Leaderboard

@Ed471 Make sure you call the PA FFL and make sure they will accept it that way. Some FFLs will only accept a firearm to transfer if its sent to them from an FFL - this as a matter of their store policy, not law. I’d hate for you to take the ride out there and they tell you they won’t accept it from a private seller.

For sale: Used FN FNAR semiautomatic rifle. 20" heavy barrel marked 7.62x51 but the FN manual says .308Win as well. I bought this rifle used so do not know the total round count. I don't have much time or places to take it out to stretch it to the distance it is capable of so it has been sitting in my safe for a few years. I have rung steel with it at 800 yards. It will come as pictured with 3 10 round magazines. https://photos.app.goo.gl/PaTU9vP1pRXN5zbJ9 https://photos.app.goo.gl/NYxdb8JKfuNE3JYL8 Looking for $800 $700. FPIC and valid photo ID required. I am willing to travel a reasonable distance to meet at an FFL for the transfer - buyer pays fees. The first to post "I'll take it" wins the sale

You can transport it to PA yourself, but as you appear to know already, the transfer must be done through an FFL.

Yes, the big plunge. The funny thing was the attitude of our friends during our POSSLQ years. Five years in: No one cares because it's fashionable to be living together. Ten years in: "So why don't you two just get married?" Fifteen years in: "For god's sake, don't get married and screw it up! You got a good thing going!"

Harland Williams appeared on Gutfeld!, and following a viewing of an interview with Gweneth Paltrow he remarked: "Listen I bought Gweneth's candle. You know, the one that smells like her V-J-J? Well after I burned it that's what my whole house smelled like. I had to douche my curtains. And if that wasn't bad enough my attic got a yeast infection. I had to buy a Brad Pitt penis candle to kind of balance it all out." Note: not an exact quote, but I definitely captured the essence. Of the joke, not the candle.

Shout out to @Krdshrk - who met with me last week so I could try some guns, look at some holsters, etc. That enigma holster is certainly interesting. I could see getting one of those down the road - because they would work with skirts or pants without belt loops (which is a "thing" in my wardrobe). I have a growing realization that my original title on this thread is rather inaccurate (or exaggerated) - although it's certainly a bit more complicated for a woman's wardrobe, it's not so cut and dry for a guy either! I'm beginning to realize that everyone (male or female) needs to adapt in some way to carrying - often with multiple holsters & belts, some changes to their usual wardrobe, etc. I thought women had it a LOT worse... but it's maybe only like 20% worse! I am learning a lot.

Maybe I'm being dense. I honestly can't tell if this is a joke... if it's a joke, then "ha-ha, ya got me good!" If it's NOT a joke... let me give you a woman's perspective: while you hustled on those two jobs to support your family (and all due credit to you, good sir... sounds like you were a great provider)... I notice you neglected to mention that you also paid for a nanny...or a housekeeper? If that wasn't by accident, may I assume that it was your wife who bore the brunt of domestic bliss like: wiping snotty noses? waking up at midnight to soothe a feverish child? changing disgusting, dirty diapers? running kids back and forth to dr's app'ts & after-school events? fixing them an after-school snack and going over their homework? doing the family laundry? cooking family meals? cleaning up after those meals? packing school lunches? cleaning the house? etc., etc. If so, oh, she worked alright! She just didn't work "outside the home". And if your 3 kids are already through college, then I presume you've been married 25+ years? And you think it might be a good idea to just drop THIS on her: "Hey, I've decided to split the money into separate accounts..."??? Oh, goodness... you might want to slow your roll and think that through! Because I can just about guarantee you, that plan will be the equivalent of taking a hatchet to the family you so carefully built over the decades. Don't get me wrong... I can absolutely see the wisdom of pre-nups, separate + joint accounts, etc. for that new couple (young or old) who doesn't have the history and built-up trust of an established couple. But if you start proposing money changes NOW... at this late stage of your marriage?... I can promise you, she's going to think you've met someone else and you're planning to leave her high and dry. She'll likely be distraught AND suspicious... your kids will undoubtedly catch wind of it... and THEY will be suspicious of you, too (logically, since you're the one proposing the change). Everything you've built - or should I say, the IMPORTANT things - like the respect and goodwill your wife and kids hold for you - POOF! Gone in an instant. For what? If you have tangible, solid, proven reasons to distrust her, that's ONE thing... but to wreck your presumably decent family relations FOR NO GOOD REASON because of what someone wrote on a gun forum... OH, PLEASE TELL ME YOU WERE JOKING!

So after rummaging through our records and some joint conversation I've pieced together the prenuptial agreement process from 30 years ago. I wrote out in plain English what our intentions were, and what we wanted the prenup to do. My lawyer turned that into a legalese document. I reviewed that and corrected what he got wrong. He made the necessary revisions and gave it back. I then reviewed the 'final' version and wrote down what I thought the legalese meant, to make sure I wasn't reading it wrong. I didn't misread it, so he finalized it, her lawyer reviewed it, and we signed off. So actually I never had a digital copy of the final legal document; just the hard copies. Side note: We operated this way for 18 years before we got married. And after we married nothing changed. Who knew? Here is the final plain English summary of what the prenup meant: Page 1. We're getting married, and we want to decide in advance the claims we will and will not have against each other as a result of the marriage, including all rights as stated. We think this is a good idea. Therefore, we agree as follows: Paragraphs: 1. We each know the assets and liabilities of the other, and have attached the detailed schedules. We're satisfied we know enough. 2. This only affects us once we marry. 3. We each retain the ownership of everything we now individually own, and the future worth of same, and will do so in the future. This property will not become community property. Also, any property we individually acquire during the marriage by gift, prize, bequest, inheritance etc. will not be community property. 4. Anything not covered by 3, along with our current joint property, will be community property. The real estate will be divided regardless of how it's titled. 5. If we divorce, neither of us is obligated to support the other. 6. We are suspending the rights normally granted to us as each other's spouse. We can still leave whatever we want to each other in a will, and be the personal representative of the other. And this agreement will not supersede the rights of ownership in jointly held property. 7. Life insurance must be addressed. 8. Our lawyers have explained the law, and this agreement, to us. We agree it's fair, and we want to do it. Neither of us is coercing the other. This agreement will cover the property distribution in the event of death or divorce. (Therefore, we need wills.) 9. Money and property held by each of us before the marriage, will still be ours individually. 10. Joint property and money will be community property, and will be split 50/50. 11. Standard agreement disclaimer. 12. This agreement binds our heirs. 13. We agree to sign all necessary papers. 14. We may modify the provisions of this agreement, but only in writing. 15. We'll each pay our own lawyers. 16. Getting away with something doesn't mean anyone agreed to anything!

Gun For Hire Radio #624 soon the Bumb will drop her decision, “other” updates incoming, top 5 Ranges in the NE, women with guns have less rights in NY, who knew? https://gunforhire.com/blog/the-gun-for-hire-radio-broadcast-episode-624/ IMG_3262.mov

Excellent. In hindsight we didn't really need a prenuptial agreement. And over the years we have in fact had lopsided 'joint' expenditures that one of us chose to pay more for because we wanted to and could. I think that's called 'teamwork'. From my perspective, the primary reason we did a prenup was: For Her - She'd had been married once and got screwed in the divorce. Basically walked away with a few thousand she came in with, and a '66 Chevelle with a three-speed on the column, no A/C and manual brakes. Wow! Thanks for the 10 year ride! I definitely did not want her to get 'screwed' again if by chance something happened to my personality that was beyond my imagination. For Me - I finally concluded that if my real intentions were as big as my mouth, I shouldn't have any problem putting it in writing and signing on the dotted line. Plus it was good exercise to compose my thoughts on paper. In other words: trust, but verify. I think tomorrow I'll have a summary of our prenup. And another short story.

That's not a mistake in the law, that's a feature .

The legislature passed, and Murphy will sign on Monday, the misleadingly-named Election Transparency Act. This gives the governor nearly complete control over the Election Law Enforcement Commission, the watchdog agency that oversees our elections, and also doubles political contribution limits, and greatly weakens pay-to-play laws. As a means to ensure that the party in power always remains in power, it sounds like something right out of the Putin/Jinping playbook. How bad is it? The entire Election Law Enforcement Commission resigned in protest yesterday, and most of them were Democrats. Election Law Enforcement Commissioners Resign Good government groups opposed the bill Act will gut Pay-to-Play protections