ChrisJM981

I believe it had something to do with accusations made by an ex. 3 years of no firearms and I can't even imagine how much money spent on attorney fees.

Rosey was on Gun For Hire Radio today. He and Anthony were explaining how the NRA and ANJRPC are not going to make the call for action until the bills make it out of committee. I appreciate them letting us know what's going on, as it's been crickets from the above organizations.

Isn't the entire administrative code an interpretation of laws on the books? I thought that was the job of the judicial branch.

I see they have the donate button at the top and bottom of that page. When I see them actually make an effort I'll throw some coins in the pot.

Because it says Jerry Miculek on the side and has a 6.5" barrel instead of a 5"?

Save up a little more, get the S&W 986, and be happy.

Same for people that buy houses adjacent to rail tracks near a road crossing, then complain about the trains blowing the horn as they go through.

You'd be labeled a domestic terrorist. The public masters have learned to chip away a little at a time, and it is always in the name of "safety" to avoid revealing their true tyrannical nature.

My guess would be that as a "compromise" there will be an exception made for a handguard. The usual suspects will say, "Look, we got them to compromise!" while having their hands extended looking for a donation. I'd rather let them ban anything that allows you to position a hand other than the one firing the rifle. No carve out for the fudds.

Is it semi-auto or pump, and since it has multiple tubes does it count as more than 6 round capacity?

Of course.

I already have one of those. She hits me up every payday.

They didn't write it or even come up with it. It was given to them to introduce, otherwise all the bills would say Loretta Weinberg on them.

I'd have to find it, but I remember seeing something from either the AG or NJSP referencing the intention of the law was to prevent the firearm from being concealed, then extended for use. This *should* be within the spirit of the law. If you cannot adjust it without taking it apart, then it's not adjustable. My hesitation comes from the constructive intent law. The law itself is rather ambiguous, like any other piece of legislation the state would like to use against you.

Duran Duran?

It will only come through a lawsuit, and only if a liberal judge or 2 die with a conservative president in office.

NJSP handling building permits as well?

I put out 11 traps last night with no hits. I rebaited the traps and put them out again. If there are no hits I'll go into the crawlspace and see what I can find. I debated CCI .22lr shotshells before deciding that nothing good would come from that.

Beta mag!

A binary trigger isn't going to be much fun with 5 rd magazines...

That is what I was asking. Thanks Paul.

It wasn't a yes/no question. I'll rephrase it: Can a firearm that is not a rifle be purchased out of state?

Ummm, no. That will give me nightmares.

Allergic, so that's not happening. I remember seeing that foam. Good call. Perhaps this is a good excuse to buy a FLIR camera.