MidwestPX

Chiming in about mag compatibility but I wouldn't expect Gen 2 mags to drop free. M3s and EMAGs should though.

The following dealers will be receiving inventory: Bob's Little Sport Shop in Glassboro Cheyenne Mountain Outfitters in Robbinsville Efinger's in Bound Brook Hackettstown Guns & Ammo in Hackettstown J G Firearms in Middlesex Luciano's Sport Shop in Lodi Monmouth Arms in Morganville Ottomanelli's Sporting Arms in Woodland Park RTSP in Randolph

But still 100% compatible with the AR/M4/M16 family of guns. They're also slicksided and windowed.

Yeah, out of curiosity, I took a look at the two latest shipments of EMAGs and Gen 2 PMAGs. The EMAGs cost me 82% more than the PMAGs did yet my margin on them is lower. Cest la vie.

Price hasn't changed in two years when the cost of materials went up. Right now, I'm absorbing the cost increase of the injection molded block and taking that out of my margin and evaluating if another increase is necessary. You may also be confusing these with PMAGs which don't cost me as much to make and have a lower price where the Gen2s are $20 and the M3s are $22.

I checked the logs and the one name I see with repeated failed transactions with two different cards is returning the same error. Billing zip code match only, street address isn't matching.

EMAGs are now live.

Not for awhile. Backorders to dealer are being filled first and they've got ALOT of mags ordered.

A little under an hour to go! I'll also announce a product change that I think most folks will be happy about.

Yes. Turnaround depends on what's going on when they get here but typically within three business days. $10ea See here for more info: http://midwestpx.com/product_info.php?cPath=15_81&products_id=364

I checked my dictionary and there was Carney's picture, defining the word, "Tool"

http://midwestpx.com/product_info.php?cPath=15_79&products_id=507 Can't say I didn't give advance notice

Complete lower is treated the same as stripped as far as the 4473 goes. Without a barreled upper attached to the lower, it's considered "Other" regardless of how many parts are installed in the lower.

A huge shipment of LPKs probably next week. NiB BCGs, at the rate they're selling, will be gone before the night is out.

Got alot of irons in the fire atm, remind me again which one you proposed was? The BCG is the heart of your rifle. It does all the work. Many failures/stoppages with this platform can be traced directly to a bad BCG. Either of these would be an upgrade over a stock Bushmaster BCG as the bolts are made of a better steel and they're individually MPI tested (I believe BMs are batch).

Nickel boron are HERE Phosphated are HERE

Sounds like I need to charge more...

Here's the issue with using just Magpul's limiter. You can take a saw to it and bam, "large" capacity magazine. You don't need a separate lockplate to run afoul of the law. So the limiter on it's own is not a permanent modification therefore, the manufacturer must deny access to it through a permanent method. That's why the baseplate is so difficult to remove however as I see these kinds of threads pop up with increased frequency, in the interest of protecting a customer from inadvertently making themselves a felon, I've made significant (thousands of dollars) capital investments to further enhance the permanence of modification.

If you want to clean the mags (which I've never had to do even though I run my guns suppressed and break mags before they need cleaning), grab two basins of water and add soap to one. Dunk the mag in the soapy water, depress the follower and swish it around. Flip it upside down with the follower depressed to drain. Repeat in the clean water. Squirt some CLP if you feel the need for the spring even though it's a stainless steel spring. Whatever was small enough to get in there will come out using this method. However, as I said, it's highly unnecessary since both the follower and the magazine body include a Teflon additive that makes them self-lubricating.

Dropping Magpul's limiter into a magazine and using it in NJ would be a bad idea. On it's own, I don't think it meets the criteria to be legal.

*sigh* It's threads like these that are forcing higher cost alternatives for sealing magazines. The pin is just one method of sealing. There is a secondary method that is tougher to beat. The pin serves as a visual indicator of modification. It will be going away in the next few weeks as a new method of sealing is instituted. Do not attempt to disassemble your magazines. You void the warranty and also risk making yourself a felon.

No, these have not been released to anyone yet.

There may be some new limited cap mag models in the works now that I've made an investment in some new tools. What stopped me with alot of designs was being able to cost-effectively seal magazines. More on this later when I announce the design improvements.

I'll announce it here when direct retail sales are being accepted once again. A shipment of mags went to Bullseye and Efingers for those who don't want to wait.