Leaderboard

Oh he’ll sign it.. He won’t upset the police unions...

I grew up with one of the head writers for SNL, I regularly text her and tell her how shitty her show is.

Because we're better marksman than the police, we practice and train more. I guess leo's are more like stormtroopers... they can't hit shit and need the extra rounds. lol

I wouldn't say that makes you special, plenty of people who aren't cops lay their lives down for others....and dont get paid for it.. I appreciate that cops do this, but they are FAR from being the only ones.

We definitely need an organization called "A Million Mags Against Gun Control" or "Everytown for Standard Mags"

As you all can imagine, the past three years of getting this store up and running has been a journey for the ages. I appreciate all of you that took the time to come visit the shop and I know that as we progress through the next year, inventory and atmosphere will be doing nothing but grow. I must also admit that it is my own fault for not getting the word out on the forum and to that I apologize to all myfellow forum folks. As Randolph before, my door is always open to any of you that may have any needs, suggestions and or concerns. The staff here in Union is a bit new so we are working through the small stuff to really make this a great shooting experience for all of our dedicated customers. I am most easily contacted at my email: [email protected] and more than welcome contact from any and all of you. I do not easily forget the suggestions that were provided by many of you in the Randolph location and the growing pains were ALL of ours. This Union location will have similar growing pains and as before, I prefer to hear from you first and try and address it than getting off to a bad start with published complaints before a solution has been examined. If I don't do anything or fail to act, WELL, BASH AWAY!! HA HA Thank you again for backing us over the past seven years and I look forward to seeing you at the range.

https://www-washingtonpost-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/nation/2018/12/18/right-bear-nunchucks-federal-judge-strikes-down-ban-weapon-violation-second-amendment/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From %1%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fnation%2F2018%2F12%2F18%2Fright-bear-nunchucks-federal-judge-strikes-down-ban-weapon-violation-second-amendment%2F As a proud former ninja, I have learned the ways of Nunchucks. My favorite cartoon as a kid was TMNT and my love of ninja hardware started then. Glad to see that soon I can CCW nunchucks in Staten Island soon.

Do you thesaurisize before you post?

In all seriousness. The implication of this ruling should hopefully ripple

Having spent numerous hours perfecting the craft, I can assure you, knocking yourself out is not really the issue. Self-sterilization is a much higher probability.

This so easily disproven when you look at percentage of hits to shots fired, LEO's vs. civilians that I wonder if ANJRPC used this tactic in their challenge.

My old department allowed us one off duty firearm to qualify with. We are not allowed a back up. I would have been getting rid of any other magazine. I am an RPO and the NJSP allow me as many as I want to qualify. As for gun laws, most of us are against them. I am an NRA life, a lot are. There are those that want civilians to not own firearms. Yes, there are liberal cops, there are administrators that mouth the rhetoric of liberal socialist politicians. We need to stop falling into the divide of them and us. That is what they want. Are LEOs special? Well if being willing to lay down your life for someone you do not know, makes you special? Even retired, we can't get it out of our head.

Reading this thread feels like I've taken a wrong turn down a really weird street. But as for the subject started by the OP, Kerik was on Tucker last night, and he defended the right of lawful gun owners to own magazines holding more than ten rounds.

What about all those years before Nappen was giving his advice? I'm talking back to 1990 not just the past few months. A cop needs reason to stop you first of all. Leaving a range is not probable cause to search your car for >10 Rd magazines. Or anything else for that matter. How many cops do you think NJSP, Prosecutors Office, and local departments do you think they have to assign to "magazine enforcement"? I'm sure Drunk Driving Checkpoints and other operational considerations have a much higher priority. Zero chance? There is never a zero chance for anything. The world is not absolutes. Close to zero chance of getting stopped leaving a range with >10 Rd magazines unless you do something very stupid. Give it time. We'll see who's correct.

stupid idea and one that has been tried by the US, Russia and the UK in the past. An entirely new weapons platform will need to be developed and a new trigger. The Russians were the only ones to successfully field a rifle like this with one putting 3 bullets off of one trigger pull into the same hole but NOT SURPRISINGLY, it wasn't reliable. Army needs to spend this money on further training and stop trying to reinvent the wheel. The m4 series of rifles are more than adequate, reliable, accurate, cheap, and ergonomic

If this is true that the majority of people did not comply, they may as well just go for broke at this point and get a bunch of 30+ rounders in PA/DE. Same penalty as 15 rounds if I am not mistaken. On a related note, most NJ gun owners are too busy with everything but firearms. Most probably don't even have a clue that they're breaking the law.

Everything would be stopping me from the guns I wanted, if I were still in NJ. Machine guns, SBS, SBR, Suppressors, AR Pistols, and all. Oh, not to mention accessories like collapsible stocks, bayonet lugs, flash hinders, normal capacity mags, and all. But the NJ simple and easy process is okay for your duck gun and revolver. Go back to the 1A forum where people tolerate you Fuckhead.

If they made you turn them in the 5A would require the state to compensate you. If they did that, the state would have millions of "dangerous" over 10 Rd magazines they couldn't resell as that would be counter to their argument that they are "dangerous". NJ can use that money for more important purposes as paying lawyers to represent illegal aliens. NJ just says you can't own them in NJ. Replacing them with 10rd magazines? Modifying them for you? Once again it would cost them money. That's asking the state to take care of all your needs. Very socialist. I don't want the state involved in supplying my magazines as I don't want them involved with my guns. If you left it up to Trenton they would provide you with a 1 Rd magazine in a bolt action, no evil feature AR that has 5 safeties you have to disengage before you could shoot it. It would also include a timing mechanism so you could only shoot 1 Rd every 20 minutes. They'd still claim they are complying with the 2A.

Oh boy... =) I do disagree with one main point in the article... " But in an act of mass definace, New Jersey residents refuse to comply." I rather think the more appropriate answer is.... "in an unplanned act of mass defiance due to the majority of gun owners unaware of the law."

small parts bonanza......

Yes, she will have to go through the process again..

That's to cover the Glock 17. There are more than a few cops that only own the gun they're issued now. Don't agree with any of these laws but that's the rationale for 17.

Arlo, Nest, Ring and the other similar products have done to surveillance what Apple did to MP3s, it made it stupid easy to set up. But, it comes at a cost. Having an adorable preconfigured system is better than having no system at all, but I do not trust any of them, especially the ones with cloud storage. Wired cameras where possible and wireless NOT on the same network address space as your home network with strong encryption between the wireless cameras and the video server is far far more secure and private. With Arlo, and the likes, you can never be sure who's watching you.

^^^ not his best work

You’d have to be a man first...

Rumor is it has something to do with "swat stacking" and @rayray

All three countries you mentioned above are, by definition in the below links, constitutional monarchies. All three have socialist tendencies but are not socialist governments. Sweden falls into the same category. When you have a government that says who gets what, how much, and at what price, that would be the mark of a socialist government. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_Canada https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_Australia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_the_United_Kingdom

I personally don't like EOTech, but they're good. If you believe a Vortex Sparc AR or PA Red Dot is as good as Aimpoint, MRO, LCO...I got a bridge to sell you. If you're gonna tell me a vortex or PA scope is "just as good" as a Nightforce or Accupoint/Accupower, then I know you're talkin out of your ass

Okay I basically agree with what youre saying but I'll go a little farther. I wouldn't say most cops will act. I'd say nearly all cops will act. While we're very focused on self defense here, justifiably so, there are plenty of situations where cops risk their lives that are not gunfighting. Burning buildings, drowning kids, and many other situations occur where cops risk their lives. How many times have you seen a burning building and everyone stands out on the sidewalk watching people hanging out windows yelling for help? Usually the cops are the first on the scene and they do what they have to do. Firefighters and EMS people risk their lives all the time to help people without gunfighting. So do many private citizens. We can always cherry pick and bring up some isolated incident to make a point. That doesn't make it the norm.

I usually hate conversations like this because of the perceived cop bashing however, I think this has been a good discussion here by all. hats off to everyone discussions are needed as the problems and inequities we are seeing are only going to get worse over the coming decade as the state's financial footing worsens, demographics change and more

I agree! These laws are deeply troubling because they run afoul of more than just the 2nd Amendment. Where the hell is due process here? Where is the protection for the accused from an ill-intentioned person making false claims? These red flag laws are a Constitutional nightmare in my opinion. And on a purely practical note, how in the hell do these laws promote public safety (which is what they purport to do)? If the person targeted actually IS crazy and violent, and you seize their property, well now you've just gone and given them an actual reason to be angry... and then sent them home. Once they're home, they're perfectly free to order a machete, build a few pipe bombs, rent a big bone-crushing truck... or whatever else a true madman does. They can use any manner of really common, readily available items to kill and maim. These laws just make NO SENSE whatsoever when you logically dissect what they do!

The Kavanaugh show is not just SOP for a judge. They tried it and it failed. Fortunately there are men like Kavanaugh who are willing to fight for what's right. They no doubt discuss the potential of the bs they may have to endure with their families. Their families are willing to back them. There are some who want to give up fighting for what's right on both sides. You can say things like won't and never and claim the sky is falling like Chicken Little. Then you've prepared yourself to throw in the towel and ready for the Socialist People's Republic of the United States of America. Many on this forum repeatedly comment all lawsuits should be filed and the enemy immediately attacked. It is obvious they fail to recognize an important factor in winning. That is strategy. They have no concept of thinking on the long term strategic level. They want to use the shotgun approach which is generally a waste of assets. Thank God they didn't run WW2 or we'd be speaking German and Japanese now. If you want to win on the battlefield or on politics strategy is important. The difference is on the battlefield you defeat the enemy and it's over. Politics is a continual fight and influences all 3 branches of government. Congress and the Senate can change every 2 years. The POTUS every 4. SCOTUS is the most stable as they appointed for life. Whether you agree with the makeup of the court is not material to your argument. It is what it is. The lucrative retirement SCOTUS is offered is there to encourage turnover. Fight smart. Don't fight stupid. Pick the time and the place for your fight.

" But in an act of mass defiance, New Jersey residents refuse to comply." Should say: But in an act of patriotism , New Jersey residents follow the United States Constitution.

I disagree as history has proven otherwise. that said, NRA is failing in the simplest of marketing campaigns. Gun control was started to keep guns out of the hands of blacks. We need to use this....

It's going to take a different type of "contribution" to stop these Democrats from passing unconstitutional laws.

just move to pa they said......

Yes. My son recently gave me a nice tour of Pittsburgh starting at Pitt, but it is the second largest democrat stronghold in Pennsylvania. It is assumed that both the governor and the democrat attorney general (the previous AG is currently behind bars!!!) will do nothing to stop this, so either a promise of lawsuit of an actual lawsuit will probanly be in order here, to hold these lawless democrats liable for violation of the Commonwealth's preemption law. It is also a current toppic of discussion on pafoa.org. i am ready to contribute as well.

You win the Internet today!!

At least our last governor pardoned several folks who broke the law unintentionally, I dont think this will be the case for the new one, i believe they are aching to make an example of some poor working guy who is not up to speed and gets jacked up

Here's a great comment posted at that link that really sums it up: ...."Here is the exact example of government turning its citizens into criminals just by passing laws that on one day you are not a criminal and the next you are, and the only thing you did was get up take a shower, go to work to support you and your family, like you do every day, but now through one political parties goals of disarming its citizens today you get up take a shower, go to work to support you and your family but at the end of your work day through political legislation you are now a criminal, not just a criminal but a felon. Please explain to me how is it we have a political system that can make criminals out of normal everyday citizens because they want to. This should be illegal to be able to do altogether. "