Leaderboard

Chip passed away a few days ago. If you haven't heard of him, as a competitor, as a gunsmith, as an inventor, you've at least used things he had a hand in creating: 8 round 1911 mags, drop-in match triggers, Kimber and STI/Staccato pistols. Chip McCormick

Then I would forget it. If he's stopped in NY with a CC that has a NY address, but his DL is Florida, any average NY police officer would immediately conclude something was wrong. The NY house is in his parents name. I assume then his residence in FL is in his name. That means he's domiciled in FL. And I don't think NY state would issue a CC to a person domiciled in FL who 'lives' at his parents house from time to time. If true, than his NY CC would be considered invalid. We are domiciled in NJ in the home we own. I We also own a house in PA. So we are true dual-state residents. And my sheriff in PA agrees to issue PA LTCFs to us as residents of PA. Your friend, I suspect, would not under any circumstance be considered legal for a NY state resident CC.

Not many youngsters know....or want to know....

Anyone here shoot .38 Super Auto? Please contact me privately - [email protected] --Thx --Rich

Let's put this MYTH to rest, FOREVER & RIGHT NOW! You may or may not be aware, so for those that AREN'T here goes: I transport weapons registered to a man that's been DEAD since 1982! Upon my father's passing, my mother laid his entire modest collection out on display on the dinning room table for her three offspring to divvy-up. NO PAPERWORK! Cause that's how it was done back then! Am I supposed to go dig them both up (Mom died in '95) and ask them where's the P2P's? I've been "behind the trigger" for nearly half a century. The totality of what I've done and what I know could make a good book. And OPEN LOTS OF EYES to the self-inflicted harassments we continually endure from those that THINK they "know" things...the big one being applying FOPA interstate transport regulations to intrA-state (within NJ) transportation. The fact is the current law doesn't even say that your Yellow Card has to be IN YOUR POSSESSION, it merely states you have to be granted one to be in compliance of the exception / exemption you're transporting under.... ~R

Awwww man! I saw the thread title and thought a “monster jam” was about some kind of a heinous weapon malfunction and I came here to say “Throw it over the berm”. I have nothing else to add. Sorry!

Find a new FFL.

for now

The only thing that will help him is the ability to show that he is operating under the exemption which allows transportation directly between his home and the range. For all the good an FPIC will do, he may as well show his social security card. If you are stopped riding a motorcycle and you present a DL without a motorcycle endorsement, do you think you'll avoid prosecution because you have shown that you can drive "some" vehicle? If it makes you feel better to imagine what offenses a cop might make up out of thin air and try to come up with a way to protect yourself from those by pretending documents have properties that they do not actually have, who am I to stop you? However, for the rest of the people reading this: Possession of neither a handgun nor hollowpoint ammunition is excused by the possession of an FPIC. I also carry my FPIC all the time, but that is in case I want to use it for it's actual purpose. i.e. buying a long gun, buying pistol ammo or renewing my driver's license.

For Christ's sake! He didn't say "whatever the legislature allows" . . . He didn't say, "Everything is on the table if the legislature pushes it on me . . . " He talked about what is fucking possible. Without the legislature, he probably can't do shit. Why should he say otherwise? Do you want him to pound the table in favor of the Second Amendment and then not be able to do anything because of opposition in the legislature? Listen to him . . . He's tell you that, even as governor, he will be virtually powerless on the issue with gains in the legislature. The same is true about Singh and Rizzo but they won't tell you that until AFTER they are elected. THAT is what politicians do. They make promises that they know they can't keep and they hope that you don't notice that they will not be able to keep them.

Yep . . . But, they back people who can win and make progress. The only way to stop them is to WIN. There are no moral victories. You thing Singh or Rizzo is the guy to restore your rights? They have to win in order to do it. Keep supporting losers and you will keep getting deeper in the whole. Notice how all of the Leftists think they like Socialism? See how they don't select the Socialist, Bernie Sanders, to be their flag bearer? They know that he can't win so they put up a candidate who can.

And we ALL know what happened to that Weimar firearm registry after January 1933. "... the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."