Leaderboard

I scored this... and this... Adios, Pizza Bob

Pandemic, elections, and gearing up for CW2. You’re late to the party.

All ammo to sell and a few storage cans are sold. Not worth keeping open for the remainder of cans. Thank you all buyers and thank you especially to the NJGun Forum mods for running the site. Lock it up!

..... buy buy buy buy !!!!

I'd wait as Trump is going to win and the country will open up, less concern over Dem encroachment on rights and general nutiness

No kidding. Just got my permit on Friday afternoon. I'm moving as fast as I can.

Interesting, our country is without ammo and guns in stores, NICS taking 3-4 days and now we can't get permits for 50 days. Jeez, this state is s...!!!!

please note your 1884 does NOT have the round bayonet, it is just the cleaning rod.................Cheers

Some real smart guy on here said way back in like 2008..... "Want to restrict guns, go after the ammo...." its a 50cal ammo can he is referring to @silverado427

gun rights, ammo included, is a right and you will always be able to get. the challenge is how much and how many hoops the left tries to impose. With the new court, my guess we'll see a lot of 2A cases hit the courts

More so because of the Dem statements of defund the police and the looting be allowed to take place.

IMG_5023.MOV

Nobody remembers Juan Sánchez-Villalobos Ramírez? There can be only one!

Can I special order it in .45acp? I don't own any 9mm's. That's the caliber that lost 2 world wars!

SOLD

10000000% No disagreement there - notice I always state it should not be an impediment, a hurdle etc. However, you would I am sure would agree, that we must carefully ensure that there is no limitation of peoples rights as enumerated in the BOR. But, at the same time, we can look to expand and preserve those rights with enhancements that might lead to something that is good for the whole. Assume, we can mandate training and as part of that training, you can now obtain a CWP - nationwide, or in your state, which I now you can ! SC has the CWP class that must be passed in order to carry in state, within the rules as set forth and laws that have been promulgated. Are you suggesting that SC for example should be like VT, and be Constitutional Carry? Now, there is a difference between ownership and carry, I know, but I do think that training can and should be offered free and be part of the ownership process.

How about you show us in the Constitution where foregrips, telescoping stocks and standard mags are not allowed? They do today. There's this store called Walmart, ever hear of them. You can buy guns and milk. But that would be in a free state, you won't find that in your neighborhood Walmart in NJ. BTW, @El Jefe I'm still waiting on your answer why restrict "assault" weapons, when it's clear, based on FBI data, that steak knife on your kitchen counter, is way more dangerous. Shouldn't these be restricted? They kill 6 TIMES more people than your "assault" rifles.

No, just trying to supply perspective and stir the pot on training...... But I would submit, that anyone that owns a gun should realize that they may be called to provide for some sort of "militia duty" - ' every able bodied man ' etc. The problem is there are extremes on all sides - somewhere in the middle makes sense. I have seen such pervasive incorrect handling, where the case can be made for mandatory training - if there is mandatory training, such as DL, where I can drive anywhere - I should be able to carry anywhere. (yeah I get it a DL is nor a 'right') and very true. Then again the case for training, if mandated should be *free*, to ' every able bodied person ' - there should be no hurdle to exercise a right, monetary or otherwise and if that hurdle or qualification is placed, it should be not used to infringe. The Anti-Federalists had it right.... States rights - the centralized Government *has* become all that we fought to get away from.

just left the 2 statements that i have issue with. the ONLY control of "assault" rifles should be....well.....none. who would set the standards for said mandatory training? who would administer it? how would we prevent it from being used to infringe on us? oh wait.....making it required to own IS infringement.,