bbk

Nice, nice. Welcome to the AR family.

Eh, I wouldn't discriminate people in a time of crisis. The worst of times can bring out the bad, of course, but, and its for debate, the best as well... another one of those oddities of the human species. I just wouldn't be quick to trust neighbors who I hardly know.

Specs? What kind of muzzle device is that there?

Let alone if the shot would even be reported in some areas

Why the " :doh: "? While I'm not totally convinced about the fusing of technology and justice, this is a case where it seems that the authorities are considering/implementing the least obstructive measure. We're not talking about road-cams that the government has access to, or anything of the sort, but a proven technology (the tech is proven, not necessarily the results). From most every angle, I don't see how this effects any liberties of us citizens (who's 2A rights are often trampled on in the name of "security"). How they end up funding it is a different story, and, fortunately, I'm not from the Plainfield area.

Yep, what Caine said. I wasn't using Tula, but Wolf (tomato-'tomahto'). I'm pretty much 100% sure as I cycled through with my other magazines with no issues (not a magazine or extractor issue). I learned my lesson, and I'll spend that extra (fraction of an extra) for brass.

Hello and welcome. The avatar made me chuckle

+1. Ha, its so true. Even with that said, flares are so '90s . Its all about IR and chem lights these days.

Of course I don't know what your abilities are or your plan (nor do I want to know your plan for OPSEC's sake), but why risk trying to clear the rooms in the home? Seems like you have it best by hunkering down in your son's room with your wife, and letting any hostiles come to you. I don't mean to sound condescending or anything along those lines, I only bring it up because I wouldn't want anything preventable from happening if you were ever in a situation.

I thought the disclaimer stated that everything done was in accordance with local wildlife and game laws or whatnot-- not that wildlife wouldn't be harmed.

I think using an AR as a primary is feasible, as long as a person has the situational awareness to understand the acceptable sectors of fire. And really, its not about an AR or handgun or shotgun for HD. In a high stress situation, I would rather a person use whatever it is that they are most comfortable using (whether its through training, growing up with that specific firearm, etc). In my case, I know I can hit a man-sized target 10/10 times in a high stress situation within the probable "justified" range (factoring in NJ laws of retreat, etc) with an AR. I couldn't say the same about my abilities with a handgun or shotgun. So, having figured out my sectors of fire; figuring out at which angles (horizontal and vertical) are safe and not safe-- and having dry run it with walk through's, I'm comfortable with using an AR for HD. I would hope others would take the time to figure out what works best for them and their home. ETA: I still agree that an AR doesn't make the best first option, as I noted in my initial post.

AR15, XD40, 870 in that order. I wouldn't mind if it were the other way around though. It is in that order for the time being based on my level of training, experience, and confidence. I'm not totally comfortable with using the AR15 for HD though because of the known issues with over penetration (not so much in my own household, but loose liabilities hitting neighbors). For me, it would be best to have my handgun as my primary HD. Well-placed shots will get the job done, and the muzzle flash/sound won't affect me as much (which would only be amplified considering its indoors). Anybody who has had the opportunity to shoot at night and/or shoot without ear pro knows what I'm talking about.

I believe the shelf-life is around 10-12 years. Regardless, ACOGs are built like a tank and can take a hell of a beating (I know this from the field). The fiber optics and tritium are only used to illuminate the reticle, and the ACOG will still work even if the tritium and fiber optics lose their illumination capabilities. I wouldn't recommend an ACOG for casual use, but I also know better then to judge how a person spends their money. With that said, a person who's "mission orientation" means they'll be using their rifle day-in-day-out in situations where they need a bit more range, then sure it makes perfect sense. Otherwise, its something to think about twice IMHO. And a battery backup for ACOGs? I guess you might be taking about the micro-dot systems that can be attached, but no ACOG model uses any type of battery. ACOGs only utilize either tritium or tritium and fiber optics.

Just watched the night cap. Man, it really shows how people will always revert back to their "training." Training in this context isn't just about what can be learned from a course necessarily-- but life itself. Unless there are some secrets yet to be untold, the composition of the group seems way too heavy in certain specializations... which goes back to how people always revert back to what they've been "trained" to do in situations. Water and fire was done pretty well. As for shelter, I couldn't really say since we didn't really see the other facilities in depth (though they could probably tear down the white tent [see] and utilize those materials). Food seemed to not be rationed that well, but, again, judgment is reserved until we see them reach that brink. And security, omg... fail. They failed to S&S (surveillance and secure) the perimeter as a whole (and document the layout/structures/landmarks-- even if it were a rough sand table). They failed to secure the entry into the camp (could have closed off the chained gate, which would at least be somewhat of a deterrent). Failed to secure their main housing facility (used the one-board method to barricade the front door which would have at least acted as a deterrent). Didn't utilize their numbers in confrontations (got dispersed and picked off). And didn't utilize the buddy system well (why would they need to send four or five people to get salvage a battery and some rotting bacon?). They haven't even recon'ed the other facilities (though, that's from the perspective of the audience, as they might have). Good thing its episode no. 1, and they have a whole season to salvage that a--hattery. I wonder how far the studio will allow physical confrontations to go. Simunitions would be cool, but that would mean everybody would have to wear eye and ear pro everywhere, and that would look silly ETA: They didn't dig their morning trenches either. I'm sure this will be addressed pretty quickly though when they find out how crappy it can get

Doh, I need to remember that before I go on my copy/paste bonanzas Its all good, we need to be able to dream

Most of my experiences were with EOTechs, but I wasn't all that thrilled when I bought one for personal use. A bit cluttered IMHO, though with NVG-use I prefer the EOTech. I switched over to the Aimpoint H-1, and while it took me some time, I highly prefer it. The housing seems to disappear into the FOV, making target acquisition quite easy (and its very, very light).

The past two events have been HIS specialties, and both performances were very underwhelming . I'm not one to criticize too much because I probably couldn't do what he can; but still, there's a point where a person has to be accountable (considering he didn't go to the elimination round either time).

I'm with the other minimalists. I respect the collector's out there, as I find the history of things quite fascinating. However, when I think 'investment,' like others, its not so much a financial thing-- but a tool in the toolbox of life. Not that I will probably ever really need to use a firearm in an aggressive manner again, but to have that ability and know-how, to me, is vital if the need ever arises. As for ammunition and range fees, and the sorts, I don't feel bad about these things (as long as I've done my homework and am not getting ripped off). Marksmanship is a perishable skill, and, especially in the civilian world, I need to be stringent about said skills as I am accountable for my actions. ETA: While a minimalists in terms of how many I own, I also do believe that there is no price tag on my safety and my family's safety. I'm on a budget already, so, I'm always looking for the best deal and agree with djg that price doesn't always equal quality. But I don't have issues with spending a bit more if I know what I'm getting is proven and won't let me down.

Should be interesting once they make it every person for them self. Confidence course + shooting looks really promising... something I wish they would've done sooner. I figured that was going to be their initial approach (with the first episode making them run/crawl around), not that a lot of the challenges haven't been pretty cool in their own right.

AR15 platforms w/ mil spec triggers. As for pistols... well, I need more time to draw that conclusion :shifty:

I have a little half-sister (huge age gap), and she's getting to that age where she just blurts out whatever is on her mind-- pretty funny times. As for my grandmother, bless her that I still have her around. She's lived through pre-western Orient, the introduction to the spheres of influence (and some of its pitfalls), imperialist Japan, WWII, Korean War (where she witnessed her husband [my grandfather] be treated as a POW by the Japs, and then US-- who ultimately made him one of their interpreters and gave him some medal for his troubles ), rebuilding of that nation, and then the past few decades. She has her tricks.

Hello and welcome! Looking forward to ordering a few things down the road.

The weight issue has been remedied by a lot of other means. Combat loads use to be 100-150lbs+, but because of recent technology innovations, the combat load has dropped to as low as 70. Even though SOPs differ from command to command, it use to be anywhere from 240-300 rounds for a rifleman. These days, and currently from what my buds have told me, the load has been reduced to as low as 120 (these numbers are not exact as most everything is mission-specific). So, weight hasn't been a huge issue for boots on the ground. Maybe its an issue to the brass who see these figures on paper who, in turn, bring it up at briefs, who convince the government committees to put out contracts. But for boots on the ground, I'll take lethality over excessive weight (because that's what it would end up being). Give me a SCAR 17 (7.62 NATO ver.) with 120 rounds instead of an M4/M16/Mk18 with 400 rounds.

Very nice. I'm not in the field anymore, nor was I ever a SAW gunner, so I never had to deal with crazy combat loads (SOPs on combat loads vary from CO to CO). Because of that, I would still take lethality over weight in the current operations.

My apologies for my misstatement, as I wasn't trying to sound sarcastic. My comment just refers to the fact that the audience doesn't really know the premise that led up to the situation... and while its a win for the good guys (from what can be taken from the short clip), seeing people buy the farm is always a bit unsettling for me personally :oops: . Wasn't trying to offend or say anymore then that in my initial post.