Leaderboard

It's like $150-$200 annually. Discounts if you are doing a family membership

Don't forget, it's not "insurance" per se. It's a legal support service. Totally worth it in my opinion, but it's not insurance. If there is a civil judgment (or settlement) against someone, it won't act as insurance. I researched plans that include insurance and as soon as you try to check out with a NJ address, they basically cancel the check-out process. I guess NJ feels that the only time there could be a financial risk against someone is if they were wrong in their actions, but in my opinion this is flawed. Civil liability standards are different from criminal and settlements don't imply fault necessarily. I wish the NJ law against insurance would be challenged.

You need to upload a copy of your firearms ID Card with your order. Their website states if you don't upload it within 24 hours your order will be canceled. Paul, you're such an enabler!! Bought a couple.

I’m sending that to Mrs Tex!

A very cranky woman "in her senior years" was arrested for shoplifting at a grocery store. She gave everyone a hard time, from the store manager to the security guard to the arresting officer who took her away. She complained and criticized everything and everyone throughout the process. When she appeared before the judge, the judge asked her what she had stolen from the store. The lady defiantly replied, "Just a stupid can of peaches." The judge then asked why she had done it. She replied, "I was hungry and forgot to bring any cash to the store." The judge asked how many peaches were in the can. She replied in a nasty tone, "Nine! But why do you care about that?" The judge answered patiently, "Well, ma'am, because I'm going to give you nine days in jail -- one day for each peach." As the judge was about to drop his gavel, the lady's long-suffering husband raised his hand slowly and asked if he might speak. The judge said, "Yes sir, what do you have to add?" The husband said meekly, "Your Honor, she also stole two cans of peas."

Again...the restrictions portion was put in there to apply to a security guard job where the restriction was you could only carry while working. That is changed now. There are no more restrictions. It clearly says "One permit shall be sufficient for all handguns owned by the holder". I am not an english major but it says what it says.

I dont find this muddy at all.. One permit shall be sufficient for all handguns owned by the holder Pretty straightforward right there.... The permit shall apply only to a handgun carried by the actual and legal holder of the permit. The permit to carry a handgun, shall apply only to a handgun that you have ownership of, as the permit holder and owner of said handgun.

What a bunch of bullshit. They already have a task force. 60 days community service is bullshit too. How about 3yrs in a juvenile detention center. When there is no deterrent that this is what you get. We need a few of the little punks to whip out a piece and get blasted...they will get the hint then.

We would have been better off if Roberts and Kavanaugh kept their opinion to themselves. If we go by SCOTUS track record, its going to be another 10 years and 100s of thousands of people's rights denied before they take up another case. And by then who knows. Roberts was enough of a sell out, now I have feeling we got Kavanaugh as well in that category. There is real danger that future cases may see a 5 libs / sellouts vs 4 constitutionalists.

Don't think this has been shared here yet. 2C:58-4. Permits to carry handguns a. Scope and duration of authority. Any person who holds a valid permit to carry a handgun issued pursuant to this section shall be authorized to carry a handgun in all parts of this State, except as prohibited by section 2C:39-5e. One permit shall be sufficient for all handguns owned by the holder thereof, but the permit shall apply only to a handgun carried by the actual and legal holder of the permit.

***DELETED***

***DELETED***

Right. When I saw that image I immediately thought of the Bush/Dan Rather memo fiasco that should have been in Courier typeface. I don't think I've ever seen anyone use Courier in a word processor. And who the hell still has a typewriter laying around? (Oops! Mrs. 45Doll still has my mother's L.C. Smith from the 1940's in her office as a paperweight. But I didn't type that letter!)

Looks like those new New York carry permits are already out of control 3 shot during pool party attended by hundreds at luxury hotel on Long Island (msn.com)

Correct. The State Police do not delegate policy or procedure to municipalities. As mentioned, official internal memos/directives are conducted with a letter head, and also must include a recipient/s. Not to mention it can't be "from" the entirety of the NJSP... its from whomever( the actual person) wrote it. It's not even a question if that's fake. Who ever did that is a complete moron.

A believe this to be a fake! Someone is toying with us....If it was real it would come from the NJ AG office and would not include numerous grammar and sentence structure discrepancies. It's bullshit!

Yep, looks like it was done on a Smith Corona typewriter. Also info is contrary to what is posted on NJSP website. What a shame, since it's closer to how it should be (although still too restrictive).

***DELETED***

NJSP confirmed the letter is not real and I am removing it.

It doesn't matter (to them) that all these challenges end up in courts. Its well established that anti-2A NJ, NY etc DO NOT CARE. There are no real consequences to keep pushing ridiculous laws. They just have to keep making them faster than courts (which NJ is notorious for dragging their feet and siding with liberals) are willing to handle.

If they are treating retired officers. Aka plain old citizens. Differently than the rest of the plain old citizens, that’s probably not going to end well in court.

SO. In jersey we now have potentially THREE separate "carry" standards for the same, on paper, CCW permit now? Standard #1: I have had a jersey "restricted" "carry" permit for 10 years now. I can carry in jersey, pretty much anywhere (and beyond) at work. Standard #2: Retired law enforcement. Can carry pretty much anywhere in jersey, I believe as well. And very similar renewals etc, like my current/active permit. Standard #3: "Civilian" CCW (under Murph's Alinsky style Rules for Radicals definitions) maybe OFF LIMITS in certain arbitrary "gun free zones", retail establishmemts, restaurants, movie theaters, 'buffer zones', "public safety" 'zones', 'sensitive areas', parks, 'crowded' areas, and etc, etc, etc... and etc.... The depths of the feel good STUPIDITY of this state's utter non-sense is beyond any and all human comprehension. PLENTY of low hanging fruit and material for EASY immediate future open-and-shut lawsuits and Class Actions for any good ambitious attorney(s) to devour and make a name for themselves.

Whilst there are people who can shoot a SA revolver as fast as a DA it all falls apart if you need a reload. Not likely but something one needs to plan for. I would not feel unarmed with a SA revolver but I'd rather have something else. A small 380 would serve better as a backup gun than any derringer.. JMO, WTF do I know?

***DELETED***

Just wondering who these instructors are and what course of fire and what training are they qualifying you under? I have yet to hear what training course is being accepted by the judge that is expected to sign off on the permit. I read that the training needs to be equivalent to the PTC course which is much more involved than some NRA basic safety course or a hunter ed.... Please advise

I don’t think it is clear, and likely depends on what you consider national reciprocity. I don’t think we could get to the final answer in one case Fundamental to the ruling is that the typical citizen has the right to both own and carry arms. You don’t cease having 1a rights when you cross a border. It is also not the case that constitutional rights are tiered. It would not shock me to see a future case establish that carrying cannot be more burdened than purchasing. I also see it as 100% that every state would need to offer permits to out of staters. Not doing so by reciprocity could very feasible be found to be burdensome. I suspect the federal government could create a law setting a standard due to the disparity causing issues with interstate commerce. But that wouldn’t be crafted whole by the court, nor should it be

like in other states....you should be able to carry any gun you legally own without restriction...........OMO.

***DELETED***

Maloney introduces legislation targeting firearm industry (yahoo.com) "One of the pieces of legislation would make it illegal for a firearm importer or manufacturer to sell guns to a retailer or distributor known or suspected of engaging in practices that could pose a threat to the misuse or criminal use of a firearm. The bill would also require databases to be created by the firearm importers and manufacturers to keep track of when their products are misused or used in crimes. The second measure would impose a 20 percent tax on the total revenue for manufacturers or importers that sell semiautomatic assault weapons and would incorporate those funds toward a community violence intervention and prevention trust fund." ------ Databases. Hear that, folks? And taxes. Remember this come November!!!