njpilot
Premier Member
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by njpilot
-
-
Renewed my SAF membership early and upgraded to Life Member.
-
Welcome
-
I heard that on tv. Should have looked for the article first. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/december_2012/55_favor_assault_weapons_ban_but_62_oppose_complete_gun_ban Looks like a lot are in favor of the AW, but not a total ban.
-
Poll taken on limiting guns to police and military, etc: Oppose 63% For 23%
-
-
Welcome
-
-
Bite you tongue Ed! I doubt he could get elected on a national level, jeez I hope not.
-
-
What a self serving dishonest douche! I love these A-holes who say they know what the Founders meant when they wrote the 2nd Amendment, like they're medians who spoke with them. How about just reading the Federalist Papers and the other writings of the Founders and you'll know exactly what they meant. http://politicker.com/2012/12/bloomberg-no-one-has-defended-the-second-amendment-as-much-as-i-have/ Bloomberg: No One Has ‘Defended the Second Amendment as Much as I Have’ Mayor Michael Bloomberg may have risen to become the country’s chief critic of lax firearm laws, but on his weekly radio show, he argued that has nothing to do with the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Indeed, Mr. Bloomberg claimed to be the strongest defender of the Second Amendment around. “I don’t think there’s anybody that’s defended the Second Amendment as much as I have, Ray,” Mr. Bloomberg said to a caller who asked him why he was “so against” the constitutional passage . “I think you have a perfect right to buy weapons and keep them for protection or for sport. We have tried to make sure that you have it. The Supreme Court says that there are–consistent with the Second Amendment–you can have reasonable restrictions, so, for example, you can’t buy a nuclear-tipped weapon.” The mayor also offered some possible interpretations of the Second Amendment that differ from those espoused by gun rights advocates. “I don’t think anyone should try to tamper with the Second Amendment,” Mr. Bloomberg explained. “There is a question as to what [in] the Second Amendment was written. You can read it to say they only talked about militias, or you can read it to say they wanted guns in your pocket. I don’t know, that’s up to you.”
-
Not that I buy from them anymore, but Sportsman's Guide shows the PMC X-tac backordered until Oct '13
-
Welcome
-
-
From a Patriot Post email: "Rifles such as the AR-15 are not "assault weapons." The Defense Department says, "Assault rifles are short, compact, selective-fire weapons [i.e., machine guns] that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine-gun and rifle cartridges. Assault rifles have mild recoil characteristics and, because of this, are capable of delivering effective full automatic fire at ranges up to 300 meters." The AR-15 is a civilian semi-automatic weapon that fires intermediate-powered rounds -- one for each distinct pull of the trigger. Such rifles aren't "high-powered," either. Indeed, they aren't legal for deer hunting in many states because their firepower isn't sufficient to reliably take down a deer."
-
I know a lot of people here don't like her, but can't argue with what she writes here: http://patriotpost.us/opinion/15975 "In addition to the Portland mall case, here are a few more examples excluded by the Mother Jones' methodology: -- Mayan Palace Theater, San Antonio, Texas, this week: Jesus Manuel Garcia shoots at a movie theater, a police car and bystanders from the nearby China Garden restaurant; as he enters the movie theater, guns blazing, an armed off-duty cop shoots Garcia four times, stopping the attack. Total dead: Zero. -- Winnemucca, Nev., 2008: Ernesto Villagomez opens fire in a crowded restaurant; concealed carry permit-holder shoots him dead. Total dead: Two. (I'm excluding the shooters' deaths in these examples.) -- Appalachian School of Law, 2002: Crazed immigrant shoots the dean and a professor, then begins shooting students; as he goes for more ammunition, two armed students point their guns at him, allowing a third to tackle him. Total dead: Three. -- Santee, Calif., 2001: Student begins shooting his classmates -- as well as the "trained campus supervisor"; an off-duty cop who happened to be bringing his daughter to school that day points his gun at the shooter, holding him until more police arrive. Total dead: Two. -- Pearl High School, Mississippi, 1997: After shooting several people at his high school, student heads for the junior high school; assistant principal Joel Myrick retrieves a .45 pistol from his car and points it at the gunman's head, ending the murder spree. Total dead: Two. -- Edinboro, Pa., 1998: A student shoots up a junior high school dance being held at a restaurant; restaurant owner pulls out his shotgun and stops the gunman. Total dead: One. By contrast, the shootings in gun-free zones invariably result in far higher casualty figures -- Sikh temple, Oak Creek, Wis. (six dead); Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Va. (32 dead); Columbine High School, Columbine, Colo. (12 dead); Amish school, Lancaster County, Pa. (five little girls killed); public school, Craighead County, Ark. (five killed, including four little girls). All these took place in gun-free zones, resulting in lots of people getting killed -- and thereby warranting inclusion in the Mother Jones study."
-
The only "ass" the current administration has any interest in "kicking" is the ass of the American people.
-
-
-
-
-
Doesn't Jessie Jackson Jr have a CCW? You know, the former Rep who left the House due to mental illness. Does he still have his CCW?
-
Did anyone catch the Douche in Chief try to exploit the CT tragedy to get the Republicans to cave in on the fiscal cliff? Twice he mentioned the shooting and also mentioned hurricane Sandy. This a**hole would exploit the death of his own kids if it got him what he wants.
-
-
No way the Senate impeaches. Are you kidding, Reid hasn't allowed a budget vote or any other vote he doesn't want in the last 4 years. Do you really think that corrupt, anti-American piece of sh*t would allow impeachment? I said it here once before, Obama could commit murder on live tv and Reid wouldn't allow impeachment to happen.