I personally don't think the storage cost being sponsored here makes sense. In 3 years of storage cost you can pay for almost any new mag, except a few 2011 models. I don't think we will be hearing from the Supreme court by then (if ever) on this suite in particular. I suppose if one is going to be moving soon it might make sense at 1.25/mag/month.
I am happy what ANJRPC has tried to do on this suite overall, the suite was well written and thought out and reference rich. I put all the blame of failure so far on the Federal District judge, his reasoning was weak, and his bias obvious. If he wasn't biased in favor of the state we would have won at least with one of the main 3 complaints. For example, grandfathering, compensation, parity with ret-cops for those who have 15r already in possession.
That said, i am left wondering how ANJRPC is managing this injunction/stay appeal. It was immediately denied "without prejudice" and with no explanation. ANJRPC says this may mean the A-court will rule before dec-10 on the main case (rather than the injunction). Is there any reason our lawyers can't ask the A-Court their intentions, that is if they are done with their standing denial, or if they do in fact intend to rule on the main case before dec 10? This would be helpful to all involved, so we, and our Lawyers can take the next step now. Or perhaps in our modern day Land-of-OZ, it would be considered too forward for the peon-subjects to question the "man behind the curtain" with this small question of clarification - LOL!