Leaderboard

Nj is fd up. Tell him to go f himself. Were not servants of the king. Thats screwed up

This at the least makes me feel Gorsuch was an excellent choice. Thank you President Trump!. We need 2 more!

From another forum: Doctor: "Do you have guns in your home?" Patient: "Does your spouse enjoy anal sex?" Doctor: "I can't see how that is any of your business!" Patient: "Exactly!" Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

One can only hope that Roberts and Alito withheld their votes because of a perceived vote against public carry by Kennedy which would be the death knell for CCW.

M16A1 clone. 100% NJ compliant. Genuine USGI parts used wherever possible.

This is my answer to everything now. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Glock, and any gun = dangerous. Because as HE said, there is inherent danger in its capabilities. Just like motorcycles, skydiving, etc. Serpa = unsafe. Qualities that enhance the dangerous capabilities of holster and the drawstroke. Characteristics that do not exist with other holsters. The real question is, why in the world does anyone even consider these holsters anymore? We can continue to have the debate of how safe the holster is to use (even though it's not), but nothing changes the fact that it's still a POS!

So true..if the dept doesn't pay for it or supply it then they will get whatever they can to skate by the cheapest. Oh and don't expect police dept issued equpt to be better. Usually bought by house mousers with no experience and used by cops who don't take care of it because its not theirs

Ah, ok. I have an A2 type Comp on the A1 I just built on a Nodak Retro A1 lower and upper receiver set. I looked everywhere for a comp that had the slots all around like the A1 type but couldn't find one and settled on the A2.

Hopefully by year end. Ant

It's not exactly local to you, but at least it's a straight shot across 195. Howell Gun Works has a respectable inventory of AR parts. HGW is about 30 minutes from me and it's always worth the trip.

If you want it cold without watering down your bourbon, there are solutions available.... https://whiskystones.com/

There is no point in trying to explain logic to a contrarian.....

I'm very disappointed that, at least, Alito did not join the dissent with Thomas and Gorsuch. I've learned not to expect ANYTHING from the Chief except treachery. And for the rest of them, may they rot in Hell, very soon I hope. Show them the way Ruthie!

Id light mine up when the neighbors put out their clothes line.

Ray, all guns are dangerous. They'd be useless if they weren't. It's dangerous to drive 65 mph. It's unsafe to do it with bald tires and no brakes. Parachuting is dangerous. It's unsafe to do it with your chute packed in a garbage bag. See acaixguard's post.

Try not to vomit when you read this. The FBI admits that Hodgkinson: • raged against Republicans in online forums *note to some of our more aggressive posters: these things do come up during investigations* • had a piece of paper bearing the names of six members of Congress • was reported for doing target practice outside his home in recent months before moving to Alexandria, • had mapped out a trip to the DC area, • took multiple photos of the baseball field he would later shoot up, three days after the New York Times mentioned that Republicans practiced baseball at an Alexandria baseball field with little security, • lived out of his van at the YMCA directly next door to the baseball field he shot up, • legally purchased a rifle in March 2003 and 9 mm handgun “in November 2016,” • modified the rifle at some point to accept a detachable magazine and replaced the original stock with a stock • rented a storage facility to hide hundreds of rounds of ammunition and additional rifle components, • asked “Is this the Republican or Democrat baseball team?” before firing on the Republicans, • ran a Google search for information on the “2017 Republican Convention” hours before the shooting, • and took photos at high-profile Washington locations, including the east front plaza of the U.S. Capitol and the Dirksen Senate Office. • We know from other reporting that the list was of six Republican Freedom Caucus members, including Rep. Mo Brooks, who was present at the practice. So what does the FBI decide this information means? Well, the takeaway of the briefing was characterized well by the Associated Press headline about it: “FBI: Gunman who shot congressman had no target in mind.” The Associated Press reported the FBI: • believes the gunman “had no concrete plan to inflict violence” against Republicans, • “had not yet clarified who, if anyone, he planned to target, or why,” • believes he may have just “happened upon” the baseball game the morning of June 14, and that the attack appeared “spontaneous,” • are unclear on the “context” of Hodgkinson’s note with six names of members of Congress, • does not believe that photographs of the baseball field or other sites “represented surveillance of intended targets,” and • “painted a picture of a down-on-his-luck man with few future prospects.” In fact, USA Today went with “FBI offers portrait of troubled Alexandria shooter with ‘anger management problem’” for their headline, since that’s what the FBI emphasized in the briefing. Unreal.....

Looks like it will take three more Trump appointees for the Supremes to recognize that the 2nd Amendment exists. Big disappointment. From the way it's stalling doesn't look like the Hudson bill will even get through the House, much less be approved by the Senate or withstand legal challenges. Back to Plan A: move.

I've never had a doctor (or anyone for that matter) ask if I had guns, so I find it kinda strange that this is even a thing out there. My kids pediatrician is cool as hell. She seems like the type that would tell me go buy guns to keep my family safe and not be a pussy

WAIT TILL YOU SEE WHAT I HAVE PLANNED.........

Here's your third agreement on the subject. Now go buy it and enjoy it.

This is the case to follow now, it is a pure open carry issue, unlike Perruta. It is pending oral argument in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Charles Nichols v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al Nichols v. Brown Appeal No.: 14-55873

Amazon Prime items ship 2nd day or next day for free...

But they will hear a case about a baker and wedding cakes..... didn't know cake baking was a constitutional amendment

I support SCOTUS decision to deny review of Peruta. The court was busy reviewing / rule on important & significant cases such as * Weaver vs. MA where a conviction is challenged because the court space was too small to accommodate large number of public * Matal vs Tam where a patent dispute is escalated into a "First Amendment Issue". How can anyone fault SCOTUS for not taking up 2A case when all these other complex, very important, ground breaking, history changing cases are waiting in line. <end-of-sarcasm>

A part of the dissent by Thomas and joined by Gorsuch: The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE THOMAS, with whom JUSTICE GORSUCH joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. The Second Amendment to the Constitution guarantees that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arm's shall not be infringed.” At issue in this case is whether that guarantee protects the right to carry firearms in public for self-defense. Neither party disputes that the issue is one of national importance or that the courts of appeals have already weighed in extensively. I would therefore grant the petition for a writ of certiorari. Even if other Members of the Court do not agree that the Second Amendment likely protects a right to public carry, the time has come for the Court to answer this important question definitively. Twenty-six States have asked us to resolve the question presented, see Brief for Alabama et al. as Amici Curiae, and the lower courts have fully vetted the issue. At least four other Courts of Appeals and three state courts of last resort have decided cases regarding the ability of States to regulate the public carry of firearms. Those decisions (plus the one below) have produced thorough opinions on both sides of the issue. Hence, I do not see much value in waiting for additional courts to weigh in, especially when constitutional rights are at stake The Court has not heard argument in a Second Amendment case in over seven years—since March 2, 2010, in McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U. S. 742. Since that time, we have heard argument in, for example, roughly 35 cases where the question presented turned on the meaning of the First Amendment and 25 cases that turned on the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. This discrepancy is inexcusable, especially given how much less developed our jurisprudence is with respect to the Second Amendment as compared to the First and Fourth Amendments. The Constitution does not rank certain rights above others, and I do not think this Court should impose such a hierarchy by selectively enforcing its preferred rights. The Court’s decision to deny certiorari in this case reflects a distressing trend: the treatment of the Second Amendment as a disfavored right For those of us who work in marbled halls, guarded constantly by a vigilant and dedicated police force, the guarantees of the Second Amendment might seem antiquated and superfluous. But the Framers made a clear choice: They reserved to all Americans the right to bear arms for self-defense. I do not think we should stand by idly while a State denies its citizens that right, particularly when their very lives may depend on it. I respectfully dissent.

Doug MacRay: I need your help. I can't tell you what it is, you can never ask me about it later, and we're gonna hurt some people. James Coughlin: ...Whose car are we gonna' take? The Town (2010)

I have a 1911 built on a Caspian frame and slide, and the rest of the pistol is a mix of different manufacturers. Caspian will fit the Slide to the frame, but that is as far as they go (they do not build pistols). Caspian is a great company and is very easy to deal with. I sent the frame / slide and rest of the parts to Defensive Creations and he built the pistol for me. Dave does great work, he was honest and accurate with the time frame for when to send the parts to him, to when the pistol was completed. With that being said, you could dump a whole lot of money buying the best parts to build a 1911, but it all comes down to the smith who fits the parts and finishes the gun. You're either gonna have a pistol that runs like a top, or a $2000 paperweight.

Just say no. I'm amazed. You don't have to be a Jedi to get past this question. Why do we need a law prohibiting anyone from asking an intrusive question? Are we that f'ing stockholmed?

imagine if Tex had a Serpa and a Glock.. Oh My..

Oddly, on point

Like it.

Sweet ill pm you when were ready. Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Follow Jersey Rules if driving from anywhere in NJ to a Jersey Range. Follow FOPA Rules if transporting long guns and/or hand guns out-of-state to visit a Sporting Clays event or any other scheduled match with long guns OR hand guns . Furthermore, a NJFPID card is NOT required to transport hand guns OR long guns into NJ to go to a range to shoot. One look at a parking lot will tell you that NJ, NY, PA, VA, CT, DE, etc. shooters are currently shooting a hand gun match at my club as I type this . The Cops aren't poised to lock them all up, lol. No one cares about your usage of long gun cases until you get T-Boned and the guns fly outta the vehicle while the Jeep is rolling-over....

Mesa side saddle ok, Sherpa bad

As I get older, it gets increasingly hard to surprise me. But this actually shocks me. Am I so naïve that I expect better from the FBI than we might get, for instance, from HuffPo? These agents are supposed to be dedicated to protecting this country. They're also supposed to be at least reasonably intelligent - it's an elite law enforcement agency for god's sakes! So, how did they add up all of those facts and NOT see a highly intentional act? The fact that the guy had anger mgmt issues (which is probably true) doesn't negate the purposeful nature of all the steps he took prior to the attack. Honestly, I'm just totally flummoxed by this. I can see why some people get all tinfoil hattish - because stuff like this makes no damn sense. My conclusion is: either the FBI is loaded to the rafters with drooling idiots (like Zeke, I find that hard to believe), or... the FBI's leadership is as corrupt, politicized and manipulative as the day is long and they're spinning this story bigtime. Either is a big concern!

Mr Nappen isn't always right. But since NJSP can't make up their mind this will continue to be a mystery.

Nappen is wrong again. THE ARTICLE SAYS: "The 590® Shockwave is a “Destructive device” under NJ Gun Law because it is capable of firing a projectile greater than .60 Caliber (12 Gauge = .729 Caliber) and it is NOT a shotgun." The statute actually reads greater than 60 caliber, not .60 caliber. "any weapon capable of firing a projectile of a caliber greater than 60 caliber, except a shotgun or shotgun ammunition generally recognized as suitable for sporting purposes". He forgot the "or" part as bolded above.

United States Marshall Service answers directly to the U. S. Supreme Court if enforcement is needed and President Retains Power to Federalize the Guard where needed