Old Glock guy

Exactly! Don't be silly. That only applies to their subjects, namely us.

Seems like lately we're always just one election away from losing our Constitutionally guaranteed rights. And with the constant influx of millions of Third World voters who consistently vote Democratic, complete and permanent rule by Democrats seems inevitable.

They are getting pretty close to saying that incidents like this are why we should ban all firearms.

Nice family owned business up there. They are wildly busy on the weekends, but a lot quieter during the week. If you do go on a weekend, be sure to get up there in the morning.

I saw that same piece in the Bergen Record. They did say that while there are no specific criminal penalties for false accusations, the complaint would have to be filed under oath, so a false complaint could be subject to prosecution under that provision. I think Red Flag laws have the potential to be helpful, but they would need to be very clearly defined and closely regulated to prevent abuse. What happens if a man alleges that his wife or girlfriend threatened him, and has her guns removed. At that point, she would be helpless to defend herself against him. I'm curious why the scenario always presented is the reverse of that.

So do I understand correctly that one would need to replace the standard stock to make it NJ legal?

So it runs OK with steel cased ammo?

I was shooting for awhile before I tried clays, and I love it! So much fun to shoot shotguns at moving targets that explode when you hit them! You're going to love it. You don't even have to rent guns there. When you buy ammo from them, they lend you the guns. Start with the practice trap. Their pullers will coach you and have you breaking them in no time.

Same here, most recently it was just six or so months ago.

Just sent them a note. Sam, the owner, promptly replied, and told me I could take a photo of my FID along side my DL with my phone and email it to them. Even this technologically challenged old guy was capable of that. A little while later, he informed me that I was good to go, and my order went through without a hitch. Very nice example of good customer service.

Interesting that you ask, because I went to place an order a couple of days ago, and they asked for that. I've ordered from them in the past, but I can't recall if I've ever had to enter that info. Plus, my order was for shotgun ammo, which should not require that. They maintain a phone-less office (per their website), so I just sent them a note. See my post above about fewer and fewer companies wanting to deal with the BS involved in shipping to NJ.

What do they want, universal background checks? Red flag laws?

I predict the next thing we'll be hearing is that civilians should not have more firepower than police, if that hasn't been said already.

I may just have to drop by her office in Parsippany (with an appointment, of course) and politely ask her about that. I'll be sure to report back here.

So proud of my congresswoman! Even though she was in the military, she doesn't know the difference between an AR-15 or a civilian AK 47 and a "weapon of war." She has to be smart enough to realize that an AWB won't end mass shootings, so her end game must be the same as all the rest of the Dems, a complete end to private ownership of firearms. https://www.northjersey.com/story/opinion/2019/08/12/shooting-rampages-assault-weapons-ban-needed-el-paso-dayton-column/1968143001/

"Guns bad, Orange Man bad." I believe that's how the refrain goes.

I agree with you that most of mainstream America is conservative, but I believe the problem is that the Dems have brought in 30 million needy immigrants from Third World countries to drown out our voices and keep them in power. Many experts believe that Trump is the last Republican president we will ever see, for exactly that reason. (Cheery thought, I know.)

The 9 pellet 00 is fine as well. Look for "Flight control" LE13200 is all of that, plus low recoil. Thread over!

New Jersey has been a model of success for people who hate the Second Amendment. As they have made it more difficult to obtain firearms, they have decreased the number of gun owners, thereby making it harder for 2A defenders to have any voice in state government so that they can continue to push through ever more restrictive laws with the ultimate objective of eliminating the private ownership of firearms

So one judge doesn't like guns and gun owners, and that's the end of it?

I believe those are covered under The Right to Bare Arms. (Yes, it really took me over a month to come up with that.)

Absolutely! I was thinking of "dating" as a euphemism for something more, but not sure I expressed that clearly.

"Dating" Heh, heh, heh. I was thinking almost the same thing.

Don't know if everyone saw the article about how the US "shot down" an Iranian drone that was threatening a U.S. Navy ship. In reality, the drone was not literally shot. Its frequency was jammed causing it to crash. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-says-u-s-navy-ship-shot-down-iranian-drone-n1031451 Does anyone doubt for a minute that bad actors, including the government, would use similar technology to disable smart guns when they wanted to? Forget the expense, forget the potential unreliability. To me, the ability to readily disable them is the scariest thing about smart guns, as it completely defeats the purpose of the Second Amendment.

Just saw that video earlier today. I thought CN did a great job with it.