Underdog

Diners! Pizza!

Even with a COE, you would need a pistol permit for handguns. Some of us always have some on hand, and it wouldn't be a bad idea to have extra valid ones.

I don't like these. I got rid of one because the batteries were always a wild card and would not hold a charge. They seemed to be dead after a relatively short time frame.

What would you want in a tactical shotgun? I think it would be cool to design one that could easily be changed between 20 gauge and 12 gauge.

I was wondering if someone would catch that one and it took all of a few minutes.

Ruger Mark 9... Essentially an updated Ruger Mark II with the Mark III updated magazine release, in stainless and blued versions that would be calibered in 9mm Ruger GP100 w/ both .38/.357 and 9mm cylinders and polymer moonclips for each caliber All stainless steel Glock 17 or 19 CZ 75 Compact limited stainless w/ night sights and a decocker and 22LR conversion kit A compact and full-sized, double-action only, stainless semi-automatic handgun that is hammer-fired and has the trigger pull and feel of a good revolver, oh, and with a decocker... A new stainless Colt Woodsman...

Or get caught illegally protecting yourself in your own home...

While I was out, yesterday, my guide rod broke and shot out the front of the pistol. Has anybody else had this problem? Can I replace it with a Mil Spec. stainless 1911 guide rod?

SIG 229, Browning Hi-Power, FNH FNX-9, Ruger SR9/SR9C, Taurus PT709, CZ75B, CZ75 Compact, MR Baby Eagle II

That view must come down from the top.

Thank you for putting so clearly.

You know, I had jury duty and I forgot to remove a tiny little, essentially nail clipper with about a 1/2" blade on it from my key chain. I had to return to my car with it and leave it there before I fulfilled my duty as a citizen, and it was quite a walk. Well, on returning, I watched the security officer allow a man with an open brief case and full-size leatherman go through security. I then called him on it and asked why he should be allowed when I am not allowed. The officer of the court said, well, he's a prominant attorney. I said, I don't care who he is. If I cannot bring my keychain in, then he shouldn't be allowed. Well, the guard "checked" in his stainless tool. I am sure that once I walked away, he just passed it back to him. That has not sat well with me. I know, I know. There is a difference between a beat cop and a esquire.

I exaggerated a little, and I like 70-80% of the police officers I come in contact with, perhaps even more. And, I recognize the difficulty job that they have and the BS they put up with. But, the truth is that ALL citizens should be treated even-handedly and fairly, and we ALL should have the means and right to self-defense. Where do the police stand on my right to carry, and when has an official made a statement on my behalf?

There are others that might have enemies as well. Let the retired cops call the police if they need assistance, just like everyone else. If they feel that they are in danger, let them move. The police (and politicians and lawyers, judges included) are citizens and should not have ANY benefits that the average citizen doesn't have, unless it is proscribed in them doing their job. And, that said, they should have NO responsibility when off duty, unless they are being paid to be on call. I have a respect for police and the job and sacrifices that they go through, but that was something they chose. If I was in retail, I would have to work when the stores are open, etc. Working on building a skyscraper, well, I could fall, etc. And, currently police get paid plenty for their service with health benefits, etc. after they retire. Do those in uniform risk their lives? Yes. Are many exemplorary humans and citizens, you bet. Does the average citizen waiting for an officer risk his, you bet. Personally, I don't even think current LEOs should be able to carry off duty. And, while we are at it, I don't think they should have vests to wear, either, unless I am allowed. The "US" and "Them" attitude has little place in being a peace officer. I should be able to have access with whatever unclassified weapons the military or police have. I should be able to own a select fire M1A if I want to. And I should be able to carry concealed, or openly. As citizens, if the LEOs don't like that, then let them be part of changing the laws. And, I would start with the anti-gun, politically appointed leaders.

I have no problem with mine, either. They are perfect for practice.

Engaged with unwavering branches!

I am really thinking about getting a snubnose revolver for some fun and punishment... I was considering the Ruger LCR or maybe the semi-auto LC9. But, after reading about the Taurus polymer, I am interested. Has anyone seen or had a chance to handle/fire one of the new Taurus Protectors in .357 w/ the gripper grips, and if so, what was your impression? I am also interested in a comparison between it and the Ruger LCR, or perhaps the stainless Taurus 650 CIA. I am also interested in 9mm revolvers, such as the Taurus 905 or the Charter Arms... Has anybody heard anything about the new Charter Arms 9mm rimless snubnose revolver that is suppose to come out this February? Lastly, if you have any recommendations and/or thoughts on snubbies, please advise. Perhaps I should just stick with the Speed Six.

The sound of a shotgun being racked could just as easily escalate the problem as subdue it.

Sportsman's Guide had a good deal on a BSA Sweetwater 22: http://shop.sportsma...k.aspx?a=644012 I liked mine and someone recommended to me a while back on here.

For most users, I would think a semi-automatic would have the edge, although it would be more costly. If you practice with your 12 gauge pump (with your defensive rounds) and you are happy with it, then it would be the tool for you, especially in NJ, as pointed out earlier. But, for someone that doesn't practice too much with the gun, then a semi-automatic might be a good bet. As was additionally pointed out earlier, a semi-automatic would be easier to manipulate and use, it would have less recoil because the action would absorb some of the kick, and you would not have the problem of short-pumping the action and jamming the gun. You would, however, need to make sure you had shells that, probably not low recoil, that would work the action every time, and you would need to keep the gun clean. But, I don't think that that would be a problem for your home defense gun. In the field, I would probably rather have a pump for that reason, but at home, it would be clean in the closet/safe/ under the bed, etc. I also think that a 20 gauge is also quite acceptable, especially if someone with lesser physical capabilities is using it, such as elderly, etc. Would I just have a 20 gauge... NO. Would I just have a semi-automatic... NO. But, if I had a fine sample of 12 gauge pump (which I would get first for versatility, etc. and because I know how to use it)... I would still consider a 20 gauge semi-automatic with a short barrel for home defense. And, if you could get a tritium bead that wasn't visable to your opponent, so much the better. And, for legal jeapardy, you might not want it to be tacticool. I really like the Mossberg SA-20 Tactical, though, and may pick one up. For about 55% of the recoil, i could have something that provided 75% of the lead and it would be more easier to control and I would have the ability to have some pretty fast backup shots. A Saiga 20 would also be a good idea if I didn't live in NJ.

Kydex JS Holster

Guns were already banned from campus before that happened.

I would get a revolver.

Maybe, but I have purchased guns from him. I will give another chance because I wouldn't want him to go out of business and for there to be one less option.

May the Glock be with you!