Leaderboard

Turnout was under 38.5% ridiculously low. If all the gun owners had shown up, we would have won easily.

Oh, and the redneck flames in the grill are a free bonus.

This happened to me last summer. But I had the day off, it was raining, and I felt like being a pain in the a$$ so I called and complained about their stupidity. Ended up with a $20 gift card and a useless apology. Ordered the ammo boxes off of Amazon while I was on the phone with Wallyworld.

NOPE. all incumbents if i remember correctly. she's not voting for any of them. he's still "deciding" who gets to carry. that's not cool, no matter who ya are.

Here's some more from American Thinker. The Supreme Court bans most warrantless gun seizures from homes - American Thinker And from the Daily Wire. SCOTUS’ Decision On Illegal Search And Seizure Opens The Door For Gun Owners To Challenge Red Flag Laws | The Daily Wire And yet more from my go-to lawyer in PA, Joshua Prince: SCOTUS Decision on Warrantless Gun Seizure Isn’t What It’s Being Touted To Be… – Prince Law Offices Blog A real 2nd Amendment supporting lawyer's opinion.

It isn't logic. It's bullshit. The dude in india or some other foreign call center doesn't know why it's restricted. They just see that it is restricted and are telling you politley. "fuck off.. it's restricted because it's restricted." Now why it is restricted is probably because it is misidentified somehow in their ordering system. Back before Cabelas was sold to anyone not cabelas, they had excellent customer service. They would ship me a 10 round 10/22 rotary mag, but not the 3 pack that was discounted. I eventually got it fixed and the reason was that someone putting the sku in inventory put the capacity identifier at 30 rather than 10 and that field was put there to handle shipping restrictions. Walmart may have set a bot to flag all ammo and it grabbed the can for having ammo in the description and failed to distinguish between a can to hold ammo and a can full of ammo. Or it could be because someone decided they might get sued for selling it here because they can't read the law. Whatever it is the computer says no and wal mart isn't the type of place to fix that unless the mechanism is the logistics system says it sold X units less than predicted and for that they will replace it with a new similar item in inventory and that one doesn't get mis-filed.

Definitely try out the Walther before buying, my wife fell in love with the M&P 380 EZ, she is very small with small hands, the M&P was much easier for her to manipulate. She also wanted a .22 once I told her how much the .380 ammo was and that once she went through tho 1k rounds I bought for her she was on her own. She tried the Walther .22 but ultimately felt the Ruger SR22 was a better fit for her, she loves that gun also. The Ruger 10/22 is an awesome rifle, everyone should own one, it’s a ton of fun to shoot and doesn’t break the bank to go through a couple hundred rounds.

It's a bloodbath! The end is nigh! Either that or a buying opportunity. I'm selling my truck and my car. If I had that money today, I'd dump every penny into BTC.

Good guy with a gun intervenes in attempted mass killing, blows gunman away. Neighbors say it could have been much worse. - TheBlaze

I was walking the next day and walking without help (cane, etc) in about a week. The limiting factor will prob be how long your Dr says you have to wait to drive - you can’t stay sitting too long for the time being

I'm on a conference call with Jack Ciattarelli as I type: He had made it clear that he supports president Trump and that he supports the Second Amendment. He wants to roll back the onerous rules and regulations that we currently live under. He has stated that the 10 round magazine limit doesn't promote public safety and he support expansion of concealed carry, at least at first into dangerous professions and then further. He gave the example of female real estate agents who say that being by themselves during open houses isn't safe. He was CLEAR and didn't EQUIVOCATE on the subject at all. He also pointed out that he had a B or B+ rating from the NRA while in the assembly.

First . . . I would suggest that the system isn't "backlogged". That implies that there is more than can be done. The problems in LE sitting on the work and delaying the processing. Second, there are people working on creating movement in the state but that is going to require a large amount of turnover in the legislature this fall AND a new governor. One or the other will not get it done and it may take several election cycles to effect change in the legislature. I'm running for assembly and I support both a rollback of the draconian system of rules that NJ residents have been forced to live under AND Constitutional Carry. My opponent, majority leader Greenwald, hasn't met a gun restriction that he doesn't like. But, just electing me isn't going to change things. We need a concerted effort on the local level to elect people who will support our rights. Everyone needs to get out and find out when their representative and their challenger believe and vote accordingly. People have a tendency to think that their representative is a "good guy" and the that the other representatives are the "problem". We can't all be right.

Thats the big question. Are in person votes going to be provisional so the dems can figure out how many phony paper ballots they need to win?

Hold on a second: "In Justice Samuel Alito wrote a concurring opinion for the ruling in which he addressed existing “red flag” laws that also call into question Fourth Amendment rights. “This case also implicates another body of law that petitioner glossed over: the so-called “red flag” laws that some States are now enacting. These laws enable the police to seize guns pursuant to a court order to prevent their use for suicide or the infliction of harm on innocent persons,” Alito wrote. “They typically specify the standard that must be met and the procedures that must be followed before firearms may be seized,” he continued. “Provisions of red flag laws may be challenged under the Fourth Amendment, and those cases may come before us. Our decision today does not address those issues.” Underline mine. So red flag laws with standards and procedures are still lawful.

Armed parents confront machete-wielding woman near child’s birthday party, CA cops say (yahoo.com)

Protester fires back at suspect shooting outside women's clinic, saves woman's life (yahoo.com)

Magpuls > https://www.brownells.com/magazines/handgun-magazines/magazines/pmag-gl9-9x19-magazine-for-glock-19-prod115612.aspx - Glocks > Unable to locate any in stock.

Diner in Louisville draws handgun as armed BLM protesters swarm restaurant (yahoo.com)