Soju

NJ also has other laws in place to restrict/allow things. What makes you think the state will actually follow them though? If I'm not mistaken, there is at least one law suit against them because they aren't following the laws...and it still hasn't changed much...

Can someone show the statute where it says you have to pay $18 dollars for this?

If you actually bother to watch the video, it is obvious that there wasn't really a terrorist in the street going to blow up stuff with an RPG. It was very obviously a joke of some sorts, or at the very least, not real. It was however pretty dumb. Arrests were only made after the video went up on youtube for all to see, included with negative comments directed toward the police. If I had to guess, that is why there were arrests. You people calling to crucify him, or more particularly the kid, for being stupid...that is ridiculous. I suppose when I was a kid and made movies with my friends dressed in camo with realistic looking airsoft and bb guns, we probably should have been arrested too right?

It's called a photograph IIRC.

There isn't one. That was exactly my point earlier.

Again, another bill trying to ban the possession of something. Ridiculous! How about you make it illegal to shine it at peoples faces, and illegal to lase aircraft with it. No...can't do that. We all know there are NO legitimate uses for lasers, ever. Lets just ban them all. Sigh. And Atlantic City. I've been lazed a few times flying around Jersey. It is annoying, can be dangerous (depending on the power of the laser), and stupid. Even yet, I still don't wish them to be illegal.

Yes! It serves no benefit (except financial to certain people...) to prosecute people for doing things where both no harm was caused, and with no intent of wrongdoing. By either pulling the trigger, or have no idea how to operate the firearm. In either case, it is pretty clear he shouldn't have been handling the firearm. In fact, by negligently discharging a firearm, the officer committed a bigger mistake than the gun owner.

The irony is, this has no effect on the "anti's" because as he stated, the only way to get people to do something is through force or reason. They can't be reasoned, so your only option is force. It makes it hard to use force when you don't have guns! And that is their argument to begin with... That of course, is recognized by the author. It is also recognized by the state/government. So they will continue to use force against us to get their way, by preventing us from being able to use force back! And with only the two options, which trumps which? Of course that is also obvious. Force trumps reason. So using reason as a way to promote firearms will never work!

BLF says your argument is invalid, so that must be true! Yes you are. Oh great, a perfect solution! Because we all know you can arm yourself in NJ legally? Oh wait, only people like you, can? Hmm.... Yep, and you can carry a gun. So your argument is invalid. And because I said it is invalid, that is all the justification I need.... Totally different indeed. We all know rape is much worse then murder/death. No one deserves to be raped, but people deserve to be murdered. Got it. Obviously not too upset. I guess you can be upset but not feel bad at the same time?

I can only imagine your reaction if a cop was killed in a bad neighborhood and someone said "You know it's a bad neighborhood, yet you choose to work their...I don't feel bad for you."

Have you put it back down yet, or are you still holding it?

http://news.yahoo.com/houston-officer-kills-double-amputee-wheelchair-222540280.html I sure hope there is more to this story. Anybody who is incapable of figuring out a way to avoid a one armed, one legged man, in a wheelchair with a pen, is likely not capable of much of anything. I really hope it turns out the man shot was actually a Jedi and could move using only the power of his mind, and the pen was actually a light saber that wasn't powered up yet.

Haha so true! High speed go-karts and beer! Yep, done that a time or too. I don't see the big deal about this. Sounds like they have a system to keep people from drinking and then shooting, so you aren't going to be worrying about a drunk guy in the stall next to you. So what is the issue? It is like saying because someone owns guns, they can't have alcohol in their home, or else they end up shooting people. Or as was mentioned, states that allow CCing in bars end with bad things all the time. They don't.

Nobody commented on it being an oddball inquiry here...just a few weeks ago... http://njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/topic/38699-80-lowers

What purpose would it serve for a prohibited person to ask about the legality of something if regardless of it, it would be illegal for him? Since when did asking about the legality of something mean someone is suspicious or has bad intentions? How come it is fishy for some to specifically look for and ask about information in order to FOLLOW the law? Why should someone "just get an FID" when they fundamentally disagree with doing so?

Probably not the type of status you guys are talking about though.

I've read about this happening a number of times. Each time equally as ridiculous. I say this a lot, and it is almost ironic that I say it ironically. The only thing that offends me is when people get offended. You do NOT have the right to be offended. That is ridiculous! "Hey, you can't have an American Flag (Confederate flag, basketball hoop, children's painting, cross, purple unicorn statue, etc) there because I might look at it and I hate America (Confederacy, basketball, kids, religion, the color purple/mythical creatures, etc)!" Well I hate you so you can't live where I might see you! Oh...but that doesn't work, and is different? The pussification of America continues. As a counter, I like what this guy did when he was told he couldn't have an American flag. Suck on that HOA's!

American Flag Nearly Dies After Inhaling Fumes Of Burning Protesters | The Duffel Blog I saw this posted on the same topic on another forum. Hilarious if you ask me!

Abuse of authority. Standard ops.

Criminalizing the possession of anything is stupid and pointless. Why stop at just ammunition? ...

After posting, I picked up on the longer sight radius. That certainly makes sense, particularly for those who are not using optics/using fixed sights. I kind of feel dumb for not realizing that when I posted originally.

No plane flies well for long after losing half its engines. However they can keep flying to an extent. On the other hand, no plane flies at all after losing all engines. Depending on the plane and weight, some can glide reasonably well. A lawn dart on the other hand, like an F-16...not so much.

Am I the only one that hates the look of full length rails (that go all the way past where a front sight post would be up to almost the end of the barrel/start of the muzzle break)? It looks both clumsy and heavy. Also, what extra function does it have? I'm assuming it serves some purpose I'm not thinking of. I suppose if you have super long monkey arms it would be a big help. With that said, all these photos are making me want to build another AR. Damn you all and your sexy rifle photos!

+1 to you my good friend. It is the person that garners the respect. The profession should have little to do with it.