonight because it's Friday and I'm in a good mood.  

 

[Zeus2112 2]

I'd like to think that this could be possible here, but nothing in this state works the way it should and does elsewhere. But i'm hoping!

[voyager9 3,434]

Already being discussed here

 

[Rob0115 1,105]

6 hours ago, voyager9 said:

Already being discussed here

 

Thanks. 

[fslater 62]

Lets say the NJ appellate sides with the state.

If two federal appellate courts render conflicting decisions, isn't SCOUTS constitutionally required to intervene?

[YankeeSC 1,204]

Thank you for correctly referring to them as "standard capacity"!

[brucin 923]

On 8/17/2020 at 4:57 PM, fslater said:

Lets say the NJ appellate sides with the state.

If two federal appellate courts render conflicting decisions, isn't SCOUTS constitutionally required to intervene?

Not if they're unsure how Roberts will rule.

[raz-0 1,259]

On 8/17/2020 at 4:57 PM, fslater said:

Lets say the NJ appellate sides with the state.

If two federal appellate courts render conflicting decisions, isn't SCOUTS constitutionally required to intervene?

Hasn't made them yet. But yeah they are supposed to resolve that crap.