GRIZ

You apparently have little knowledge of the justice system outside of theory. You said make the accessories to the crime. Isn't what you're saying is the family member should have reported aberrant behavior to the police? Then what are the police supposed to do? Arrest them? Have the person committed to an institution? Charging someone as an accessory because they SHOULD have known? Sounds like the thought police to me. You need probable cause to arrest and charge someone. Where is your PC in the example you give? If the person had pressed charges against someone who put a gun to his head and the person is convicted of a crime how does that prevent him from doing a mass shooting? It only means he can't but a gun legally. Given enough money and time and you can buy anything you want off the street. The Las Vegas shooter bought a lot of guns and ammo. Based on that a lot of people would call him an enthusiastic shooter. There is no spinning or voices in my head. Actually the opposite may be true. You seem to have issues having an adult conversation with someone you disagree without throwing out insults. Good thing you aren't an attorney because you'd have been out of business a long time ago. I know what planet I live on. There are specific definable circumstances where parents are held liable for actions taken by their children. There are few of them where the parents can be held criminally liable.

Okay, to each his own.

No "spewing" on my part. I'll leave that to you. Anyone charged with a criminal offense needs to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That is called due process and is also in the Constitution. You are talking isolated incidents here. You were talking in very general terms in the post I quoted. That post seems to support a red flag type of law. Pointing a gun at someone's head isn't at crime unless you have a plaintiff. Foolish yes, but not a crime. Are you proposing a central depository of aberrant behavior? Where family, friends, and the police deposit information? Sounds very "Big Brother" to me.

Sounds good but remember if you're going to charge someone criminally you have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. That's embedded in our legal system. So if a spouse, family member, boyfriend, or girlfriend thinks they're acting irrationally they should be able to have that person committed to a mental institution? Maybe we should let the police do it? Sounds like you're supporting some type of red flag law. I've seen some people on this forum exhibit some aberrant behavior in their posts.

Clean your primer pockets before or after sizing. AFAIC its a personal preference. If you tumble deprimed brass it doesn't always mean the primer pockets get cleaned. You can clean your primer pockets with a small screwdriver and a small punch to clean out the flash holes.

Maybe so but if he wants to start reloading a chamfer tool will do the job at lower cost. I've been reloading for only about 45 years. I still don't have a swaging tool. There was a guy a few years ago who won a benchrest competion using an original Lee Loader, where you hammered the brass into the neck sizing die. He used a pocket knife to remove crimps. You can cut or swage the primer pockets. I've seen nothing that convinces me one way is better than the other.

There was one sensible position presented in the first night of the of the Democratic debates. I can't remember who it was but one of his proposals was to have mental health services embedded in schools. Many of the school shootings are done in schools the shooter was attending.

Read NJS 2C:33-4.1, Cyber Harassment, 3rd or 4th degree crime.

@Zeke it all depends. Vermont has been a constitutional carry state before all the others IIRC. They forbid carry in all state buildings and that would include State Police barracks.

Well yes...but you can spend a couple of hundred dollars on a case prep station to do the job or $10 on a chamfer tool.

He has a chamfer and deburring tool on his list. That's all I've been using for over 40 years.

I knew a painter or carpenter that used a flower car for his work vehicle.

They were popular in the 60s and 70s for bands. Usually low mileage and not driven hard. Newer ones are expensive because of the custom coach work. Older ones can be had for around $5000.

This thing swings both ways though. If you feel a state should be able to legalize NFA items made in their state then you also support restrictive state gun laws that mostly effect law abiding citizens. While a state law cannot be contrary to Federal law it can be more restrictive.

A year driving the Weinermobile would look great on anyone's resume!!!!

I don't think Grewal would take this to Federal Courts. The Feds would probably refuse to hear the case as it involves the laws of 2 states.

First there is no entrapment here. You have to have a crime. There is no crime as it's legal to have >10 Rd magazines in Nevada. It is illegal to possess them in NJ, with exceptions. That's why Grewal filed a civil suit. He's grandstanding and I'm sure he'll use his influence to get the "right" judge assigned. As @brucin noted an out of state court order has no bearing with very few exceptions (child custody is one).

I saw it some time ago. Maybe 1980s?

I saw the Weinermobile on the NJTP once.

Yes. Not knocking anyone's modifications to cut the capacity to 10 but a factory 10rd magazine will usually be more reliable. Some magazines can be very expensive and for a few guns out there not made.

Thanx. Missed that.

10.5" barrel he's making a SBR if he puts a stock on it. Most likely too heavy to become a pistol. Either way he can get jammed up by state or Feds or both. As far as creating a "firearm" like the Shockwave or TAC14 I'll let the manufacturers hash that out as far as legality. Trying to find a way to skirt around the law without an army of lawyers will usually wind up with you afoul of the law.

If you put any kind of stock on it it doesn't make a difference how much longer than 26" it has a barrel under 16" so you've built a short barreled rifle. That puts you in violation of NJ and Federal law. Even if you were to "try it out" on the AR rifle lower you have you'd be in violation of the law on both levels. I don't think you'd get that upper down to 50 ounces to be a pistol. If you're talking about building an AR version of the Shockwave which is classed as a "firearm", not a rifle and not a handgun there is a manufacturer trying to get that question answered now.

The only incident I encountered was when buying my Ruger PC9 on line. The supplier only had them with the 17rd magazine in stock and on sale. They sent me an email saying they couldn't ship it to NJ because of the magazine. Rather than go back and forth about it can be shipped to a NJ FFL and the fact I was going to use Glock magazines anyway I told them to ship it without the magazine. Even if they did ship it with the magazine I just would have told the FFL to keep it. I agree with what @Maksim said. I'd rather have factory 10rd mags than neutered higher capacity mags. My G26 mags work fine in my Ruger.