45Doll

That wouldn't stop the federal government from doing it. Especially if it's 'for your own safety'.

Not to be outdone... House Democrat Mary Gay Scanlon Carjacked at Gunpoint in Philadelphia (breitbart.com)

Yes, we are looking at that. I suppose I could put up a 'feeler' ad on the board to see if anyone's interested. Not sure if that's kosher though. We might actually recoup all the lease costs. I've run a spreadsheet on this but Mrs. 45Doll and I have a few options to iron out to decide what to do next. Buying the vehicle for ourselves is on the table, given replacement vehicle availability. Thanks @Bomber If we decide to flip it this board will be the first to know!

Our Rav4 LE lease is up in February. I checked out the average price for a used 2019 with 16K miles, and it was just about the sticker price when new. So, we could have bought the car in 2019, used it for three years, then sold it for what we paid for it and avoided all the lease interest. Maybe we even would have made a few dollars. Who knew?

Inventory & Supply of New & Used Vehicles in Dollars & Units: What a Mess | Wolf Street

That's an interesting question. I'll have to generate a few emails back with BCC. I don't believe at the target server the receiver knows what field the recipient address occupies. So, I don't think discrimination based on recipient field works well. But I'll have to check. Since I have my own private email domain, I can tell you it was MUCH MORE IMPORTANT to have DMARC, SPF and DKIM set up on the domain to insure minimum classification as SPAM. I always use BCC for distribution lists, and my reception rate went from about 40 to 100% after I implemented all of it. Before implementation I used to get large numbers of rejections when sending out to distribution lists. Not anymore! And as far as I know Gmail has all of that in place, even for private domains they host. So, their rejection rate should be low.

That's what the BCC line is for. You'll never know.

Merry Christmas!

Theoretically executing six is possible, but it didn't always work out. Your timing had to be really good. The main limiting factor for me was actually getting the paper permits in hand within a week of their start date. There was a time when it was taking two weeks! You only have about 28 days to play with in the 180 considering timing, days closed, holidays, NICS delays etc. Now with the electronic version you should be able to exercise your first permit the day it's issued. So I think six in 180 days is much more doable.

I take your point, and I agree; less is better. However, most strategies recommended by firearm legal experts advise conveying relevant facts (not actions, thoughts, motives, reasons etc.) pertinent to the scenario. I realize my scenario may have done just that. My point was that after stating the obvious, shut your mouth. Obviously, every scenario is different. I think the main point is self-restraint and not nervously breaking into a blab fest. The jury should hear one and only one version of what happened: yours. And by the way, don't plead the 5th. it's "I want an attorney." "Everything you say can be used against you in court." The corollary you never hear: "Nothing you say in your favor will be used in court, because it's up to the prosecutor to introduce it."

@Mr.Stu Right! I was going to do something similar my first time around with an MHE. But after carefully reading the statute and the form itself, I realized that "furthering my collection' was a satisfactory reason. So, I used that reason and shut my mouth! In New Jersey there's nothing quite like walking out of an FFL with a milk crate full of handgun cases. Viva la collection!

The prosecutor can't bring the defendant to the stand. Testifying is up to the defendant and his lawyers. "You are free to speculate. I couldn't possibly comment." Ian Richardson, House of Cards

You're not the first to be confused in NJ. So don't sweat it. We understand. This is New Jersey, where confusion is part of the strategy to discourage you from buying guns. The only reason you would be required to fill out and submit a Multiple Handgun Exemption (MHE) for the two handguns at your FFL is if you wanted to (or had to) purchase both handguns on the same day. In that case, make, model and serial number would be required. Otherwise, you would apply for two (or more) Permits to Purchase (P2Ps) which don't require any specific information, and you would have used each of those per NJ law at least 30 days apart. And by the way, to use a MHE, you would still have to have (in your case) two P2Ps. A MHE is not a substitute for P2Ps. It only lets you execute more than one P2P at a time and skip the 30-day waiting period between purchases.

Police: What happened? Homeowner: The deceased broke into my house, threatened me with his gun, and I shot him. Police: I see the opened storage boxes next to your bed and the keys on the floor. What happened? Homeowner: I want a lawyer. The first time the homeowner's account is heard, if it is heard, will be the homeowner in court. And no one will be positioned to dispute it.

I will look for this as I cross the Delaware into America this afternoon! Of course I'm keeping my PA gun club and any other firearm people I know in PA alert to what's going on here. Gun Control Fever is more contagious than Omicron!

Good observation. Perhaps because when he's done, he'll call it a Communist state.

“We have among the lowest gun-crime realities of any American state. That’s what we’re committed to. We have no issue with law-abiding Second Amendment folks. That’s not our objective. And I think the packages we’ve already seen passed, as well as this prospective package, all continue to get at making our state responsibly, sensibly, and reasonably the strongest gun-safety state in America.” Phil Murphy Yeah, rIght. Unless you're in one of the five outstanding counties. Then it's the wild west. And the report on this leaves out all the significant and ridiculous details. N.J. lawmakers move to toughen state’s already strict gun laws - nj.com And this one. Eight new proposed gun laws endorsed by Assembly committees (nj1015.com)

@Mr.Stu I fixed that for you. I know you meant 6. Not 60. Unless of course you're going to use a MHE for around 55 in one go! @Lawnmower2021 Apply for six as above. You won't regret it. Having spare permit(s) on hand is never a bad thing. The only way this could happen is if you were filling out the Multiple Handgun Exemption (MHE) form, which requires that information. Get the right form. The application for Permits to Purchase a handgun has no such requirements.

I wrote, got a couple 'we agree' responses, and the one Asm address that was bad. I took the 10,000-foot view. "I watched in horror during 2020 as Democrat administrations across the country permitted rioters and looters to run unabated through their jurisdictions, ruining lives, businesses and personal property. Not satisfied with just having rioters and looters running free to do their worst, in many cases those Democrat administrations retracted their police forces to make sure the rioters and looters were unencumbered, even to the point of raising bail for them, or releasing them uncharged. And now the Democrat administration of New Jersey, not satisfied with completely disarming us legally in public, wants to effectively disarm us and leave us defenseless in our own homes. Having guaranteed safety for criminals in the streets of New Jersey, it wants to guarantee their safety in citizens’ homes as well. That is the actual effect of the bills you are considering Monday. According to our state police, 80% of the gun violence in this state occurs in only five of our twenty-one counties. Are you focused there? No! Instead, you’re redoubling your efforts to put all the legal gun owners in New Jersey in an ever-tightening legal straight jacket, assuring the largest possible pool of defenseless victims. You’re fooling no one. None of these bills do anything to PREVENT crimes or gun violence. To say they’ll reduce crime or gun violence, or promote gun safety, is a lie. And anyone who supports these bills should be ashamed. But I’m confident they won’t be." And it looks like I was right. They passed them all.

Sorry, but they are not sick. They are 75% towards tyrannical, and they like it. As soon as they disarm all the citizens, they'll feel free to complete their chess game. Checkmate is when only the government has guns.