siderman

I believe G&S Hunters in Paterson does bluing and blasting but but I have no experience with them or their work.

Saw nothing here but an honest exchange of info untill your wiseass remark.

Seriously, that's it? No paperwork of the transaction?

So what paperwork does the seller actually leave with?

I have to agree here. Wife does too and that matters more! 3 mins away, often on sale, sometimes free Coke, grab some slaw and gtg.

Admins! ban this poo poo head, he called me a mean name!

I'm not going to go back and forth on this but just that I see it as....11+ mags are NOW classified as hi cap under the NEW law and thus restricted from travel under the OLD law because they ARE hi caps. I wish the new law's grandfathering expanded the possession part but there's the confusion. At least how I see it. You see it different, ok do whatever. I don't think anyone's going to jail over this but I prefer to avoid the potential hassle over a fun trip to the range.

Guys, its not Nappens interpretation. The confusion is that there is already a existing law banning hi cap mags (formerly 16+) and a default of that law is no traveling with hi cap mags- which 11+ mags now are. But we are allowed to possess our 11+ until Dec 10....choose your option.......

Cold turkey. That and what worked for me also was becoming a homebound hermit for a month or so. No going out with the guys, partys, even bars and restaurants (back then you could still smoke in 'em...and get cigs out of the machine in Pathmark for 80 cents lol). Its a mind game and you have to really want it, to me the all the substitutes is slow torture. And think how much money you'll save. Seriously- add it up and use that as an incentive to reward yourself with a prize down the road. Good luck!

Van Drews so called positive 2A view is USELESS, I don't care how sincere he seems about it, he is a willing and active part of the democrat machine in NJ and should be despised as such if you cherish the 2A.

That's a pretty lame ass cover their ass unspecified notification. It's always been illegal to bring anything illegal anywhere lol.

Afaik this is the first time they have bought a lawsuit against the state. Not much to brag about there. Pathetic actually....But they've been pretty successful on the local levels, Operation Strikeforce for example which went after towns requiring extra pprwrk and other un-required docs to obtain fpid's and pistol permits. This is just my opinion but I don't believe ANJRPC was ever meant to be a staunch fighter for 2A rights but more a Chamber of Commerce type entity for the shooting sports. Was most likely run by fudds most of its existance and is reluctantly just recently stepping into the real world of the 2A but unfortunately too late for NJ. In a state that has little if any gun culture, heavy on the lib agenda and stuck inside a judiciary that is a product of those aspects it's a wonder anything gets done. I can't realistically expect any 2A success until we get national/scotus attention. ANJRPC is our biggest, wealthiest, most organized group and best hope, such as it is.

What am I wrong about? I implied the judges bias, NJ legislators have already stated its interest in imposing the no semi and 5 rd laws or is it the being nervous part? I agree about the overturns and am looking forward to them but until then NJ will do as it pleases in its normal contemptuous manner. And we will go on asking do we keep, sell, hide, ship out of state etc until each and every anti law claws its way up the judicial system.

Ya know, I used to not worry too much about going to 5 rds and banning semi auto because of the common use protection thing. But after seeing the judges brief outright admitting that yes the 15 reds are in common use then going out of his way to blab on with a bunch of legalize to justify that the state can ignore that protection because NJ knows better has me nervous. I can actually see them trying that shit now knowing the judiciary has their back.

from bankruptcy to burgers lol.

Thanx for helping to explain this mess. Bonus points to NJ for dbl dicking us.

So is it that a nics check triggers a mandated log in?

Ok fair enough, time is money and thus a fee. But what about the logging the gun into the books part, why? Is it required by law?

Help me understand something, maybe it's obvious but ......I get that private sales now need a nics and thus the visit to a ffl. But why does the gun need to be logged in a charged a transfer fee? Is that part of the new law? Why can't the buyer/ seller just do coe's, ffl runs nics and that's that?

Agreed. This new law is about making buyers go thru nics. We shouldn't have to do a ffl log in, just buyer/seller exchange coe's, ffl runs nics and gets his fee, nics # goes on coe- after approval done.

You just answered your own question. The indoctrination over the yrs is now bearing fruits. Give the sheeple what they've been taught to want.

this scenaro offers no proof of legal sale for the seller. seller surely needs a coe no? or does the ffl offer seller an other receipt?

Whenever this Bob V issue pops up I like to point out that he co-chairs the Legislative Action committee with Scott Bach (executive director) for ANJRPC, a very odd pairing imo.

IT SHOULD END RIGHT THERE!!! CASE OVER!!! its like Comey playing out the case for Hillary and concluding the complete opposite of the facts just stated! So tired of these liberal democrat wipped judges setting/legislating policy.

You just want to see his big toe.