Rob0115

Glockmeister one looks neat just replacing the firing pin cover.

Dude what don't you get? I said if they change the mag laws, they don't get grandfathered and you keeps yours then you are committing a crime. I reread it. I didn't decide or define that breaking the law, intentional or not, is a criminal action. I also commmeted that the destructive protests that someone referenced aren't heroic. In my last post I cut and paste from your posts. I didn't put the words, 99,99999995% of gun owners are prohibited. You typed that, I copied it for you to have a chance to read over again I acknowledged due process and said yes you are accused of being a criminal You're getting into silly semantics If you believe it's not big deal go out and buy a 30 round magpul or drum. I'm not measuring anyone, I outlined a hypothetical situation and nothing more. I can't believe you don't know what you posted. Who typed the quotes below? Are you not calling me a criminal I s the second quoted post? If I'm prohibited and holding firearms isn't that breaking the law? In the first quoted post, on-compliance is a crime. I don't get what your saying. If caught you will be arrested and tried in all likelihood. You go in to give your further opinion that virtually everyone is committing a crime. Aren't the above judgemental statements? It's got your name or did someone hack your account? Do you think calling everyone, almost everyone, prohibited, thus committing a crime a smart thing to do in a public Internet forum? And maybe you're right and I judged. I chose to believe that people were compliant with the laws and in the worst case not knowingly out of compliance by and large. Hardly harsh judgement.

First I said move on and meant it. Really my last post. Re-read, I accused no one of committing crimes. I asserted the best course of action is to comply with the laws. I judged no one you and others are free to do what you want. You on the other hand called me a criminal directly From your post: 99.99995% chance that you did not comply with a law in the last one year alone. And then you accused everyone else of being a criminal (or at least almost everyone else). Then you wrote If non-compliance alone makes someone a criminal & prohibited person, then atleast 99.9% of gun owners including LEOs (and dont forget Politicians) are prohibited. Advising people to steer clear of committing crimes isn't accusing them of anything. If you don't see how dumb it is to call me a criminal and then 99.9999995% of gun owners criminals on a public internet forum than I cannot help you.

Last reply because this is beyond silly. You don't know me or anything about me. Accusing me of being a prohibited person is beyond acceptable. I'll not insult you but move on.

As I said earlier there is no difference other than you haven't been caught. And, as I said to another poster, you can go any path you'd like and I wish you no harm.

No I'm saying it's a nonsensical comparison and if you don't get the ridiculousness I can't explain it to you. If I move to fantasy land and we go back to the days of eugenics I'll rethink my stance. It doesn't matter what the compliance numbers are for the SAFE Act you still run the risk of prosecution by not complying. I'm not gong to argue with you as you are free to do as you wish. I don't follow orders but I follow the laws and not selectively.

Yes thanks to the constitution you are innocent until proven guilty. If you don't comply you are committing a crime, you will only be punished if caught and found guilty. I should say you are committing a criminal act. I'm really not sure how that changes anything at all. Other folks have insinuated not from my cold dead hands. Just read the thread on Another Democratic NJ Governor.

For a Glock MOS which MOA reticle would be better?

I don't understand why Cabela's won't ship Hazmat reloading components to NJ either. That's fairly recent.

Illegal laws are proven to be illegal in the courts. You make a ridiculous analogy with red headed children given we have actual case law on AR bans and the NY Safe Act. When, hopefully, and if they are struck down then they will be illegal. I can't speak to the founders they are dead and their guns were compliant, just look at High Exposures example. If you are suggesting that you'd forcefully resist the police then that's your decision.

Most would surrender them because they want to abide by the laws. Until the court gives relief that the safe act, in NY, is burdensome it remains the law of the land. NJ may have the same potential and compliacne is not weakness, it's intellgince. It's not heroic, it's criminal. Remember we always say whenver gun rights are attacked that we are law abiding gun owners. If you do not comply you are now a criminal and no longer a law abinding gun owner--a prohibted person. You've lost the high ground in which to fight legally.

Why would cops die trying to collect magazines? You'll be asked to turn them in and if you don't you're a criminal. I don't see them going door-to-door for compliance. My guess is that if you're caught them you'll be arrested. Let's say your house is broken into and during the investigation they discover your "high-capacity" magazines? You'll just be charged. Are you insinuating a gun battle will ensue? You're the second person to suggest that the average joe is going to die in the streets over the change in gun laws. I'll just politely disagree.

Wow that was cold.

inheritance implies the giver is dead.

Keep it and let me know when the blue grip version arrives so I can buy it.

No and I'm familiar with who Phil is.

The guy who shutdown the FFL. I tracked him down after he moved from AZ to FL. I told him I had called AZ ATF field agents and now that I knew he was in FL that I'd call the atf there. Taking personal possession of the guns after FFL expired is an illegal transfer. He'd done a few other shady things as well. However I knew where he lived and told if I didn't have a tracking number in an hour that I'd call the ATF. So he sent them back. I don't see you having the same issue if no one takes over the business. It took me two years to get my guns back. I don't think you'll have the same issues.

Haiku hurts my brain Rather blather my dumb crap in a simpler way

I made a mistake sorry 'bout the politics meant no disrespect

I am really drunk i ate lots of beef brisket now I may throw up

I replied Haiku ' because the thread's all haiku I used poor English

Lefty's are morose Clinton's loss made them insane Make our country great .

It was booked into his gunsmithing book which is the record. If you feel that you'll never get it back you can call the ATF. I did that when a gunsmith went out of business. I did eventually receive the guns but lost my work deposit.

you come to FL Shoot that really cool shit too Then you'll have some fun

Good to know.