Leaderboard

Lemme go out on a limb here, and say that despite the title of the video, this is NOT the "Ultimate in Personal Protection".

Are you guys going to make out? Because if you are I'm going back to the firewood discussion.

This whole thing is pretty weird because one of the demands among anti-gunners is to pass laws requiring gun owners to carry insurance, similar to car insurance, an analogy they are fond of using. And yet, they then turn around and call it "murder insurance." I'm pretty sure this would eventually be found unconstitutional, but NJ just makes laws, and the Constitution be damned.

More time to yell at kids to get off your lawn.... And you think Pork Roll is called talyor ham. Yup definatly twisted

Zeke be like, Then, PK be like, And now, Scorpio be like.

Quite a bit in the making but yay! Join on YouTube at 9pm ET.

For those under 40 and don't know. Sanka is a brand of instant decaffeinated coffee, sold around the world, and was one of the earliest decaffeinated varieties. Sanka is distributed in the United States by Kraft Foods. Wikipedia › wiki › Sanka

I was unaware that any PD's were still accepting hardcopy applications. The FARS system helps to level the playing field somewhat, but you are still dependent on the local PD for the actual permits, but the process has better transparency. You will need the ORI number and then go to this site... https://www.njportal.com/NJSP/FARS ...and follow the instructions. You will need a credit card and I think it is now $21 (that's still $18 for the Mental Health check, but there is a $3 "convenience" fee added). You will be notified when each of your references responds and again when the criminal background check is completed. Your local PD will notify you when you can pick-up your permits. One other thing that has changed is that your references can be family members or relatives. Welcome back to the fold. Adios, Pizza Bob

Any more than that and you'll go blind.

Its took me 3 years to strategize all of that.. My wood shed is now right at the end of my driveway... I pull wood twice a week with a garden cart and park it next to the door under my deck. Easy peasy Its sounds miserable at first... but the warm, WARM! House is far worth it without burning a large hole in my wallet. Oil is just way too expensive to run the house at 70. I would go through 200 gallons in just Feb alone, January and March are not far behind. With wood only burning when im home. I go through about 400 gallons of oil a year for heat. I have no idea how people heat their large houses with oil up here in Sussex. Either their houses are cold, or they are paying an enormous amount on money.

Behave yourselves, children.

In before the lock

I firmly believe that in the end it will be removed as an infringement.

If you have the inclination, shoot me a PM. enjoy the day.

Thank but that photo isn’t my rifle. Mine is similar though. I’d love to take you up on that offer but I probably won’t be able to for like 2-3 weeks. I haven’t even broken in the barrel yet.

It's an accurate rifle out-of-the-box for the money. I would recommend replacing the MIM cocking piece. It's a known problem on the RPR. Anarchy Outdoors has a nice billet replacement.

@Noobwithquestions You may want to fill your profile out so other members can know where you're from. If you have other questions, location can be very helpful(it also adds credibility). Cool rifle, BTW. Is it strictly a display piece or do you plan on shooting it? Where do you shoot? If you're able to on a Monday, I'm happy to guest you in to Cherry Ridge so you can run some rounds thru it at 100/200/300 yards. Get to see what it's capable of. Just shoot me a PM if interested with contact info.

Yet another move to look like you're trying to do something without actually addressing a root issue. Wanna reduce gun-related crime? Get to the root of the problem!

Yeah... no. The trigger on a HP is totally different. Ergos as well. And yes, I know you're mostly busting chops.

I have CCW Safe. It is not an insurance contract, hence not subject to regulation by the State of N.J. In fact, it is far superior to any insurance contract you can purchase because it also covers expert fees which most do not. Also, it is doubtful that what Murphy is doing by executive order is even constitutional.

And I be like:

Welcome home, brother.

@Sniper seriously what's the big deal with answering noob questions

Everyone needs to switch to Sanka...

He looks like a Douche Bag in EVERY picture

Hahahaha!!

So, what was the point of your first post? There is no statement or question by you. Only a link, which is cearly in violation of the rules. @Mrs. Peel Seeing that you directed it to another member, this could have taken to a PM. Oh I get it now, you're the Class Clown. Owned. Beotch.

protip: SCOTUS is not big on hearing all viewpoints, that's what the paperwork is for. Most people who want to speak during oral arguments are told to go pound sand. The solicitor general gets to. It is literally his job. The solicitor general LITERALLY has an office in the supreme court building. They also appear before the court more frequently than anyone else. Saying that because the solicitor general gets to speak, we need to hear out every fucktard who can file an amicus brief is stupid. It's stupid no matter the subject matter of the case. It is nearly as stupid as suggesting that because there's a conservative jsutice showing up and speaking, that we need to let all voices from the left be heard there. You can read the pile of shit argument here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-280/112062/20190812163502955_Amicus Brief of Corpus Linguistics Professors and Experts.pdf I will put forth as something to keep in mind with regard to their argument this question: Do we generate more documents, especially the government, with regards to the machinations of war, or with regard to Farmer ted running around with his hunting rifle? Because the entirety of their argument is that because the majority of written use is referring to one context, nothing written down could be of another context. Despite the fact they slyly admit that not all usage was referring to a military when discussing the bearing of arms. It would be kind of like me arguing you can't be an artist without being famous and citing as evidence the sheer pile of news, media postings, etc. that refer to famous musicians and actors and such as artists and then saying there are lots more of those occurrences than other uses of the word artist. Thus, first amendment protections on art as free speech should only apply to artists that are famous because that is the most prevalent use of the work and thus its dominant meaning in all cases. Which is total bullshit. It's a gun grabbing academic smelling their own farts and telling you they smell fine. It also completely ignores the fact that even if you do accept that bearing arms was primarily used in a context discussing military entities, you are talking about the context of a document written at the time where the only military was supposed to be the people. We weren't supposed to have a frikin standing army. So what frikin military were they reserving that right to?

Fire wood is split to dry it out quicker. Wet wood doesn’t burn well.

What, you don't wear eye protection?

Well, if your neighbors are snowbirds, you just run a couple extension cords over from their place to plug in your space heaters. I have found this can be very economical.