Dan

Wow, I just checked out MSAR's new site. I thought they were down under forever. Seems they are making a comeback. Great news being an STG-556 owner. Sorry I don't have the E4. Just a note, the FN FS2K is 5.56. No ammo problems. Bob, I think you are thinking of the P90 using the 5.7x28 round. The FS2K is affectionately known as the "tactical tuna" from its shape.

This is what they are trying to do here. They are going after people "amassing stockpiles" and "arsenals" of guns. "why do you need that many guns and bullets" they say. The government is going to audit licensed gun owners to see if they have too many guns. They mentioned something about the law only allowing 50 guns for a licensed gun owner. Scary crap, especially since this is what the media is trying to portray here whenever they talk about a gun owner who broke no laws having an "arsenal" and "why would he/she need that many guns" , alluding that they are just a potential murderer.

I think that gun control laws have more sinister roots, especially how they are written here in our fine state. Lets face it, most NJ gun owners have at one time or another broken a anti-gun law and are all potential felons. The government machine has spent the past 100 years piling on law upon law from taxes to guns , so that they , at any moment, can arrest any person they want to and send them to jail. The idea is to have so many complex and convoluted laws that nearly everyone alive is living in a perpetual state of having breaking or broken some kind of law. Now you get on the govt's radar, and they simply have to 'find' the evidence and send you to jail. Its easy for them to make gun control laws written in such a way that you are guilty unless proven innocent, and tag on extremely harsh sentences. They can do with with standing applause in many cases because of all of the folks living in this country that blame society's violence problems on in-adamant objects.

I agree, bashing of any kind should stop. I also agree that folks should be able to start a discussion around topics that they are interested in or concerned about as long as it adheres to the forum's policies and etiquette guidelines (no foul language, no ad hominems, no malicious stereotyping, racial comments, name calling, obvious trolling, etc, the list goes on). The topic of law enforcement misconduct and abuse of power is just as serious as political misconduct and abuse of power and should not be silenced outright just as we do not silence political discussions as long as they follow the rules. I'm pretty sure that is what the basis of this thread is from my observations.

I've been using www.phonepower.com for 5 years now. Even my fax and alarm system both work through it with no problems. Lots of great features, like cloned line in which you can have two active phones in the house both sharing the same single number. It means two people can talk to two different people at the same time, included in the service. Great international rates that my wife uses to call Brazil a lot. Beats those scratch off phone cards.

#1 way to avoid tickets is using your brain. I'm always on the lookout. I don't go nuts, but 80 in 65 is pretty normal. Its when all of a sudden you are in a 55 area on the highway and not realize and you are still doing 80 that can get you in some hot water. Know the spots where they like to hide, scan rearview mirror often, observe car behavior in front of you, like lots of brake lights out of the blue for no reason. To me the detector is there to enhance the brain, to give that additional cue, or in many cases confirm the suspicion that you have while you are already slowing down. Occasionally it has saved the arse when the brain might be taking a break as well. Only 2 times I've gotten nabbed in the past 10 years was LIDAR. It is very difficult for even the best detectors to alert you quick enough to slow down. The cop would have to be lazing a car pretty close to you in order for your detector to pick up the scatter. If they shoot you first, no detector will save you. Only an active jammer may give you a chance, and that game is a battle of technology which each side continues to up the ante on. Good thing is with LIDAR they need LOS, so if you are scanning the horizon properly , almost always you can see the cop's car before you come into a clear shot for them. Its when you are not paying attention is when the risk goes up tremendously.

I have two Beltronics for many years, both serve me very well. I don't go nuts at all, but I like to know when the po-po are around. At least you know its a bad time to pass.

I don't see why you can't legally have it as long as the stock is fixed/pinned and brake pinned. It's up to the nj dealer if they are willing to perform alterations and sell it.

The understanding is, and what NJ gun shops follow as a rule, that if the gun has one of the banned names stamped on it like (Avtomat Kalashnikov) on the receiver, its a no-go. The AG has even deemed if it has the abbreviation "AK" on it, it may be fair game open for prosecution from the named list, but this is a gray area and does not have any case law behind it. The AG in the past has issued a warning to a NJ dealer for selling SA rifles that had "AK" in the model number, and had asked them to issue a recall to their customers for a refund. It comes down to who wants to be the first person to be the test case in this scenario, along with many of our idiotic laws. For any semi auto rifle that doesn't have a specific name on the list stamped on it, then you have to follow the evil feature list game to determine if the rifle is "substantially identical" or a "type" of SA rifle on the banned list. Easy as pie

North and South doesn't work. This is the real map of NJ :

Just wow. How dare she say that we don't care about bad guys. That's such a blatant lie like Obama's 90% BS. I'm infuriated. Their logic... "If you care about bad guys not getting guns, we have to take yours away first". In other words, they view all gun owners as "the bad guys". Add to that, it is apparent that using logic and reason with them is pointless.

I'd look at the .260 remington out of a 24-26" barrel (needed for optimal velocity for this round). It is said that it can replicate the trajectory of the 300 Winmag. Good article here http://demigodllc.com/articles/the-case-for-260-remington/?p=2

Correct, forgot to list that. We would not use the central A/C. Heat works fine though.

I did nearly the exact same thing as the OP. Piped NG off my main line to a lockable valve outside. Connects to my converted tri-fuel Subaru 5.2KW (US Carb kit) portable Gen via a 20Ft 3/4 rubber gas hose and quick-disconnects. 30 amp gen cord to outlet on the side of the house, backfeeding my panel via a 30am breaker and interlock kit. I have a whole home power meter by Current Cost. My entire house rarely gets above 2KW at any one time, unless we turn on the electric clothes dryer or oven (both of which we would not use during an outage). Those are really the only sacrifices we would have to make when running off of the gen.

Doesn't matter what they say on the side of the mag. If they can fit more then 15 rounds and feed them into a SA gun, it violates the law. Technically would apply to rounds the mag was not even intended or designed to use. Makes sense, otherwise mag companies could use creative labeling to get around the law, as in 5.56 shooters buying 10 round "458 socom" mags. If someone would make a .458 socom mag that was incapable of feeding 5.56, that would do it!

Tis the season to buy new toys. Out with the old, in with the new. That's the way I see it.

This senseless gun crime can be reduced by adding additional layers of bureaucracy on our current FID process, maybe something like incorporating FID's into driver's licenses. Yea that will do it, yea...

I agree, although it is important that many folks speaking mentioned 2A and inalienable rights, many legislators honestly believe that they are operating within regulatory boundaries that would stand up to 2A scrutiny. That debate won't be settled until SCOTUS rules that 2A extends beyond the home, and provides some type of litmus test that Federal and State governments are to use when looking to enact new laws that affect R2KBA. It seemed that specific suggestions on how to change the proposed bills were welcomed, and that any argument against passing one of the bills on the grounds of 2A were ignored. Example is the terrorist/no-fly list bill, where it seemed they were actually concerned about it lacking proper due process.

Whenever a pro starts off by saying negative stuff about politicians, they retaliate by screwing with then next few pro gun rights speakers.

Anti just argued that giving up liberty and rights for a little more safety is the way it is supposed to be. This was some professor. Ugh

Seems to mostly more "mature" looking white women, some with their husbands in tow. We're I'm sitting that is what it appears to be. Also seems to be disproportionately women in education, which makes sense with all the arrested children for drawing or saying the word gun as of late.

I'm sitting in room 6 in an area surrounded by antis, not sure how I will make it through the day.

Would appreciate more details. Like did they test the blood at the crime scene for a DNA match? Was he apprehended while in posession of the stolen guns? One would think he didn't have the guns on him any longer and the State couldn't prove he was the one that stole them (as in if there were multiple actors).

Are you kidding me with 364 days? They didn't nab him on illegal possession charges, as they would one of us if we happened to stray off of the most direct path directly to and from a range or gunsmith with a HG? Something tells me this guy doesn't have a FID, and wasn't on his way to the range with the stolen guns for some practice...

We could be up for yet another fight here in NJ. A company is looking to produce a for-retail sale "smart gun" or add-on product that is activated by reading a fingerprint. Implications in NJ could be severe being we already have laws on the books pertaining to this technology. http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9238728/Smart_gun_company_aims_to_begin_production_soon Fortunately, the way the law is written it does seem that a gun would have to be sold with this product built in, and would not cover retro-fit or aftermarket add-on technology.