TheSingularity

Curious to hear your feedback on this one. Thanks!

Whoops - compliant, not complaint.

Veprs are probably the biggest gem there is when it comes to NJ complaint AK variants. They are basically a heavy duty RPK in a civilian/sporterized configuration. The best AK type money can buy in my opinion.

Speaking of boatloads, I bet they are bringing their guns along as well.

"It's not the deer that I'm worried about"

Yes - it was a joke! LOL - but the point is, who knows what restrictive absurdity lies ahead. Hoping for the best and remaining vocal for sure.

Inward Facing Muzzle. The rifle must be altered so that the muzzle points directly back at the person pulling the trigger.

NJ probably will only go to a 10 round maximum mag restriction. So, slightly better situation than NY. But I hear that the downside is NJ will likely enact an IFM requirement to go along with the 10 round restriction.

Absolutely, that is the knock-out punch. An upper cut. But that will be saved for the rematch fight, a few years down the road. They want the 2013 fight to just be a rope-a-dope with a lot of swinging and posturing, with the only real objective in this particular fight to land the solid jab of a firearms registration.

I am expecting a lot of aggressive-looking "head fakes" by the anti gunners in the coming weeks and months... But make no mistake about it, the only punch they really want to land is a firearms registration of some kind.

My fear is that, after all is said and done this year, Congress will reach some sort of purported "compromise" that will be a combination of what could be argued as a relatively "mild" ban, along with a firearm registration requirement. And I don't personally agree with ANY ban being "mild" ... but I am referring to things like a 10 round mag restriction, restrictions like that. Anyway, my point is: this ban will actually be DESIGNED to fail. The ban will be held out to the public by the anti-gunners as their sincere, good-faith effort to balance gun violence reduction and 2nd amendment rights. But candidly they will know - and hope - that the gun violence continues after the ban. After about five years, the anti-gunners will be able to say: "look, we tried this ban, and it obviously wasn't enough. Turns out there are just too many of these pre-ban guns already on the streets. We tried our best under the circumstances, but it just didn't work." Then their obvious argument will be for confiscation. Since they will already have the registration info. Not that you all don't already know this.

They will get to the shotgun ban once they are finished pushing through the zorb ban.

An executive order prohibiting the importing of 7.62x39 ammo would turn a lot of AKs into little more than paper weights for a lot of people - at least for a period of time.

Look for the Russian import ban immediately following the inauguration, to coincide with the introduction of the Feinstein bill.

Historical Executive Orders on Gun Control: "On March 15, 1989, less than two months after taking office, Bush temporarily banned, by executive order, the importation various semi-automatic assault weapons.[3] That ban was extended a few weeks later to include additional firearms,[4] and was made permanent by Bush in July, 1989.[5] During his term, President Clinton also used the power of executive orders to implement gun control policies. On April 6, 1998 Clinton signed an order that permanently banned the importation of more than 50 semiautomatic "assault weapons".[12] In 1999 White House domestic policy chief Bruce D. Reed said, "The country is tired of waiting for Congress to respond to the tragedy in Littleton. The administration is going to do every thing in its power to make progress on guns."[13] In 2001 Clinton also used executive orders to ban the importation of "assault pistols" and tighten licensing rules on gun dealers.[14] Many accused Clinton of overuse of the executive power on gun control issues." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_con...Administration

The executive order will pertain to imported guns and ammo. The primary target will be Russian AKs and 7.62. Everything - Saigas included. This is partially in response to Russia banning U.S. adoption of Russian children. No, I am not kidding...

I am tying to find the language in the 2nd amendment where it specifies that it is okay for the "authorities" to have more firepower than the people. And for that matter, for retired "authorities" to carry concealed "just because," and not for the people.

I've got a new case of 300 rounds of Hornady .223 steel match 52 grain that I am looking to sell in Atlantic County if anyone would be interested (otherwise will probably put up on gunbroker for $250 buy-it-now).

Any special laws, procedures, rules, or regulations to be aware of? I am talking about a private citizen selling to another private citizens, both with firearms ID cards. Thanks!

I will be there. Would be nice to meet up with some of you there.

Sorry guys - didn't mean to stir anything up - just got fired up

LOL - if so, my apologies

Absolutely true - check it out!! http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/50208495#50208495

Detachable magazine plus pistol grip (even thumbhole stock) would be banned. The pistol grip is the one qualifying military characteristic. I was originally gonna say what about a completely stock Saiga rifle, but based on the list used on (failed) proposals in recent years, look for Saiga to be on the specifically-named list.

Could be so - I really hope so