JackDaWack

DMV hasn't issues stickers since at least 2016 when i moved. I had to get a new license with my new address updated. My PD, who never gives me issues with permits, said they couldn't process the application without it being updated. I'm not sure how this works with FARS now, since you don't physically show your ID. However, without that sticker anymore, the PD also told me you could recieve a traffic citation if the ID doesn't show your new address within a short period of time from moving if you were to get pulled over. I would advise just getting a new license to avoid any issues.

Anywhere taking longer than 30 days Is bullshit, my town without FARS took around 3 weeks. My last set of permits using FARS took.... 6 days...

The judge ruled on FPID applications, not carry. So it does not apply. The judge absolved them from the 30 day rule. The main difference here is the law stipulates an automatic approval, FPID apps dont have that, so there is no recourse for the cops taking longer than the law stipulates. I would have a hard time thinking a judge can overrule this now, the SCOTUS opinion stated they can't take too long to process applications.

Where is this?

I would take what ever beretta is offering, but here's the deal. Every 92 I own wears around that location. It looks like you have a visible burr in there, which should be sorted out, and obviously the cause of the premature wear. However, even a new barrel with the burr removed will eventually wear all the same unfortunately. It's a metal on metal part, so the finish can only wear over time. My m9a1 with no tooling in that location, no burrs or marks has about the same wear at 1500rounds, although at the 10oclock position.

There are only two types of Doctors that can evaluate you, a Dr. of Psychology (not an MD) or a Dr. of Psychiatry (MD). Giving an either/or makes no sense then saying they must hold an MD. Both are accredited Doctors board certified to evaluate your mental health. Expect to pay upwards of $400-500 for an initial eval, and about $300 for a couple follow up sessions. All in, probably about $1500 or more when your done. I wouldn't be surprised if the evaluating Dr. Requested all your prior mental health info, including notes from prior evals.

I'm scheduled for the end of July, waiting on a handgun and want to shoot a little before the qual. I'm curious if after you apply, can you simply qualify with another handgun without reapplying for the permit itself?

This isn't the NRA CCW course, but in comparison, the NRA basics class is over 4 hours long and costs the same. Not sure how long the CCW course is. All I know is, my wish list for gifts has now become gift certificates to GFH lol

According to who? We are not held to the RPO, LEO and armed security standards. No where in the licensing requirements does it state such.

Like I said, I have no issues paying for something that resembles the HCQ with minor differences, but retains the primary course of fire. I wouldnt take anything less than that. Keep in mind, NJ could pass a law that requires more training prior to anyone being approved, and they would have to start all over again. A lot of unknowns right now.

I'm not arguing for/against training. Just that the margin at these prices is significant. A multi hour course, with direct instruction of increased value doesn't cost much more. I do expect prices to come down once competition sees an opportunity. A smaller one man operation could do this for half the price. ???? No one knows.

The GFH course is 200 bucks for two handguns, right off the bat for a 30 minute range session, that includes little to no actually training I found it to be rather expensive. Ya know what though, I have no issues giving Ant my money, they guy has been fighting this fight since I met him back in 2010. The price will come down when more courses are available from others. Right now, I'm not keen on shopping around not knowing if the course will be accepted by the State. You need to recertify ever 2 years,, within 6 months of filing a new application. I think you will see an injunction in the next week over all of this.

GFH course of fire represents the HQC, and scoring method. Not sure what RTSP does but I would be worry of anything less than the standard string of shots from the HQC.

There are multiple options according to the statute, HQC is just one.

Dates are now posted through the end of July, thanks Ant!

I believe GFH, being approved by the state prior to all of this, should have the necessary approval info for people passing their qualifying class.

There are no formative "tests" established in the opinion, unfortunately. What you're seeing is general criteria outlined in the opinion. There is nothing as specific such as the "lemon test" which specifies exactly what must be considered in order for a law to be constitutional. The restrictions you note, are for the outright denial of the right. In fact, the licensing requirements in NY which also requires registering the firearm to be carried was left in place. I'm not disagreeing with you sentiments, it's ridiculous. NJ will argue every one has the right carry a firearm who isn't prohibited, and can do so with the firearm of their choosing after completing the "objective" licensing requirements.

No offense, but is this the first SCOTUS opinion you've dug into? The scope of Judicial review is a very deliberate thing... to suggest they/he left things out due to a heavy work load is not even seriously considered. Remanding to the lower courts is a pass off for now, again they decided not to hear the cases, when they could have and given a direct opinion Seperate of Bruen. If lower courts reverse, that's only good news for the circuit it happens in. NJ doesn't need to use it as a registry, they literally already have one. If you can't afford multiple firearms? How is this even an issue now?

Good news all around, maybe SCOTUS spared the libs feelings temporarily in light of their current asswhooping. The lower courts were wrong the first time around without Bruen and I think this is the courts way of saying get your shit together before we do it for you.

If the lower court doesn't change its opinion, it could be another 2 years before SCOTUS hears it again.

I'm gonna wait for a more formative write up, but it seems the opinion is incredibly narrow in scope to administrative rules.

So what are we looking at here, these are headed to conference.. will an opinion be rendered? Or are they being remanded back to the lower courts? With the session poised to close, I don't expect an opinion being published, and I don't see the lower courts shifting their ruling based on Bruen.

Good. In past times, that may have been a problem. There sems to be some form of accountability these days with their attitude of not caring.

Under NJ state constition: "All persons are by nature free and independent, and have certain natural and unalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and of pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness." in conjunction with NJ state law, I view the issue as follows. You can't be the initial aggressor, clearly the person breaking into your home is. You have a right to forcefully remove the person from your property(dwelling)to protect it, and obtain safety. If that individual then shows a willingness and ability to harm you, self defense is warranted. This idea you have to sit and watch someone ransacked your home while the police make their way to you is nonsense. NJ is going to have one hell of time justifying duty to retreat with that paragraph being the first one in the NJ State Constitution, or at the very least an individual using force to protect their property.

Ant, How often will dates be updated on the GFH site? I'm gonna be looking for a date sometime the last week of July as I'm stuck with family obligations until then, and using the mean time to pick up an additonal handgun to qualify with. Is there an option to call to set up a later date? Or just wait until the site publishes those dates?